Renal replacement therapy registries-time for a structured data quality evaluation programme

被引:16
作者
Couchoud, Cecile [1 ]
Lassalle, Mathilde [1 ]
Cornet, Ronald [2 ]
Jager, Kitty J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Agence Biomed, REIN Registry, La Plaine St Denis, France
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Med Informat, ERA EDTA Registry, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
completeness; data quality; quality assessment; RRT registry; timeliness; validity; DATA-COLLECTION; DISEASE; HEMODIALYSIS; CARE;
D O I
10.1093/ndt/gft004
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Registries in the area of renal replacement therapy (RRT) are intended to be a tool for epidemiological research, health care planning and improvement of quality of care. In this perspective, the value of a population-based RRT registry and its ability to achieve its goals rely heavily on the quality of its data and on quality control procedures. Data quality is of crucial importance to prevent 'garbage coming out from garbage going in'. Regular evaluations of the data quality within these registries are needed to assess various aspects of data quality like completeness, prevention of duplicates, data validity, comparability, timeliness, usefulness and responsiveness of different items and accuracy of reporting and interpretation. In this technical note, we will discuss the purposes of RRT registries and the importance of different aspects of data quality in relation to those purposes. In addition, we discuss how these data quality aspects can be assessed and, where possible, how data quality may be improved.
引用
收藏
页码:2215 / 2220
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Am J Kidney Dis, V20, P84
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Am J Kidney Dis, V20, P68
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, AMIA ANN S P
[4]   Defining and improving data quality in medical registries: A literature review, case study, and generic framework [J].
Arts, DGT ;
de Keizer, NF ;
Scheffer, GJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2002, 9 (06) :600-611
[5]   Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: Principles and methods. Part I: Comparability, validity and timeliness [J].
Bray, Freddie ;
Parkin, D. Max .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (05) :747-755
[6]  
Burrows N. R., 2010, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V59, P1361
[7]   Assessment of urea removal in haemodialysis and the impact of the European Best Practice Guidelines [J].
Couchoud, Cecile ;
Jager, Kitty J. ;
Tomson, Charlie ;
Cabanne, Jean-Francois ;
Collart, Frederic ;
Finne, Patrik ;
de Francisco, Angel ;
Frimat, Luc ;
Garneata, Liliana ;
Leivestad, Torbjorn ;
Lemaitre, Vincent ;
Limido, Aurelio ;
Ots, Mai ;
Resic, Halima ;
Stojceva-Taneva, Olivera ;
Kooman, Jeroen .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 24 (04) :1267-1274
[8]   From registry data collection to international comparisons: examples of haemodialysis duration and frequency [J].
Couchoud, Cecile ;
Kooman, Jeroen ;
Finne, Patrik ;
Leivestad, Torbjorn ;
Stojceva-Taneva, Olivera ;
Ponikvar, Jadranka Buturovic ;
Collart, Frederic ;
Kramar, Reinhard ;
de Francisco, Angel ;
Jager, Kitty J. .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 24 (01) :217-224
[9]  
Gliklich RE, 2010, AHQR PUBLICATION, V10-EHC049
[10]  
Hofferkamp JE, 2010, STAND CANC REG, VIII