Kinematics of the elbow during wheelchair propulsion: A comparison of two wheelchairs and two stroking techniques

被引:18
作者
Rudins, A
Laskowski, ER
Growney, ES
Cahalan, TD
An, KN
机构
[1] MAYO CLIN & MAYO FDN,DEPT PHYS MED & REHABIL,ROCHESTER,MN 55905
[2] MAYO CLIN & MAYO FDN,BIOMECH LAB,ROCHESTER,MN 55905
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 1997年 / 78卷 / 11期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90333-6
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: The kinematics of the elbow joint were studied for two types of wheelchairs and during two types of propulsive strokes. Participants: Ten serially selected healthy volunteers propelled a standard and a lightweight wheelchair on a roller system with both circular and pumping strokes. Design: Kinematic data for the wheelchair and the upper extremity were collected by an optical tracking system. These kinematic descriptors were subsequently time-normalized with a spline algorithm to provide a graphic description of the wheelchair strokes. Main Outcome Measures: Thirteen discrete variables were compared for the two chairs and the two propulsive strokes. Results: Total elbow motion ranged from 60.9 degrees of flexion to 5.2 degrees of extension. Maximal elbow flexion velocity ranged from 515.4 degrees to 572.8 degrees per second. Kinematic differences between the two wheelchairs were minimal, with a trend for 8.3 degrees to 5.2 degrees more elbow flexion in the lightweight wheelchair (p < .05), depending on the stroke used. With the use of any one chair, the style of the stroke had no significant effect on elbow kinematics, but the use of a pumping stroke did decrease propulsion are by 12 degrees to 14 degrees (p < .05). Conclusion: No major differences regarding elbow kinematics were seen between the two types of wheelchairs. The pumping-stroke technique resulted in a shortened handrim contact arc. (C) 1997 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:1204 / 1210
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] PHYSIOLOGICAL AND BIOMECHANICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WHEELCHAIR-DEPENDENT AND ABLE-BODIED SUBJECTS DURING WHEELCHAIR ERGOMETRY
    BROWN, DD
    KNOWLTON, RG
    HAMILL, J
    SCHNEIDER, TL
    HETZLER, RK
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 60 (03) : 179 - 182
  • [2] CERQUIGLINI S, 1981, BIOMECHANICS A, V7
  • [3] FERRARA MS, 1992, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V24, P184
  • [4] GASS GC, 1984, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V16, P355
  • [5] CARDIORESPIRATORY AND PERCEPTUAL RESPONSES TO ARM CRANK AND WHEELCHAIR EXERCISE USING VARIOUS HANDRIMS IN MALE PARAPLEGICS
    GAYLE, GW
    POHLMAN, RL
    GLASER, RM
    DAVIS, GM
    [J]. RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 1990, 61 (03) : 224 - 232
  • [6] GLASER RM, 1989, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V21, pS149
  • [7] PHYSIOLOGICAL-RESPONSES TO MAXIMAL EFFORT WHEELCHAIR AND ARM CRANK ERGOMETRY
    GLASER, RM
    SAWKA, MN
    BRUNE, MF
    WILDE, SW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1980, 48 (06) : 1060 - 1064
  • [8] NICHOLS PJR, 1979, SCAND J REHABIL MED, V11, P27
  • [9] STANDARD V LIGHTWEIGHT WHEELCHAIR PROPULSION IN SPINAL-CORD INJURED PATIENTS
    PARZIALE, JR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 1991, 70 (02) : 76 - 80
  • [10] Pushrim forces and joint kinetics during wheelchair propulsion
    Robertson, RN
    Boninger, ML
    Cooper, RA
    Shimada, SD
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1996, 77 (09): : 856 - 864