Do students use testing and feedback while learning? A focus on key concept definitions and learning to criterion

被引:35
作者
Dunlosky, John [1 ]
Rawson, Katherine A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kent State Univ, Dept Psychol, Kent, OH 44242 USA
关键词
Testing effect; Retrieval practice; Self-regulated learning; Feedback; Criterion learning; METACOGNITIVE CONTROL; LONG-TERM; RETRIEVAL PRACTICE; COLLEGE-STUDENTS; GOAL THEORY; ACHIEVEMENT; MODEL; ALLOCATION; TIME; METACOMPREHENSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.05.003
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
College students must regulate much of their learning and hence it is important to discover whether they use effective study techniques, such as testing with feedback. We conducted three experiments to evaluate the degree to which college students use testing with feedback as they are learning key concept definitions. The three main issues of interest concerned (a) whether students tested themselves during practice, (b) whether they followed tests with feedback, and (c) whether they continued to practice until they could correctly recall each definition one or more times. In each experiment, students in the selfregulated group could choose to engage in three activities (test, study, or evaluate test responses) in whatever order or dosage they wanted during practice. For purposes of comparison in each experiment, a Criterion 3 group completed an experimenter-controlled schedule of test-study practice until each definition was correctly recalled three times. All participants completed a final test one week later. Among the key outcomes, students who self-regulated their learning used tests and often sought feedback soon after. When students incorrectly recalled a definition, they typically chose to study the definition, whereas when they recalled some of a definition correctly, they typically chose to evaluate the quality of their response. Although students on average continued to test themselves until they correctly recalled each definition once, they underperformed on the final test as compared to the Criterion 3 group. Thus, in the present context, students do use testing while learning, but results also suggest that they do not take full advantage of this effective study technique. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 44
页数:13
相关论文
共 66 条
[11]   Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review [J].
Covington, MV .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 51 :171-200
[12]   What constrains the accuracy of metacomprehension judgments? Testing the transfer-appropriate-monitoring and accessibility hypotheses [J].
Dunlosky, J ;
Rawson, KA ;
Middleton, EL .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2005, 52 (04) :551-565
[13]   Causes and constraints of the shift-to-easier-materials effect in the control of study [J].
Dunlosky, J ;
Thiede, KW .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2004, 32 (05) :779-788
[14]  
Dunlosky J., 2002, Applied metacognition, P68
[15]   Metacomprehension: A brief history and how to improve its accuracy [J].
Dunlosky, John ;
Lipko, Amanda R. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 16 (04) :228-232
[16]   Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology [J].
Dunlosky, John ;
Rawson, Katherine A. ;
Marsh, Elizabeth J. ;
Nathan, Mitchell J. ;
Willingham, Daniel T. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, 2013, 14 (01) :4-58
[17]   Overconfidence produces underachievement: Inaccurate self evaluations undermine students' learning and retention [J].
Dunlosky, John ;
Rawson, Katherine A. .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2012, 22 (04) :271-280
[18]   SELF-REGULATED LEARNING AND THE ALLOCATION OF STUDY TIME [J].
Dunlosky, John ;
Ariel, Robert .
PSYCHOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MOTIVATION: ADVANCES IN RESEARCH AND THEORY, VOL 54, 2011, 54 :103-140
[19]   Improving college students' evaluation of text learning using idea-unit standards [J].
Dunlosky, John ;
Hartwig, Marissa K. ;
Rawson, Katherine A. ;
Lipko, Amanda R. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 64 (03) :467-484
[20]   Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals [J].
Elliot, AJ .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 1999, 34 (03) :169-189