Tibial bypass using complex autologous conduit: Patency and limb salvage

被引:16
作者
Halloran, BG [1 ]
Lilly, MP [1 ]
Cohn, EJ [1 ]
Benjamin, ME [1 ]
Flinn, WR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Div Vasc Surg, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s10016-001-0090-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Over an 8-year period, we performed 93 lower extremity bypasses using complex autologous conduits, which included (1) contralateral greater saphenous vein (GSV), (2) composite GSV, (3) superficial femoral vein, (4) lesser saphenous vein, (5) cephalic or basilic veins, and (6) composite-sequential (PTFE and vein) grafts. These grafts represented 16% of all infrainguinal bypasses during this period, and all grafts were performed to treat limb-threatening ischemia. Survival, patency, and limb salvage were examined by the life-table method. Primary graft patency was 46 and 38% at 3 and 5 years. Assisted-primary patency was 62 and 59%, and secondary graft patency rates were 68 and 64% at 3 and 5 years. Twenty-nine bypasses (31%) required revision to restore or maintain patency. The 3-year limb salvage rate was significantly better when revision was performed for graft stenosis than for graft thrombosis (90% vs. 46%, p <0.05). Overall limb salvage rate was 73% at 5 years. The mortality rate was 5.4% and the 5-year survival was 51%. Complex autologous tibial bypasses provided acceptable long-term limb salvage in patients with severe ischemia and inadequate ipsilateral GSV. The increased operating time and complexity required did not produce prohibitive operative risks. Postoperative graft surveillance in these complex vein bypasses allowed revision in many cases before graft occlusion occurred and significantly improved long-term limb salvage.
引用
收藏
页码:634 / 643
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
AbouZamzam AM, 1996, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V131, P894
[2]  
Alexander JJ, 1996, AM J SURG, V172, P118
[3]  
ANDERSON CB, 1992, SURGERY, V112, P6
[4]  
Andros G, 1995, Semin Vasc Surg, V8, P179
[5]  
ANDROS G, 1995, SEMIN VASC SURG, V8, P169
[6]   Surgical and endovascular intervention for infrainguinal vein graft stenosis [J].
Avino, AJ ;
Bandyk, DF ;
Gonsalves, AJ ;
Johnson, BL ;
Black, TJ ;
Zwiebel, BR ;
Rahaim, MJ ;
Cantor, A .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 29 (01) :60-70
[7]  
Bandyk D F, 1993, Semin Vasc Surg, V6, P92
[8]   LINTON PATCH ANGIOPLASTY - AN ADJUNCT TO DISTAL BYPASS WITH POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE GRAFTS [J].
BATSON, RC ;
SOTTIURAI, VS ;
CRAIGHEAD, CC .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1984, 199 (06) :684-693
[9]   PREFERRED STRATEGIES FOR SECONDARY INFRAINGUINAL BYPASS - LESSONS LEARNED FROM 300 CONSECUTIVE REOPERATIONS [J].
BELKIN, M ;
CONTE, MS ;
DONALDSON, MC ;
MANNICK, JA ;
WHITTEMORE, AD .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1995, 21 (02) :282-295
[10]  
Bell PRF, 1998, CARDIOVASC SURG, V6, P17