A study of the non-electrostatic interaction micelle/charged ligand:: A comparison of the results obtained by two different methods

被引：1

作者：

Jiménez, R ^{[1
]}

García-Fernández, E ^{[1
]}

Grueso, E ^{[1
]}

Fernández, I ^{[1
]}

Marín, I ^{[1
]}

Sanz, JJ ^{[1
]}

Torrado, LA ^{[1
]}

Villegas, D ^{[1
]}

González, L ^{[1
]}

Stürekow, HK ^{[1
]}

Leon, M ^{[1
]}

Lería, F ^{[1
]}

Machuca, EM ^{[1
]}

Martinez, LM ^{[1
]}

Morales, J ^{[1
]}

Villa-Bernaldez, I ^{[1
]}

Prado-Gotor, R ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Seville, Fac Quim, Dept Quim Fis, E-41012 Seville, Spain

来源：

CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS | 2006年 / 417卷 / 4-6期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1016/j.cplett.2005.10.074

中图分类号：

O64 [物理化学（理论化学）、化学物理学];

学科分类号：

070304 ; 081704 ;

摘要：

A kinetic study of the reaction between [Fe(CN)(6)](4-) (hexacyanoferrate (II)) and [Co(en)(2)Cl-2](+) (traits-dichlorobis cobalt(III) bis(ethylenediammine)) has been carried out in sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) micellar solutions containing NaCl. The results are discussed by using an approach based on the pseudophase model. Trends in the observed reactivity are explained by a change in the degree of association of one of the reactants ([Co(en)(2)Cl](+) in the present Letter) to the micelles, which depends on the surface potential of the micelles. The electrostatic and non-electrostatic components of the free energy of binding are determined by two different methods and the results of these determinations are compared. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：509 / 514

页数：6

共 50 条

[21] Determination of Acidity in Donor Milk: Comparison of Results Obtained by 2 Different Analytical Methods [J].

Escuder-Vieco, Diana ;

Vazquez-Roman, Sara ;

Sanchez-Pallas, Juan ;

Ureta-Velasco, Noelia ;

Mosqueda-Pena, Rocio ;

Rosa Pallas-Alonso, Carmen .

JOURNAL OF HUMAN LACTATION, 2016, 32 (04) :NP73-NP75

[22] Haptic recognition of shapes at different scales: A comparison of two methods of interaction [J].

Ziat, Mounia ;

Gapenne, Olivier ;

Stewart, John ;

Lenay, Charles .

INTERACTING WITH COMPUTERS, 2007, 19 (01) :121-132

[23] COMPARISON OF EVALUATION RESULTS OF NAILED JOINTS IN SHEAR PROPERTIES OBTAINED FROM TWO METHODS [J].

Ogawa, K. .

WOOD AND FIBER SCIENCE, 2019, 51 (04) :441-447

[24] Comparison of Gas Sensing Properties of Reduced Graphene Oxide Obtained by Two Different Methods [J].

Drewniak, Sabina ;

Procek, Marcin ;

Muzyka, Roksana ;

Pustelny, Tadeusz .

SENSORS, 2020, 20 (11) :1-18

[25] Comparison of Contouring Results for Prostate Cancer Treatment Planning Obtained by Two Different Specialists [J].

Cetin, Ilknur Alsan ;

Degerli, Ayse Dagli ;

Ergelen, Rabia ;

Ozgen, Erkan ;

Sevindik, Merve .

TURK ONKOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 31 (04) :128-133

[26] Comparison of Electrostatic Potential Obtained From Different Atomic Point Charges Calculation Methods for a Large Set of Molecules [J].

Emirik, Mustafa ;

Yilmaz, Sevil Savaskan .

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL BIOPHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2021, 20 (01) :13-21

[27] COMPARISON OF UNDRAINED SHEAR-STRENGTH RESULTS OBTAINED BY DIFFERENT TEST METHODS IN SOFT CLAYS [J].

EDEN, WJ ;

LAW, KT .

CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 1980, 17 (03) :369-381

[28] The comparison between results obtained by different evaluation methods in women body composition with fibromyalgia syndrome [J].

Torquato, Aline Cristina ;

Dias, Fabio Amarante ;

Wachholz, Luana Bertamoni ;

Nottar Nesello, Luciane Angela .

RBONE-REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE OBESIDADE NUTRICAO E EMAGRECIMENTO, 2019, 13 (77) :103-110

[29] Identification of IgE-binding egg white proteins: Comparison of results obtained by different methods [J].

Aabin, B ;

Poulsen, LK ;

Ebbehoj, K ;

Norgaard, A ;

Frokiaer, H ;

BindslevJensen, C ;

Barkholt, V .

INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 1996, 109 (01) :50-57

[30] ACIDITY OF ZSM-5 ZEOLITES - A COMPARISON OF RESULTS OBTAINED USING DIFFERENT EXPERIMENTAL METHODS [J].

SATYANARAYANA, CVV ;

CHAKRABARTY, DK .

INDIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY SECTION A-INORGANIC BIO-INORGANIC PHYSICAL THEORETICAL & ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1991, 30 (05) :422-427

← 1 2 3 4 5 →