Genetic analysis of bud necrosis disease caused by groundnut bud necrosis virus (GBNV) in tomato (Solanum lycopersicumL.)

被引:9
|
作者
Rai, Amarjeet Kumar [1 ]
Sadashiva, Avverahally Thammanna [1 ]
Basavaraj, Y. B. [2 ]
Venugopalan, Rangarajan [3 ]
Rao, Eguru Sreenivasa [1 ]
Nandeesha, P. [4 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Indian Inst Hort Res, Div Vegetable Crops, Bengaluru, India
[2] ICAR Indian Agr Res Inst, Div Plant Pathol, New Delhi, India
[3] ICAR Indian Inst Hort Res, Div Agr Stat, Bengaluru, India
[4] ICAR Indian Inst Hort Res, Div Biotechnol, Bengaluru, India
关键词
Genetic analysis; bud necrosis disease (BND); tospovirus; tomato; SPOTTED-WILT-VIRUS; RESISTANCE; TOSPOVIRUS; PEANUT; RICE; ATTRIBUTES; MANAGEMENT; YIELD;
D O I
10.1007/s10681-020-02657-z
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In the present study for the first-time genetics and nature of gene action for resistance to bud necrosis disease in tomato was deciphered based on mechanical sap inoculation under the environment-controlled glasshouse conditions with the pure culture of GBNV. To accomplish this study, two resistant (IIHR-2901 and IIHR-2953) and one susceptible parent (PKM-1) were used to generate F-1, F-2, BC(1)P(1)and BC(1)P(2)populations. Castle wright estimation suggested that the trait is governed by the single gene blocks in both the crosses. Chi-square estimation also indicated that the resistance to bud necrosis disease in the cross PKM-1 x IIHR-2901 is controlled by one or two recessive genes while in the cross PKM-1 x IIHR-2953, it was found to be governed by one or two dominant genes based on the segregation pattern observed in F(2)generation. However, the results remain inconclusive, as the segregation in backcrosses was not behaving as expected for both the crosses. This showed that the classical Mendelian genetics and additive-dominance model were inadequate to explain the genetical mechanism of resistance to bud necrosis disease of tomato. It may be either due to the presence of modifiers in the background or may be due to the presence of epistatic interactions. Later, in this study presence of epistatic interaction was confirmed by the significance of scaling test in both the crosses. Estimates of six parameters [m, d, h, i, j and l] through generation mean analysis, suggested the preponderance of non-allelic interactions mostly of additive x dominance [j] type with negative signs in both the crosses and additive x additive [i] interaction with positive sign in the cross between PKM-1 x IIHR-2953. Complementary type of epistasis has been observed for both the crosses as both the componentsviz.,dominance [h] and dominance x dominance [l] were in similar direction. Hence, all the above results indicated that the improvement for resistance to bud necrosis disease could be possible through recombination breeding, hybridization followed by selection at later generations with more emphasis on selection between families and lines.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [31] First report of Groundnut bud necrosis virus infecting wild species of Vigna, based on NP gene sequence characteristics
    Akram, Mohammad
    Naimuddin
    Pratap, Aditya
    Malviya, Nupur
    Yadav, Prashant
    PHYTOPATHOLOGIA MEDITERRANEA, 2013, 52 (03) : 532 - 540
  • [32] Biological characterization and variability of the nucleocapsid protein gene of Groundnut bud necrosis virus isolates infecting pea from India
    Akram, Mohammad
    Naimuddin
    PHYTOPATHOLOGIA MEDITERRANEA, 2012, 51 (02) : 266 - 275
  • [33] Sequence Diversity in the NSm Gene of Groundnut Bud Necrosis Virus Isolates Originating from Different Hosts and Locations in India
    Akram, Mohammad
    Naimuddin, Kamaal
    Jain, Rakesh K.
    JOURNAL OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2012, 160 (7-8) : 424 - 427
  • [34] Replicase gene mediated RNA silencing mechanism confers resistance against groundnut bud necrosis virus in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)
    Gandhi, Karthikeyan
    Murugesan, Suganyadevi
    Suppaiah, Rajamanickam
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2024, 170 (02) : 405 - 416
  • [35] Demonstration of helicase activity in the nonstructural protein, NSs, of the negative-sense RNA virus, Groundnut bud necrosis virus
    Bhushan, Lokesh
    Abraham, Ambily
    Choudhury, Nirupam Roy
    Rana, Vipin Singh
    Mukherjee, Sunil Kumar
    Savithri, Handanahal Subbarao
    ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY, 2015, 160 (04) : 959 - 967
  • [36] Development and application of reverse transcription-loop mediated isothermal amplification assay for sensitive detection of groundnut bud necrosis virus infecting potato
    Raigond, Baswaraj
    Pathania, Shruti
    Verma, Gaurav
    Bhardwaj, Pooja
    Kochhar, Tarvinder
    Chakrabarti, S. K.
    VIROLOGY, 2023, 587
  • [37] Effect of Temperature on Symptoms Expression and Viral RNA Accumulation in Groundnut Bud Necrosis Virus Infected Vigna unguiculata
    Singh, Ajeet
    Permar, Vipin
    Basavaraj
    Tomar, Bhoopal Singh
    Praveen, Shelly
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2018, 16 (03) : 227 - 234
  • [38] Groundnut Bud Necrosis Virus Encoded NSm Associates with Membranes via Its C-Terminal Domain
    Singh, Pratibha
    Indi, Shantinath S.
    Savithri, Handanahal S.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (06):
  • [39] Groundnut Bud Necrosis Virus Modulates the Expression of Innate Immune, Endocytosis, and Cuticle Development-Associated Genes to Circulate and Propagate in Its Vector, Thrips palmi
    Mahanta, Deepak Kumar
    Jangra, Sumit
    Priti
    Ghosh, Amalendu
    Sharma, Parva Kumar
    Iquebal, Mir Asif
    Jaiswal, Sarika
    Baranwal, Virendra Kumar
    Kalia, Vinay Kumari
    Chander, Subhas
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [40] Flagellin of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens works as a resistance inducer against groundnut bud necrosis virus in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)
    Rajamanickam, S.
    Nakkeeran, S.
    ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY, 2020, 165 (07) : 1585 - 1597