Venous thromboembolism and cancer

被引:10
|
作者
MacLellan, Donald G. [1 ]
Richardson, Arthur [2 ,4 ]
Stoodley, Marcus A. [3 ]
机构
[1] NSW Minist Hlth, Hlth Serv Performance Improvement Branch, Sydney, NSW 2059, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
[3] Macquarie Univ, Australian Sch Adv Med, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
[4] Sydney Adventist Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
cancer; risk assessment; thromboembolism; MOLECULAR-WEIGHT HEPARIN; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; PULMONARY-EMBOLISM; DOUBLE-BLIND; DABIGATRAN ETEXILATE; KNEE REPLACEMENT; PREVENTION; PROPHYLAXIS; ENOXAPARIN; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06047.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains one of the most important causes of mortality and morbidity in the hospitalized patient. This is particularly evident in patients with cancer who are exposed to a four- to sixfold increased risk of VTE compared with those patients without cancer. Methods: A review of the current literature was undertaken on prophylaxis and management of VTE in patients with cancer. Results: Primary VTE prophylaxis is recognized to be the single most effective strategy that improves patient safety. Many clinical trials have demonstrated the benefit of primary prophylaxis for patients with cancer and evidence- based, best practice guidelines for specific subgroups of patients with cancer are well accepted by most clinicians. Despite this, many patients at high risk for VTE either receive no VTE prophylaxis or are exposed to VTE complications due to sub- optimal prophylaxis. Implementation of best practice guidelines still falls far short of clinical acceptable levels for VTE prophylaxis and management. Conclusion: VTE prevention in patients with cancer results in reduced morbidity and mortality, outcomes that are unquestionably attainable. This review of the current evidence supporting VTE prophylaxis in patients with cancer will hopefully act as a stimulus to provide patients with cancer access to the best, evidence- based, thromboprophylactic management available.
引用
收藏
页码:294 / 298
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Enoxaparin versus dalteparin or tinzaparin in patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism: The RIETECAT study
    Trujillo-Santos, Javier
    Farge-Bancel, Dominique
    Pedrajas, Jose Maria
    Gomez-Cuervo, Covadonga
    Ballaz, Aitor
    Braester, Andrei
    Mahe, Isabelle
    Villalobos, Aurora
    Antonio Porras, Jose
    Monreal, Manuel
    RESEARCH AND PRACTICE IN THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2022, 6 (04)
  • [22] Clinical guide SEOM on venous thromboembolism in cancer patients
    Munoz Martin, A. J.
    Font Puig, C.
    Navarro Martin, L. M.
    Borrega Garcia, P.
    Martin Jimenez, M.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 16 (12): : 1079 - 1090
  • [23] Risk stratification for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism
    Connolly, Gregory C.
    Khorana, Alok A.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL HAEMATOLOGY, 2009, 22 (01) : 35 - 47
  • [24] Prophylaxis and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients A Review
    Ansell, Jack E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2009, 32 (04): : S8 - S12
  • [25] Venous Thromboembolism After Surgical Treatment of Breast Cancer
    Momeni, Arash
    Fox, Justin P.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 80 (02) : 188 - 192
  • [26] Management of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: A review
    Piran, Siavash
    Schulman, Sam
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2018, 164 : S172 - S177
  • [27] Preoperative Enoxaparin Is Safe to Use in Major Gynecologic Surgery for Prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolism A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Martino, Martin A.
    George, Jennifer G.
    Chen, Christine C.
    Galic, Vijaya
    Kapoor, Rachna
    Murray, Kelly C.
    Shubella, Jocelyn
    Riker, Eva
    Lancaster, Johnathan M.
    Hoffman, Mitchel S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2012, 22 (04) : 681 - 685
  • [29] Venous thromboembolism Management in general practice
    Chapman, Nicola H.
    Brighton, Timothy
    Harris, Mark F.
    AUSTRALIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2009, 38 (1-2) : 36 - 40
  • [30] The Application of Current Proposed Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment Model for Ambulatory Patients With Cancer
    Abdel-Razeq, Hikmat
    Mansour, Asem
    Saadeh, Salwa S.
    Abu-Nasser, Mahmoud
    Makoseh, Mohammad
    Salam, Murad
    Abufara, Alaa
    Ismael, Yousef
    Ibrahim, Alaa
    Khirfan, Ghaleb
    Ibrahim, Mohammad
    CLINICAL AND APPLIED THROMBOSIS-HEMOSTASIS, 2018, 24 (03) : 429 - 433