Extent of positive surgical margins following radical prostatectomy: impact on biochemical recurrence with long-term follow-up

被引:23
作者
Koskas, Yoann [1 ]
Lannes, Francois [1 ]
Branger, Nicolas [1 ]
Giusiano, Sophie [2 ]
Guibert, Nicolas [3 ,5 ]
Pignot, Geraldine [4 ]
Walz, Jochen [4 ]
Rossi, Dominique [1 ]
Bastide, Cyrille [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Nord Marseille, Dept Urol, Chemin Bourrely, F-13015 Marseille, France
[2] Hop Nord Marseille, Dept Anat Pathol, Chemin Bourrely, F-13015 Marseille, France
[3] CHU Lyon, Lyon, France
[4] Inst Paoli Calmettes, Dept Urol, F-13008 Marseille, France
[5] Hop Edouard Herriot, F-69003 Lyon, France
关键词
Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Biochemical recurrence; Positive surgical margins; Extent; Focal positive surgical margins; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY; CANCER; LOCATION; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1186/s12894-019-0470-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundTo assess the prognostic value of the extent of positive surgical margins (PSM) following radical prostatectomy (RP) on biochemical recurrence (BR) with long-term follow-up.MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed 1275 RPs performed between January 1992 and December 2013 in two university centers in Marseille (France). The inclusion criteria were: follow-up >24months, undetectable postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), no seminal vesicle (SV) invasion, no lymph node invasion confirmed by surgery (pN0) or imaging (pNx), and no neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment. BR was defined by PSA level0.2ng/mL on two successive samples. We included 189 patients, divided into two groups:- Focal PSM (fPSM): single PSM (sPSM) 3mm;- Extensive PSM (ePSM): sPSM with linear length>3mm or several margins regardless of the length.ResultsThe median follow-up was 101months (18-283) and the median age was 63years (46-76). BR occurred in only 12.1% (14/115) of cases involving fPSM and in 54.1% (40/74) of cases involving ePSM. In the multivariate model, ePSM patients were significantly associated with increased BR compared to fPSM (hazard ratio [HR]=6.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]=3.25-11.49). The ePSM significantly decreased BR-free survival (p<0.001) for every patient and every subgroup (pT2, pT3a, pG 6, and pG 7). The median BR time following RP was significantly shorter for ePSM patients than fPSM (57.2 vs. 89.2months p<0.001).ConclusionWith a median 8-year follow-up, ePSM was strongly associated with BR compared to fPSM. Therefore, it seems legitimate to monitor patients with fPSM. In cases of ePSM, adjuvant treatment appears effective.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] The Impact of Positive Surgical Margins on Mortality Following Radical Prostatectomy During the Prostate Specific Antigen Era
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Crispen, Paul L.
    Carlson, Rachel E.
    Rangel, Laureano J.
    Bergstralh, Eric J.
    Blute, Michael L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (03) : 1003 - 1009
  • [2] Early Salvage Radiation Therapy Does Not Compromise Cancer Control in Patients with pT3N0 Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: Results of a Match-controlled Multi-institutional Analysis
    Briganti, Alberto
    Wiegel, Thomas
    Joniau, Steven
    Cozzarini, Cesare
    Bianchi, Marco
    Sun, Maxine
    Tombal, Bertrand
    Haustermans, Karin
    Budiharto, Tom
    Hinkelbein, Wolfgang
    Di Muzio, Nadia
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Van Poppel, Hein
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 62 (03) : 472 - 487
  • [3] Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality
    Chalfin, Heather J.
    Dinizo, Michael
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Feng, Zhaoyong
    Partin, Alan W.
    Walsh, Patrick C.
    Humphreys, Elizabeth
    Han, Misop
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (11) : 1684 - 1689
  • [4] Dev HS, 2015, UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY SE
  • [5] Prognostic significance of location of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens
    Eastham, James A.
    Kurolwa, Kentaro
    Ohorl, Makoto
    Serlo, Angel M.
    Gorbonos, Alex
    Maru, Norio
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Slawin, Kevin M.
    Wheeler, Thomas M.
    Reuter, Victor E.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2007, 70 (05) : 965 - 969
  • [6] Reporting positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: time for standardization
    Fontenot, Philip A.
    Mansour, Ahmed M.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (08) : E290 - E299
  • [7] An evaluation of the decreasing incidence of positive surgical margins in a large retropubic prostatectomy series
    Han, M
    Partin, AW
    Chan, DY
    Walsh, PC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (01) : 23 - 26
  • [8] Focal Positive Surgical Margins Decrease Disease-free Survival After Radical Prostatectomy Even in Organ-confined Disease
    Lake, Alison M.
    He, Chang
    Wood, David P., Jr.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2010, 76 (05) : 1212 - 1216
  • [9] Lee S, 2015, CLIN GENITOURIN CANC
  • [10] The Impact of Solitary and Multiple Positive Surgical Margins on Hard Clinical End Points in 1712 Adjuvant Treatment-Naive pT2-4 N0 Radical Prostatectomy Patients
    Mauermann, Julian
    Fradet, Vincent
    Lacombe, Louis
    Dujardin, Thierry
    Tiguert, Rabi
    Tetu, Bernard
    Fradet, Yves
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 64 (01) : 19 - 25