A study of the development of critical thinking skills using an innovative web 2.0 tool

被引:10
作者
Eales-Reynolds, Lesley-Jane [1 ]
Gillham, David [2 ]
Grech, Carol
Clarke, Colin [4 ]
Cornell, Jacqueline [3 ]
机构
[1] Kingston Univ, London, England
[2] Flinders Univ S Australia, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[3] Univ S Australia, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, WRAP Project, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[4] Univ Westminster, London W1R 8AL, England
关键词
Web; 2.0; Critical thinking; Higher education; E-pedagogy; Web resource appraisal process; WRAP;
D O I
10.1016/j.nedt.2012.05.017
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Healthcare educators face numerous challenges including technological change, information overload, and the need to maintain clinical expertise and research knowledge across multiple specialities. Students also need to develop their capacity for critical thinking, using and discriminating between diverse sources of knowledge in order to advance their own practice. Objectives: To investigate student perceptions of the affordances of a novel web 2.0-based tool - the Web Resource Appraisal Process (WRAP), designed to support the development of critical thinking skills, and to identify how student's understanding of critical thinking and their use of web 2.0 resources might inform the cross-disciplinary development of the WRAP. Design: A two phase, action research study of student perceptions of the WRAP and their ability to source and identify valid information sources. Settings: Implemented at the University of South Australia, development of the WRAP is an international project with the University of Westminster, UK. Participants: Students from international locations participated in the project. Methods: A mixed methods approach was adopted involving a two phase action research study. In phase one, student perceptions of the WRAP were obtained using a modified course feedback questionnaire. This informed the development of a subsequent questionnaire used to survey student perceptions of their usage of online resources, the ease of access of such resources and their approaches to determining their validity. Results: Results suggest that students mainly use traditional resources when preparing work for assessment and they either do not understand the concept of, or do not exercise, critical thinking skills in such activities. However, the feedback from students using the WRAP, demonstrated that they found it instructive and useful. Conclusions: To ensure that practice developments are based on authoritative evidence, students need to develop critical thinking skills which may be facilitated by tools such as the WRAP. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:752 / 756
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Educational technology
[2]   Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment [J].
Biggs, J .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 1996, 32 (03) :347-364
[3]  
Birenbaum M., 1996, ALTERNATIVES ASSESSM
[4]   Authentic assessment of teaching in context [J].
Darling-Hammond, L ;
Snyder, J .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2000, 16 (5-6) :523-545
[5]  
Griffiths J.R. Brophy., 2005, Student searching behavior and the web: use of academic resources and Google
[6]   Worries with the Web: A look at student use of Web resources [J].
Grimes, DJ ;
Boening, CH .
COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, 2001, 62 (01) :11-23
[7]  
Gulikers J. T. M., 2007, BALANCING DILEMMAS A
[8]  
Herrington J., 1998, HIGHER ED RES DEV, V17, P385
[9]   CONVINCING EVIDENCE FROM CONTROLLED AND UNCONTROLLED STUDIES ON THE LIPID-LOWERING EFFECT OF A STATIN [J].
Higgins, Julian .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (12)
[10]   A five-year study of on-campus Internet use by undergraduate biomedical students [J].
Judd, Terry ;
Kennedy, Gregor .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2010, 55 (04) :1564-1571