Genetic analysis of bud necrosis disease caused by groundnut bud necrosis virus (GBNV) in tomato (Solanum lycopersicumL.)

被引:9
|
作者
Rai, Amarjeet Kumar [1 ]
Sadashiva, Avverahally Thammanna [1 ]
Basavaraj, Y. B. [2 ]
Venugopalan, Rangarajan [3 ]
Rao, Eguru Sreenivasa [1 ]
Nandeesha, P. [4 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Indian Inst Hort Res, Div Vegetable Crops, Bengaluru, India
[2] ICAR Indian Agr Res Inst, Div Plant Pathol, New Delhi, India
[3] ICAR Indian Inst Hort Res, Div Agr Stat, Bengaluru, India
[4] ICAR Indian Inst Hort Res, Div Biotechnol, Bengaluru, India
关键词
Genetic analysis; bud necrosis disease (BND); tospovirus; tomato; SPOTTED-WILT-VIRUS; RESISTANCE; TOSPOVIRUS; PEANUT; RICE; ATTRIBUTES; MANAGEMENT; YIELD;
D O I
10.1007/s10681-020-02657-z
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In the present study for the first-time genetics and nature of gene action for resistance to bud necrosis disease in tomato was deciphered based on mechanical sap inoculation under the environment-controlled glasshouse conditions with the pure culture of GBNV. To accomplish this study, two resistant (IIHR-2901 and IIHR-2953) and one susceptible parent (PKM-1) were used to generate F-1, F-2, BC(1)P(1)and BC(1)P(2)populations. Castle wright estimation suggested that the trait is governed by the single gene blocks in both the crosses. Chi-square estimation also indicated that the resistance to bud necrosis disease in the cross PKM-1 x IIHR-2901 is controlled by one or two recessive genes while in the cross PKM-1 x IIHR-2953, it was found to be governed by one or two dominant genes based on the segregation pattern observed in F(2)generation. However, the results remain inconclusive, as the segregation in backcrosses was not behaving as expected for both the crosses. This showed that the classical Mendelian genetics and additive-dominance model were inadequate to explain the genetical mechanism of resistance to bud necrosis disease of tomato. It may be either due to the presence of modifiers in the background or may be due to the presence of epistatic interactions. Later, in this study presence of epistatic interaction was confirmed by the significance of scaling test in both the crosses. Estimates of six parameters [m, d, h, i, j and l] through generation mean analysis, suggested the preponderance of non-allelic interactions mostly of additive x dominance [j] type with negative signs in both the crosses and additive x additive [i] interaction with positive sign in the cross between PKM-1 x IIHR-2953. Complementary type of epistasis has been observed for both the crosses as both the componentsviz.,dominance [h] and dominance x dominance [l] were in similar direction. Hence, all the above results indicated that the improvement for resistance to bud necrosis disease could be possible through recombination breeding, hybridization followed by selection at later generations with more emphasis on selection between families and lines.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Genetic analysis of bud necrosis disease caused by groundnut bud necrosis virus (GBNV) in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)
    Amarjeet Kumar Rai
    Avverahally Thammanna Sadashiva
    Y. B. Basavaraj
    Rangarajan Venugopalan
    Eguru Sreenivasa Rao
    P. Nandeesha
    Euphytica, 2020, 216
  • [2] Structural and Functional Analysis of Groundnut bud necrosis virus (GBNV) Using Computational and Biochemical Approaches
    Jamwal, Rohit
    Devi, Pukhrambam Pushpa
    Rani, Vaishali
    Rawat, Nitish
    Daimei, Guisuibou
    Saurav, Gunjan Kumar
    Renukadevi, Perumal
    Yadav, Karuna
    Rajagopal, Raman
    MOLECULAR BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2025, 67 (01) : 246 - 259
  • [3] Groundnut Bud Necrosis Virus (GBNV): A New Record for Mungbean in Pakistan
    Akhtar, Khalid Pervaiz
    Ullah, Najeeb
    Asghar, Muhammad Jawad
    Shahid, Muhammad
    JOURNAL OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2025, 173 (01)
  • [4] Identification of resistant sources in chilli (Capsicum sp.) genotypes to Groundnut bud necrosis virus (GBNV)
    Pavithra, B. S.
    Reddy, K. Madhavi
    Kedarnath, G.
    Reddy, M. Krishna
    AUSTRALASIAN PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2020, 49 (01) : 15 - 23
  • [5] Identification of resistant sources in chilli (Capsicum sp.) genotypes to Groundnut bud necrosis virus (GBNV)
    B. S. Pavithra
    K. Madhavi Reddy
    G. Kedarnath
    M. Krishna Reddy
    Australasian Plant Pathology, 2020, 49 : 15 - 23
  • [6] Exposure to watermelon bud necrosis virus and groundnut bud necrosis virus alters the life history traits of their vector, Thrips palmi (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)
    Ghosh, Amalendu
    Basavaraj, Y. B.
    Jangra, Sumit
    Das, Amrita
    ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY, 2019, 164 (11) : 2799 - 2804
  • [7] Antiviral activity of basidiomycetous fungi against Groundnut bud necrosis virus in tomato
    Sangeetha, B.
    Krishnamoorthy, A. S.
    Renukadevi, P.
    Malathi, V. G.
    Sharmila, D. Jeya Sundara
    Amirtham, D.
    PESTICIDE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 166
  • [8] NSs Encoded by Groundnut Bud Necrosis Virus Is a Bifunctional Enzyme
    Lokesh, Bhushan
    Rashmi, Panigrahi R.
    Amruta, Bhat S.
    Srisathiyanarayanan, Dharmaiah
    Murthy, Mathur R. N.
    Savithri, Handanahal S.
    PLOS ONE, 2010, 5 (03):
  • [9] Evaluation of watermelon genotypes against bud necrosis disease caused by a distinct watermelon bud necrosis orthotospovirus under field and glasshouse conditions
    Holkar, Somnath Kadappa
    Choudhary, Harshawardhan
    Mandal, Bikash
    Jain, Rakesh Kumar
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2018, 235 : 106 - 115
  • [10] Investigations on the RNA binding and phosphorylation of groundnut bud necrosis virus nucleocapsid protein
    Bhat, Amruta S.
    Savithri, H. S.
    ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY, 2011, 156 (12) : 2163 - 2172