Thermal shock resistance of a refractory castable containing andalusite aggregate

被引:34
|
作者
Ribeiro, G. C. [1 ]
Resende, W. S. [2 ]
Rodrigues, J. A. [3 ]
Ribeiro, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Lorena Sch Engn EEL, Dept Mat Engn DEMAR, Estr Santa Lucrecia S-N,CP 116, BR-12600970 Lorena, SP, Brazil
[2] IBAR, Poa, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Dept Mat Engn DEMa, BR-13560 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Hasselman's parameters; Thermal shock; Elastic modulus; Andalusite; Castable; FRACTURE; MULLITIZATION; BEHAVIOR; MULLITE; MICROSTRUCTURE; TEMPERATURE; ENERGY; PHASE; WORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.09.079
中图分类号
TQ174 [陶瓷工业]; TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
One of the most important aspects to be evaluated when predicting the performance of refractory materials is their thermal shock resistance, especially considering the thermomechanical loads to which they are subjected. The methods currently used to predict thermal shock resistance behavior are based on Hasselman's studies, which take into account various experimental parameters. Thermal shock resistance can also be evaluated experimentally by applying thermal shock cycles and measuring the residual elastic modulus after each cycle. To predict and evaluate this resistance, test specimens of a commercial castable were cast, cured, dried and fired at 1000 degrees C and 1450 degrees C for five hours. Using Hasselman's parameters, the refractory fired at 1450 degrees C was predicted to present lower thermal shock resistance, which was confirmed by experimental thermal shock tests. The results indicated that the modulus of elasticity and modulus of rupture decreased by about 72% in specimens fired at 1000 degrees C, and by 82% in those fired at 1450 degrees C. Therefore, the specimens fired at 1450 degrees C showed lower thermal shock resistance. This finding underscores the importance of evaluating the behavior of castables with different microstructures resulting from different firing temperatures.
引用
收藏
页码:19167 / 19171
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Determination of thermal shock resistance in refractory materials by ultrasonic pulse velocity measurement
    Boccaccini, D. N.
    Romagnoli, M.
    Kamseu, E.
    Veronesi, Paolo
    Leonelli, C.
    Pellacani, G. C.
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2007, 27 (2-3) : 1859 - 1863
  • [42] Prediction of the thermal shock resistance of refractory materials using R-values
    Izadpanah, MR
    Mahani, MF
    ADVANCES IN REFRACTORIES FOR THE METALLURGICAL INDUSTRIES IV, 2004, : 595 - 604
  • [43] The medium-cement refractory castable - A promising material for thermal power units
    Goberis, S
    Pundene, I
    REFRACTORIES AND INDUSTRIAL CERAMICS, 2002, 43 (9-10) : 306 - 309
  • [44] Thermal conductivity and mechanical properties related to microstructure of a high alumina refractory castable
    Simonin, F
    Elaqra, H
    Olagnon, C
    Fantozzi, G
    SILICATES INDUSTRIELS, 2001, 66 (3-4): : 33 - 39
  • [45] The Medium-Cement Refractory Castable — a Promising Material for Thermal Power Units
    S. Goberis
    I. Pundene
    Refractories and Industrial Ceramics, 2002, 43 : 306 - 309
  • [46] Evaluation of the matrix characteristics of refractory castable containing gel-routed nanosized spinel
    Ghosal, S.
    Bodhak, S.
    Chowdhury, A.
    Mukhopadhyay, S.
    INDUSTRIAL CERAMICS, 2006, 26 (01): : 29 - 36
  • [47] Self-formed mullite containing refractory barium silicate cements and their castable applications
    Khalil, NM
    Zawrah, MF
    BRITISH CERAMIC TRANSACTIONS, 2004, 103 (05): : 223 - 226
  • [48] Evaluation of the thermal shock resistance of aluminate-silicate refractory castables. Effect of the thermal treatment
    Faccin, Federico
    Prado, Andrea F.
    Tomba Martinez, Analia Gladys
    Ramajo, Leandro
    BOLETIN DE LA SOCIEDAD ESPANOLA DE CERAMICA Y VIDRIO, 2019, 58 (06): : 246 - 254
  • [49] RESISTANCE TO THERMAL SHOCK
    CHENG, CM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ROCKET SOCIETY, 1951, 21 (06): : 147 - 153
  • [50] RESISTANCE TO THERMAL SHOCK
    MAYER, E
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ROCKET SOCIETY, 1952, 22 (02): : 98 - 98