ISM and Fuzzy MICMAC application for analysis of Lean Six Sigma barriers with environmental considerations

被引:64
作者
Ben Ruben, R. [1 ]
Vinodh, S. [1 ]
Asokan, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol, Dept Prod Engn, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Six Sigma; Lean manufacturing; Lean Six Sigma; Interpretive structural modeling; Fuzzy MICMAC; Environmental considerations; CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS; MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISES; FRAMEWORK; IMPLEMENTATION; SUSTAINABILITY; SELECTION; STRATEGY; GREEN; MODEL; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1108/IJLSS-11-2016-0071
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this study is to prioritize and analyze the barriers that affect Lean Six Sigma (LSS) adoption with environmental considerations. Design/methodology/approach - To find interrelationships and mutual influences among the identified barriers, an integrated interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and Fuzzy MICMAC (Matrice d'Impacts Croises Multiplication Appliques a un Classement approach was applied). In total, 20 crucial barriers that affect LSS adoption with environmental considerations have been derived from the literature and in consultation with experts hailing from the industry and academia. Findings - Based on the analysis, the most dominant and dependent barriers that affects LSS adoption with environmental considerations have been identified. The barriers, namely, "lack of top management commitment", "lack of training and education" and "lack of funds for green projects", occupy the base segment of the ISM hierarchy; the barriers, namely, "difficulty in adopting environmental strategies", "stringent government policies", "negative attitude towards sustainability concepts", "improper communication" and "lack of defect monitoring analysis", occupy the top level of the ISM hierarchy. Practical implications - The analysis helped in identifying and prioritizing the barriers that affect LSS adoption with environmental considerations using a mathematical approach. This approach is also helpful for practitioners to focus on removing the key dominant barriers and to enable LSS adoption with environmental considerations smoothly. Originality/value - The analysis helped in identifying and prioritizing the barriers that affect LSS adoption with environmental considerations using the Fuzzy MICMAC approach which has not been attempted in the past. The structural model is developed holistically based on the inputs gathered from practitioners and academicians to ensure practical validity. Also, this approach is helpful for practitioners to focus on removing the key dominant barriers and enabling them to deploy LSS concepts with environmental considerations smoothly.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 90
页数:27
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   Analyzing the benefits of lean manufacturing and value stream mapping via simulation: A process sector case study [J].
Abdulmalek, Fawaz A. ;
Rajgopal, Jayant .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2007, 107 (01) :223-236
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, J. Adv. Manage. Res., DOI [DOI 10.1108/97279810380000356, 10.1108/97279810380000356]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, INT J SUPPLY CHAIN M
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, SZCZUPLE ROZWIAZANIA
[5]  
Antony J., 2004, THE TQM MAGAZINE, P303, DOI DOI 10.1108/09544780410541945
[6]   Six sigma in small- and medium-sized UK manufacturing enterprises Some empirical observations [J].
Antony, Jiju ;
Kumar, Maneesh ;
Madu, Christian .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2005, 22 (08) :860-+
[7]   Lean Six Sigma for higher education institutions (HEIs) Challenges, barriers, success factors, tools/techniques [J].
Antony, Jiju ;
Krishan, Netasha ;
Cullen, Donna ;
Kumar, Maneesh .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 61 (08) :940-948
[8]  
Antony Jiju., 2002, MEAS BUS EXCELL, V6, P20, DOI [10.1108/13683040210451679, DOI 10.1108/13683040210451679]
[9]  
Arnheiter E., 2005, The TQM Magazine, V17, P5
[10]   Identification and classification of key variables and their role in environmental impact assessment: Methodology and software package INTRA [J].
Arya, DS ;
Abbasi, SA .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2001, 72 (03) :277-296