Development and validation of CAVE score in predicting presence of pressure ulcer in intensive care patients

被引:11
|
作者
Ninbanphot, Suchada [1 ]
Narawong, Pinyada [2 ]
Theeranut, Ampornpan [3 ,4 ]
Sawanyawisuth, Kittisak [2 ]
Limpawattana, Panita [2 ]
机构
[1] KhonKaen Univ, Fac Med, Intens Care Unit Internal Med, Khon Kaen, Thailand
[2] Khon Kaen Univ, Fac Med, Dept Internal Med, Khon Kaen, Thailand
[3] Khon Kaen Univ, Fac Nursing & Res, Khon Kaen, Thailand
[4] Khon Kaen Univ, Training Ctr Enhancing Qual Life Working Age Peop, Khon Kaen, Thailand
关键词
Nursing; Health profession; Critical care; Intensive care medicine; Internal medicine; Clinical research; BRADEN SCALE; RISK-ASSESSMENT; VALIDITY; UNIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04612
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Pressure ulcers (PUs) are one of the quality care indicators in nursing care. They are considered to primarily be preventable. Early identification of the patients most at risk particular for critically ill patients is crucial for providing prompt care. Several tools have been developed to support healthcare providers, but their validities are limited in Thailand. Development of tools with better performance is essential. Aims: To develop and validate a PU risk assessment tool with good diagnostic properties in intensive care units (ICUs). Methods: A prospective study was conducted in ICUs of a tertiary care hospital, Thailand from January 2019 to April 2020. Baseline data were collected at admission to the ICUs. Skin assessment was evaluated every 24 h. Data were divided into two sets: model development and model validation. Creating a risk score which was derived from multivariate methods were performed. Youden index were used to determine the optimal cut-off point. Then, the other dataset was used to validate the risk score. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves was used to demonstrate the performance of the test. Results: The study included 288 and 270 patients for development and validation models. The risk score consisted 4 clinical factors; presence of Cardiovascular disease, low serum Albumin, having Ventilated, and Edema (CAVE score). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.8 anda score at 2.5 was the best cut-off point. The AUC in the validation group was 0.6, age 60 years was 0.78, and age 60 years was 0.57. Conclusion: The predictive validity of the CAVE score is limited but comparable to the existing tools in Thailand. However, it has a good diagnostic property in young patients. The CAVE score could be considered as an alternate screening tool in critical care setting particularly for young patients.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pressure Ulcer Prevention in the Intensive Care Unit A Case Study
    Flike, Kimberlee
    CRITICAL CARE NURSING QUARTERLY, 2013, 36 (04) : 415 - 420
  • [22] Early Identification of Patients at Risk for Difficult Intubation in the Intensive Care Unit Development and Validation of the MACOCHA Score in a Multicenter Cohort Study
    De Jong, Audrey
    Molinari, Nicolas
    Terzi, Nicolas
    Mongardon, Nicolas
    Arnal, Jean-Michel
    Guitton, Christophe
    Allaouchiche, Bernard
    Paugam-Burtz, Catherine
    Constantin, Jean-Michel
    Lefrant, Jean-Yves
    Leone, Marc
    Papazian, Laurent
    Asehnoune, Karim
    Maziers, Nicolas
    Azoulay, Elie
    Pradel, Gael
    Jung, Boris
    Jaber, Samir
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 187 (08) : 832 - 839
  • [23] Modified National Early Warning Score (MNEWS) in predicting the mortality of intensive care unit patients
    Wang, Shengyu
    Tian, Yao
    Yao, Yang
    Zhou, Jing
    Chen, Hui
    Diao, Xin
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 99 (1174) : 875 - 882
  • [24] Therapeutic hypothermia and pressure ulcer risk in critically ill intensive care patients: A retrospective study
    Ahtiala, Maarit
    Laitio, Ruut
    Soppi, Esa
    INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2018, 46 : 80 - 85
  • [25] Derivation and validation of a risk score for admission to the Intensive Care Unit in patients with COVID-19
    Ena, J.
    Segura-Heras, J., V
    Fonseca-Aizpuru, E. M.
    Lopez-Reboiro, M. L.
    Gracia-Gutierrez, A.
    Martin-Oterino, J. A.
    Diez-Canseco, A. Martin-Urda
    Perez-Garcia, C.
    Ramos-Rincon, J. M.
    Gomez-Huelgas, R.
    REVISTA CLINICA ESPANOLA, 2022, 222 (01): : 1 - 12
  • [26] The effect of vasopressor agents on pressure injury development in intensive care patients
    Kebapci, Ayda
    Tilki, Ruhat
    INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2024, 83
  • [27] A Descriptive Study of Turkish Intensive Care Nurses' Pressure Ulcer Prevention Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceived Barriers to Care
    Aydogan, Sinan
    Caliskan, Nurcan
    WOUND MANAGEMENT & PREVENTION, 2019, 65 (02) : 39 - 47
  • [28] INDEPENDENT VALIDATION OF APACHE-II SEVERITY OF ILLNESS SCORE FOR PREDICTING MORTALITY IN PATIENTS WITH BREAST-CANCER ADMITTED TO THE INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT
    HEADLEY, J
    THERIAULT, R
    SMITH, TL
    CANCER, 1992, 70 (02) : 497 - 503
  • [29] Pressure Ulcer in Intensive Care Units: a case-control study
    Ponchio Pacha, Heloisa Helena
    Lamana Faria, Josimerci Ittavo
    de Oliveira, Kleber Aparecido
    Beccaria, Lucia Marinilza
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2018, 71 (06) : 3027 - 3034
  • [30] Predicting survival in cardiac arrest patients admitted to intensive care using the Prognosis After Resuscitation score
    R Porter
    I Goodhart
    A Temple
    Critical Care, 15 (Suppl 1):