Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues

被引:11
|
作者
Barrett, Doug J. K. [1 ]
Krumbholz, Katrin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Sch Psychol, Leicester, Leics, England
[2] MRC Inst Hearing Res, Nottingham, England
关键词
Exogenous attention; Intramodal; Crossmodal; Multisensory integration; TEMPORAL-ORDER JUDGMENTS; SPATIAL ATTENTION; TIME; PERCEPTION; MECHANISMS; COMPONENTS; REFLEXIVE; BENEFITS; BEHAVIOR; NEURONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00221-012-3191-8
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
This study reports an experiment investigating the relative effects of intramodal, crossmodal and bimodal cues on visual and auditory temporal order judgements. Pairs of visual or auditory targets, separated by varying stimulus onset asynchronies, were presented to either side of a central fixation (+/- 45A degrees), and participants were asked to identify the target that had occurred first. In some of the trials, one of the targets was preceded by a short, non-predictive visual, auditory or audiovisual cue stimulus. The cue and target stimuli were presented at the exact same locations in space. The point of subjective simultaneity revealed a consistent spatiotemporal bias towards targets at the cued location. For the visual targets, the intramodal cue elicited the largest, and the crossmodal cue the smallest, bias. The bias elicited by the bimodal cue fell between the intramodal and crossmodal cue biases, with significant differences between all cue types. The pattern for the auditory targets was similar apart from a scaling factor and greater variance, so the differences between the cue conditions did not reach significance. These results provide evidence for multisensory integration in exogenous attentional cueing. The magnitude of the bimodal cueing effect was equivalent to the average of the facilitation elicited by the intramodal and crossmodal cues. Under the assumption that the visual and auditory cues were equally informative, this is consistent with the notion that exogenous attention, like perception, integrates multimodal information in an optimal way.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 20
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues
    Doug J. K. Barrett
    Katrin Krumbholz
    Experimental Brain Research, 2012, 222 : 11 - 20
  • [2] Exogenous Bimodal Cues Attenuate Age-Related Audiovisual Integration
    Ren, Yanna
    Zhang, Ying
    Hou, Yawei
    Li, Junyuan
    Bi, Junhao
    Yang, Weiping
    I-PERCEPTION, 2021, 12 (03):
  • [3] Behavioral Measures of Multisensory Integration: Bounds on Bimodal Detection Probability
    Colonius, Hans
    BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2015, 28 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [4] Still no Evidence for Sustained Effects of Multisensory Integration of Duration
    de la Rosa, Maria D.
    Bausenhart, Karin M.
    MULTISENSORY RESEARCH, 2018, 31 (07) : 601 - 622
  • [5] Multisensory integration affects ERP components elicited by exogenous cues
    Santangelo, Valerio
    Van der Lubbe, Rob H. J.
    Belardinelli, Marta Olivetti
    Postma, Albert
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2008, 185 (02) : 269 - 277
  • [6] Multisensory integration affects ERP components elicited by exogenous cues
    Valerio Santangelo
    Rob H. J. Van der Lubbe
    Marta Olivetti Belardinelli
    Albert Postma
    Experimental Brain Research, 2008, 185 : 269 - 277
  • [7] Self as a prior: The malleability of Bayesian multisensory integration to social salience
    Scheller, Meike
    Fang, Huilin
    Sui, Jie
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 115 (02) : 185 - 205
  • [8] Behavioral Measures of Multisensory Integration: Bounds on Bimodal Detection Probability
    Hans Colonius
    Brain Topography, 2015, 28 : 1 - 4
  • [9] How cognitive aging affects multisensory integration of navigational cues
    Bates, Sarah L.
    Wolbers, Thomas
    NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING, 2014, 35 (12) : 2761 - 2769
  • [10] Motivationally Significant Stimuli Show Visual Prior Entry: Evidence for Attentional Capture
    West, Greg L.
    Anderson, Adam A. K.
    Pratt, Jay
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2009, 35 (04) : 1032 - 1042