Maternal body mass index as a predictor for delivery method

被引:46
作者
Pettersen-Dahl, Anita [1 ]
Murzakanova, Gulim [2 ]
Sandvik, Leiv [1 ,3 ]
Laine, Katariina [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Fac Med, Oslo, Norway
[2] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet, Pb 4965, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
[3] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Biostat, Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Dept Hlth Management & Hlth Econ, Inst Hlth & Soc, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Body mass index; cesarean delivery; instrumental delivery; obesity; overweight; VAGINAL BIRTH; CESAREAN-SECTION; WEIGHT-GAIN; PREGNANCY; OBESITY; RISK; OUTCOMES; COMPLICATIONS; ASSOCIATION; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.13265
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
IntroductionHigh maternal body mass index (BMI) is associated with complications during pregnancy and delivery such as gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders, perineal injuries and macrosomia. The aim of this study was to assess the association between maternal BMI and delivery method in non-breech, singleton deliveries, after 36weeks of gestation, in women with no more than one previous cesarean section, in Oslo University Hospital, Ulleval. Material and methodsThis retrospective register study used data from the hospital obstetrical database in 2011-2012, forming a cohort of 8821 women. Women were categorized into five different BMI classes and stratified into subgroups according to parity and previous cesarean delivery. Mode of delivery was categorized to spontaneous delivery, instrumental vaginal delivery, planned cesarean section and emergency cesarean section. ResultsIncidence of emergency cesarean delivery increased with increasing maternal BMI. Among primiparous women with overweight or obesity, the caesarean delivery rate was doubled (23.2 and 29.1%, respectively), compared with women with underweight or normal weight (12.5 and 13.7%). Also among parous women, maternal BMI 30 doubled the risk for cesarean delivery. The strongest risk factor for planned or emergency cesarean delivery was previous cesarean section [adjusted odds ratio 16.41 (confidence interval 12.19-22.08) and 8.72 (6.33-12.02), respectively]. Maternal BMI 30 increased the risk of planned cesarean delivery by 77%, and doubled the risk of emergency cesarean delivery. ConclusionsPrepregnancy BMI 30 was an independent risk factor for delivery by emergency cesarean section for both primiparous and parous women.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 218
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Pregnancy complications and outcomes among overweight and obese nulliparous women
    Baeten, JM
    Bukusi, EA
    Lambe, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2001, 91 (03) : 436 - 440
  • [2] Linear association between maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and risk of caesarean section in term deliveries
    Barau, G.
    Robillard, P-Y
    Hulsey, T. C.
    Dedecker, F.
    Laffite, A.
    Gerardin, P.
    Kauffmann, E.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 113 (10) : 1173 - 1177
  • [3] Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery
    Bhide, Amarnath
    Caric, Vedrana
    Arulkumaran, Sabaratnam
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2016, 133 (03) : 297 - 300
  • [4] Is vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat cesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery?
    Cahill, Alison G.
    Stamilio, David M.
    Odibo, Anthony O.
    Peipert, Jeffrey F.
    Ratcliffe, Sarah J.
    Stevens, Erika J.
    Sammel, Mary D.
    Macones, George A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 195 (04) : 1143 - 1147
  • [5] Association between pre-pregnancy obesity and the risk of cesarean delivery
    Crane, SS
    Wojtowycz, MA
    Dye, TD
    Aubry, RH
    Artal, R
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 89 (02) : 213 - 216
  • [6] Maternal pre-pregnancy overweight status and obesity as risk factors for cesarean delivery
    Dempsey, JC
    Ashiny, Z
    Qiu, CF
    Miller, RS
    Sorensen, TK
    Williams, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2005, 17 (03) : 179 - 185
  • [7] The impact of maternal obesity and weight gain on vaginal birth after cesarean section success
    Durnwald, CP
    Ehrenberg, HM
    Mercer, BM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (03) : 954 - 957
  • [8] Galtier-Dereure F, 2000, AM J CLIN NUTR, V71, p1242S, DOI 10.1093/ajcn/71.5.1242s
  • [9] Fetal size monitoring and birth-weight prediction: a new population-based approach
    Gjessing, H. K.
    Grottum, P.
    Okland, I.
    Eik-Nes, S. H.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 49 (04) : 500 - 507
  • [10] GROSS T, 1980, OBSTET GYNECOL, V56, P446