Explanation Feedback Is Better Than Correct Answer Feedback for Promoting Transfer of Learning

被引:119
作者
Butler, Andrew C. [1 ]
Godbole, Namrata [2 ]
Marsh, Elizabeth J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Greensboro, Dept Psychol, Greensboro, NC USA
关键词
feedback; learning; retention; transfer; COMPUTER-ASSISTED-INSTRUCTION; DIFFERENTIAL FEEDBACK; WRITTEN INSTRUCTION; RETENTION; RECONSOLIDATION; QUESTIONS; RESPONSES; LEVEL; TESTS;
D O I
10.1037/a0031026
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Among the many factors that influence the efficacy of feedback on learning, the information contained in the feedback message is arguably the most important. One common assumption is that there is a benefit to increasing the complexity of the feedback message beyond providing the correct answer. Surprisingly, studies that have manipulated the content of the feedback message in order to isolate the unique effect of greater complexity have failed to support this assumption. However, the final test in most of these studies consisted of a repetition of the same questions from the initial test. The present research investigated whether feedback that provides an explanation of the correct answer promotes superior transfer of learning to new questions. In 2 experiments, subjects studied prose passages and then took an initial short-answer test on concepts from the text. After each question, they received correct answer feedback, explanation feedback, or no feedback (Experiment 1 only). Two days later, subjects returned for a final test that consisted of both repeated questions and new inference questions. The results showed that correct answer feedback and explanation feedback led to equivalent performance on the repeated questions, but explanation feedback produced superior performance on the new inference questions.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 298
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Anderson J.R., 1997, Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, P849, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-044481862-1.50103-5, 10.1016/b978-044481862-1.50103-5]
[2]   LEVEL OF ADJUNCT QUESTION, TYPE OF FEEDBACK, AND LEARNING-CONCEPTS BY READING [J].
ANDRE, T ;
THIEMAN, A .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 13 (03) :296-307
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, HDB RES ED COMMUNICA, DOI DOI 10.1007/S00127-009-0052-2
[4]   THE INSTRUCTIONAL-EFFECT OF FEEDBACK IN TEST-LIKE EVENTS [J].
BANGERTDROWNS, RL ;
KULIK, CLC ;
KULIK, JA ;
MORGAN, M .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1991, 61 (02) :213-238
[5]   When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer [J].
Barnett, SM ;
Ceci, SJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2002, 128 (04) :612-637
[6]  
Black P., 1998, Assessment in Education: principles, policy & practice, V5, P7, DOI [10.1080/0969595980050102, DOI 10.1080/0969595980050102]
[7]   Correcting a metacognitive error: Feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses [J].
Butler, Andrew C. ;
Karpicke, Jeffrey D. ;
Roediger, Henry L., III .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2008, 34 (04) :918-928
[8]   The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests [J].
Butler, Andrew C. ;
Karpicke, Jeffrey D. ;
Roediger, Henry L., III .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 2007, 13 (04) :273-281
[9]   Repeated Testing Produces Superior Transfer of Learning Relative to Repeated Studying [J].
Butler, Andrew C. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2010, 36 (05) :1118-1133
[10]  
BUTLER DL, 1995, REV EDUC RES, V65, P245, DOI 10.3102/00346543065003245