The Value of Carlsson-Dent Questionnaire in Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Area With Low Prevalence of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

被引:7
作者
Netinatsunton, Nisa [1 ]
Attasaranya, Siriboon [1 ]
Ovartlarnporn, Bancha [1 ]
Sangnil, Sulee [1 ]
Boonviriya, Sopa [1 ]
Piratvisuth, Teerha [1 ]
机构
[1] Prince Songkla Univ, Songklanagarind Hosp, NKC Inst Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Fac Med, Hat Yai 90110, Songkhla, Thailand
关键词
Diagnosis; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Questionnaires;
D O I
10.5056/jnm.2011.17.2.164
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background/Aims Symptom-based diagnosis for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been accepted in the population with high prevalence. Carlsson-Dent questionnaire (CDQ) is a standardized symptom-based diagnosis tool for GERD. The value of this tool in the population with low prevalence is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine CDQ performance for diagnosis of GERD in Thai population with low prevalence versus endoscopy or 24 hour pH monitoring. Methods Patients with dyspepsia by Rome II criteria were recruited. All patients completed a Thai version of CDQ and underwent endoscopic examination. Those without esophagitis or peptic ulcer and positive CDQ score took pH monitoring. Results One hundred patients (68 female) with mean age +/- SD of 45.6 +/- 12.4 years were recruited. Six with Los Angeles grade A esophagitis had negative CDQ score. In 44 with positive CDQ score, 3 had Los Angeles grade B esophagitis and 41 had pH monitoring done with 8 having positive test. The GERD diagnosis by CDQ was confirmed in 11 of 44 patients (25%). CDQ detected 11 out of 17 GERD detected by endoscopy and pH monitoring and the sensitivity of CDQ was 64%. Conclusions CDQ diagnosed more GERD in Thai population with low prevalence compared with endoscopy and pH monitoring. This may be due to some patients with functional heartburn were picked up by CDQ and some patients with GERD were not detected by endoscopy and pH monitoring.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 168
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Allison JA, 2005, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V129, P1756, DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.09.020
  • [2] Carlsson R, 1998, SCAND J GASTROENTERO, V33, P1023
  • [3] Lack of Correlation Between a Self-Administered Subjective GERD Questionnaire and Pathologic GERD Diagnosed by 24-h Esophageal pH Monitoring
    Chan, Kevin
    Liu, Geoffrey
    Miller, Linda
    Ma, Clement
    Xu, Wei
    Schlachta, Christopher M.
    Darling, Gail
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2010, 14 (03) : 427 - 436
  • [4] Epidemiology of gastrooesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review
    Dent, J
    El-Serag, HB
    Wallander, MA
    Johansson, S
    [J]. GUT, 2005, 54 (05) : 710 - 717
  • [5] Symptom assessment tools for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) treatment
    Fass, Ronnie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 41 (05) : 437 - 444
  • [6] Validation of a graded response questionnaire for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease in an Asian primary care population
    Ho, Khek-Yu
    Gwee, Kok Ann
    Khor, Jen Lock
    Selamat, Dede Sutedja
    Yeoh, Khay Guan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 42 (06) : 680 - 686
  • [7] Clinical application of Carlsson's questionnaire to predict erosive GERD among healthy Chinese
    Hung, CS
    Lee, CL
    Yang, JN
    Liao, PT
    Tu, TC
    Chen, TK
    Wu, CH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2005, 20 (12) : 1900 - 1905
  • [8] JOHNSON LF, 1974, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V62, P325
  • [9] Development of the GerdQ, a tool for the diagnosis and management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care
    Jones, R.
    Junghard, O.
    Dent, J.
    Vakil, N.
    Halling, K.
    Wernersson, B.
    Lind, T.
    [J]. ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 30 (10) : 1030 - 1038