Venous thromboembolism and cancer

被引:10
|
作者
MacLellan, Donald G. [1 ]
Richardson, Arthur [2 ,4 ]
Stoodley, Marcus A. [3 ]
机构
[1] NSW Minist Hlth, Hlth Serv Performance Improvement Branch, Sydney, NSW 2059, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
[3] Macquarie Univ, Australian Sch Adv Med, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
[4] Sydney Adventist Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
cancer; risk assessment; thromboembolism; MOLECULAR-WEIGHT HEPARIN; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; PULMONARY-EMBOLISM; DOUBLE-BLIND; DABIGATRAN ETEXILATE; KNEE REPLACEMENT; PREVENTION; PROPHYLAXIS; ENOXAPARIN; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06047.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains one of the most important causes of mortality and morbidity in the hospitalized patient. This is particularly evident in patients with cancer who are exposed to a four- to sixfold increased risk of VTE compared with those patients without cancer. Methods: A review of the current literature was undertaken on prophylaxis and management of VTE in patients with cancer. Results: Primary VTE prophylaxis is recognized to be the single most effective strategy that improves patient safety. Many clinical trials have demonstrated the benefit of primary prophylaxis for patients with cancer and evidence- based, best practice guidelines for specific subgroups of patients with cancer are well accepted by most clinicians. Despite this, many patients at high risk for VTE either receive no VTE prophylaxis or are exposed to VTE complications due to sub- optimal prophylaxis. Implementation of best practice guidelines still falls far short of clinical acceptable levels for VTE prophylaxis and management. Conclusion: VTE prevention in patients with cancer results in reduced morbidity and mortality, outcomes that are unquestionably attainable. This review of the current evidence supporting VTE prophylaxis in patients with cancer will hopefully act as a stimulus to provide patients with cancer access to the best, evidence- based, thromboprophylactic management available.
引用
收藏
页码:294 / 298
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] High incidence of venous thromboembolism despite electronic alerts for thromboprophylaxis in hospitalised cancer patients
    Lecumberri, Ramon
    Marques, Margarita
    Panizo, Elena
    Alfonso, Ana
    Garcia-Mouriz, Alberto
    Gil-Bazo, Ignacio
    Hermida, Jose
    Schulman, Sam
    Paramo, Jose A.
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2013, 110 (01) : 184 - 190
  • [32] Venous thromboembolism and cancer: pathophysiology and incidence
    Stricker, Hans
    VASA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR MEDICINE, 2014, 43 (04) : 239 - 243
  • [33] The treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer
    Prandoni, Paolo
    INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 5 : S27 - S30
  • [34] Cancer in males and risk of venous thromboembolism
    Beyer-Westendorf, Jan
    Werth, Sebastian
    Halbritter, Kai
    Weiss, Norbert
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2010, 125 : S155 - S159
  • [35] MANAGEMENT OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM IN CANCER PATIENTS
    Falanga, A.
    Russo, L.
    BLOOD TRANSFUSION, 2016, 14 : S648 - S652
  • [36] The Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer
    Prandoni, Paolo
    THROMBOSIS AND EMBOLISM: FROM RESEARCH TO CLINICAL PRACTICE, VOL 1, 2017, 906 : 123 - 135
  • [37] Venous thromboembolism and cancer: a systematic review
    Rodrigues, Celso Arrais
    Ferrarotto, Renata
    Kalil Filho, Roberto
    Novis, Yana A. S.
    Hoff, Paulo M. G.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2010, 30 (01) : 67 - 78
  • [38] Management of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer
    Noble, Simon
    Jenkins, Debbie A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2009, 70 (07) : 380 - 385
  • [39] Treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients
    Lee, Agnes Y. Y.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL HAEMATOLOGY, 2009, 22 (01) : 93 - 101
  • [40] Performance measures for improving the prevention of venous thromboembolism: achievement in clinical practice
    Wilson, Kenneth C.
    Merli, Geno J.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2011, 32 (03) : 293 - 302