Impact of Time-of-Flight and Point-Spread-Function in SUV Quantification for Oncological PET

被引:59
作者
Prieto, Elena [1 ]
Dominguez-Prado, Ines [1 ]
Jose Garcia-Velloso, Maria [1 ]
Penuelas, Ivan [1 ]
Angel Richter, Jose [1 ]
Maria Marti-Climent, Josep [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Navarra Clin, Dept Nucl Med, Pamplona 31008, Spain
关键词
PET; oncology; SUV; quantification;
D O I
10.1097/RLU.0b013e318279b9df
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Accuracy in the quantification of the SUV is a critical point in PET because proper quantification of tumor uptake is essential for therapy monitoring and prognosis evaluation. Recent advances such as time-of-flight (TOF) and point-spread-function (PSF) reconstructions have dramatically improved detectability. However, first experiences with these techniques have shown a consistent tendency to measure markedly high SUV values, bewildering nuclear medicine physicians and referring clinicians. Purpose: We investigated different reconstruction and quantification procedures to determine the optimum protocol for an accurate SUV quantification in last generation PET scanners. Methods: Both phantom and patient images were evaluated. A complete set of experiments was performed using a body phantom containing 6 spheres with different background levels and contrasts. Whole-body FDG PET/CT of 20 patients with breast and lung cancer was evaluated. One hundred five foci were identified by 2 experienced nuclear medicine physicians. Each acquisition was reconstructed both with classical and advanced (TOF, PSF) reconstruction techniques. Each sphere and each in vivo lesion was quantified with different parameters as follows: SUVmax, SUVmean, and SUV50 (mean within a 50% isocontour). Results: This study has confirmed that quantification with SUVmax produces important overestimation of metabolism in new generation PET scanners. This is a relevant result because, currently, SUVmax is the standard parameter for quantification. SUV50 has been shown as the best alternative, especially when applied to images reconstructed with PSF + TOF. Conclusions: SUV50 provides accurate quantification and should replace SUVmax in PET tomographs incorporating advanced reconstruction techniques. PSF + TOF reconstruction is the optimum for both detection and accurate quantification.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 109
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Variations in Clinical PET/CT Operations: Results of an International Survey of Active PET/CT Users [J].
Beyer, Thomas ;
Czernin, Johannes ;
Freudenberg, Lutz S. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2011, 52 (02) :303-310
[2]  
Boellaard R, 2004, J NUCL MED, V45, P1519
[3]   Need for Standardization of 18F-FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Assessments [J].
Boellaard, Ronald .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2011, 52 :93S-100S
[4]   FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0 [J].
Boellaard, Ronald ;
O'Doherty, Mike J. ;
Weber, Wolfgang A. ;
Mottaghy, Felix M. ;
Lonsdale, Markus N. ;
Stroobants, Sigrid G. ;
Oyen, Wim J. G. ;
Kotzerke, Joerg ;
Hoekstra, Otto S. ;
Pruim, Jan ;
Marsden, Paul K. ;
Tatsch, Klaus ;
Hoekstra, Corneline J. ;
Visser, Eric P. ;
Arends, Bertjan ;
Verzijlbergen, Fred J. ;
Zijlstra, Josee M. ;
Comans, Emile F. I. ;
Lammertsma, Adriaan A. ;
Paans, Anne M. ;
Willemsen, Antoon T. ;
Beyer, Thomas ;
Bockisch, Andreas ;
Schaefer-Prokop, Cornelia ;
Delbeke, Dominique ;
Baum, Richard P. ;
Chiti, Arturo ;
Krause, Bernd J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2010, 37 (01) :181-200
[5]   Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology [J].
Fletcher, James W. ;
Djulbegovic, Benjamin ;
Soares, Heloisa P. ;
Siegel, Barry A. ;
Lowe, Val J. ;
Lyman, Gary H. ;
Coleman, R. Edward ;
Wahl, Richard ;
Paschold, John Christopher ;
Avrill, Norbert ;
Einhorn, Lawrence H. ;
Suh, W. Warren ;
Samson'O, David ;
Delbekell, Dominique ;
Gorman, Mark ;
Shields, Anthony F. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2008, 49 (03) :480-508
[6]   Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner [J].
Jakoby, B. W. ;
Bercier, Y. ;
Conti, M. ;
Casey, M. E. ;
Bendriem, B. ;
Townsend, D. W. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (08) :2375-2389
[7]   Reducing between scanner differences in multi-center PET studies [J].
Joshi, Aniket ;
Koeppe, Robert A. ;
Fessler, Jeffrey A. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2009, 46 (01) :154-159
[8]   Benefit of time-of-flight in PET: Experimental and clinical results [J].
Karp, Joel S. ;
Surti, Sulernan ;
Daube-Witherspoon, Margaret E. ;
Muehllehner, Gerd .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2008, 49 (03) :462-470
[9]   SUVref: reducing reconstruction-dependent variation in PET SUV [J].
Kelly, Matthew D. ;
Declerck, Jerome M. .
EJNMMI RESEARCH, 2011, 1 :1-11
[10]   A CONCORDANCE CORRELATION-COEFFICIENT TO EVALUATE REPRODUCIBILITY [J].
LIN, LI .
BIOMETRICS, 1989, 45 (01) :255-268