Genetic analysis of bud necrosis disease caused by groundnut bud necrosis virus (GBNV) in tomato (Solanum lycopersicumL.)

被引:9
|
作者
Rai, Amarjeet Kumar [1 ]
Sadashiva, Avverahally Thammanna [1 ]
Basavaraj, Y. B. [2 ]
Venugopalan, Rangarajan [3 ]
Rao, Eguru Sreenivasa [1 ]
Nandeesha, P. [4 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Indian Inst Hort Res, Div Vegetable Crops, Bengaluru, India
[2] ICAR Indian Agr Res Inst, Div Plant Pathol, New Delhi, India
[3] ICAR Indian Inst Hort Res, Div Agr Stat, Bengaluru, India
[4] ICAR Indian Inst Hort Res, Div Biotechnol, Bengaluru, India
关键词
Genetic analysis; bud necrosis disease (BND); tospovirus; tomato; SPOTTED-WILT-VIRUS; RESISTANCE; TOSPOVIRUS; PEANUT; RICE; ATTRIBUTES; MANAGEMENT; YIELD;
D O I
10.1007/s10681-020-02657-z
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In the present study for the first-time genetics and nature of gene action for resistance to bud necrosis disease in tomato was deciphered based on mechanical sap inoculation under the environment-controlled glasshouse conditions with the pure culture of GBNV. To accomplish this study, two resistant (IIHR-2901 and IIHR-2953) and one susceptible parent (PKM-1) were used to generate F-1, F-2, BC(1)P(1)and BC(1)P(2)populations. Castle wright estimation suggested that the trait is governed by the single gene blocks in both the crosses. Chi-square estimation also indicated that the resistance to bud necrosis disease in the cross PKM-1 x IIHR-2901 is controlled by one or two recessive genes while in the cross PKM-1 x IIHR-2953, it was found to be governed by one or two dominant genes based on the segregation pattern observed in F(2)generation. However, the results remain inconclusive, as the segregation in backcrosses was not behaving as expected for both the crosses. This showed that the classical Mendelian genetics and additive-dominance model were inadequate to explain the genetical mechanism of resistance to bud necrosis disease of tomato. It may be either due to the presence of modifiers in the background or may be due to the presence of epistatic interactions. Later, in this study presence of epistatic interaction was confirmed by the significance of scaling test in both the crosses. Estimates of six parameters [m, d, h, i, j and l] through generation mean analysis, suggested the preponderance of non-allelic interactions mostly of additive x dominance [j] type with negative signs in both the crosses and additive x additive [i] interaction with positive sign in the cross between PKM-1 x IIHR-2953. Complementary type of epistasis has been observed for both the crosses as both the componentsviz.,dominance [h] and dominance x dominance [l] were in similar direction. Hence, all the above results indicated that the improvement for resistance to bud necrosis disease could be possible through recombination breeding, hybridization followed by selection at later generations with more emphasis on selection between families and lines.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [21] Morphological and biochemical resistance traits of tomato cultivars against thrips and bud necrosis virus disease
    B Jamuna
    M Bheemanna
    Hn Timmanna
    Arunkumar Hosmani
    Kandapal Kavita
    International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 2021, 41 : 2957 - 2964
  • [22] Nucleocapsid protein gene mediated resistance against groundnut bud necrosis virus in tomato using sense and antisense constructs
    Raja, P.
    Jain, R. K.
    ACTA VIROLOGICA, 2011, 55 (03) : 283 - 284
  • [23] Harnessing Nanoencapsulated Bacillus spp. Consortia To Combat Groundnut Bud Necrosis Orthotospovirus in Tomato
    Kishorkumar C.
    Harish S.
    Karthikeyan G.
    Sharmila D.J.S.
    Nivedha M.
    ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, 2024, 16 (09) : 11185 - 11193
  • [24] Profiling of Groundnut bud necrosis orthotospovirus - responsive microRNA and their targets in tomato based on deep sequencing
    Nivedha, M.
    Harish, S.
    Angappan, K.
    Karthikeyan, G.
    Kumar, K. K.
    Murugan, M.
    Richard, J. Infant
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2024, 327
  • [25] Induction of innate immunity and plant growth promotion in tomato unveils the antiviral nature of bacterial endophytes against groundnut bud necrosis virus
    Sharanya, R.
    Gayathri, M.
    Renukadevi, P.
    Saranya, N.
    Suganthy, M.
    Varanavasiappan, S.
    Ghosh, Amalendu
    Nakkeeran, S.
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, 2025, 99 (02)
  • [26] Molecular characterization of emerging distinct watermelon bud necrosis virus (Orthotospovirus citrullonecrosis) variant causing necrosis disease on tomato in India
    Nagendran, K.
    Kumari, Shweta
    Vignesh, S.
    Pradeep, R. K. Mohana
    Reddy, Y. Suresh
    Bahadur, Anant
    Behera, Tusar Kanti
    PHYSIOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2024, 131
  • [27] In silico identification and validation of microRNAs from the genome of Solanum lycopersicum targeting Groundnut bud necrosis orthotospovirus
    Nivedha, M.
    Harish, S.
    Angappan, K.
    Karthikeyan, G.
    Kumar, K. K.
    Murugan, M.
    Jayakanthan, M.
    PHYSIOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2023, 127
  • [28] Direct Foliar Application of dsRNA Derived From the Full-Length Gene of NSs of Groundnut Bud Necrosis Virus Limits Virus Accumulation and Symptom Expression
    Gupta, Dipinte
    Singh, Oinam Washington
    Basavaraj, Y. B.
    Roy, Anirban
    Mukherjee, Sunil Kumar
    Mandal, Bikash
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2021, 12
  • [29] Influence of Groundnut bud necrosis virus on the Life History Traits and Feeding Preference of Its Vector, Thrips palmi
    Daimei, Guisuibou
    Raina, Harpreet Singh
    Devi, Pukhrambam Pushpa
    Saurav, Gunjan Kumar
    Renukadevi, Perumal
    Malathi, Varagur Ganesan
    Senthilraja, Chinnaiah
    Mandal, Bikash
    Rajagopal, Raman
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2017, 107 (11) : 1440 - 1445
  • [30] Engineered single-chain variable fragment antibody for immunodiagnosis of groundnut bud necrosis virus infection
    Maheshwari, Yogita
    Vijayanandraj, S.
    Jain, R. K.
    Mandal, Bikash
    ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY, 2015, 160 (05) : 1297 - 1301