Monetary Incentive and Stock Opinions on Social Media

被引:45
作者
Chen, Hailiang [1 ]
Hu, Yu Jeffrey [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Huang, Shan [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Business & Econ, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, China Program, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[3] Georgia Inst Technol, Business Analyt Ctr, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[4] Georgia Inst Technol, Master Sci Analyt Program, Scheller Coll Business, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[5] MIT, Initiat Digital Econ, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[6] Univ Washington, Foster Sch Business, Informat Syst & Operat Management, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
monetary incentive; stock opinions; social media; wisdom of crowds; investment advice; incentives in co-creation; PROPENSITY SCORE; PERFORMANCE; REPUTATION; FRAMEWORK; SENTIMENT; EARNINGS; REWARDS; WISDOM; IMPACT; NOISE;
D O I
10.1080/07421222.2019.1598686
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Not only is social media a new channel to obtain financial market information, it has also become a venue for investors to share and exchange investment ideas. We examine the performance consequences of providing monetary incentive to both existing and new amateur analysts on social media and its implications for online investor communities. We find that monetary incentive is effective in increasing the amount of content output and generating more interest from the community, but it leads to neither better nor worse stock recommendations. Additional analysis suggests that monetary incentive results in wider stock and industry coverage, a sign of increased content diversity. This study contributes to the understanding of the role of monetary incentive in stimulating the sharing of value-relevant information by investors in social media communities.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 417
页数:27
相关论文
共 39 条
[11]   Yahoo! for Amazon: Sentiment extraction from small talk on the web [J].
Das, Sanjiv R. ;
Chen, Mike Y. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (09) :1375-1388
[12]   A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation [J].
Deci, EL ;
Koestner, R ;
Ryan, RM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1999, 125 (06) :627-668
[13]   Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies [J].
Dehejia, RH ;
Wahba, S .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2002, 84 (01) :151-161
[14]   Pay enough or don't pay at all [J].
Gneezy, U ;
Rustichini, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2000, 115 (03) :791-810
[15]   What Drives Sell-Side Analyst Compensation at High-Status Investment Banks? [J].
Groysberg, Boris ;
Healy, Paul M. ;
Maber, David A. .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2011, 49 (04) :969-1000
[16]   Expert Stock Picker: The Wisdom of (Experts in) Crowds [J].
Hill, Shawndra ;
Ready-Campbell, Noah .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, 2011, 15 (03) :73-101
[17]   The Value of Crowdsourced Earnings Forecasts [J].
Jame, Russell ;
Johnston, Rick ;
Markov, Stanimir ;
Wolfe, Michael C. .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2016, 54 (04) :1077-1110
[18]   WHAT'S DIFFERENT ABOUT SOCIAL MEDIA NETWORKS? A FRAMEWORK AND RESEARCH AGENDA [J].
Kane, Gerald C. ;
Alavi, Maryam ;
Labianca, Giuseppe ;
Borgatti, Stephen P. .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2014, 38 (01) :275-304
[19]   Extrinsic versus Intrinsic Rewards for Contributing Reviews in an Online Platform [J].
Khern-am-nuai, Warut ;
Kannan, Karthik ;
Ghasemkhani, Hossein .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 (04) :871-892
[20]   Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence [J].
Li, Feng .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2008, 45 (2-3) :221-247