Outcome of AngioJet mechanical thrombus aspiration in the treatment of acute lower extremities deep venous thrombosis

被引:36
|
作者
Xu, Yingjiang [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Xuemin [3 ]
Shang, Dan [4 ]
Liu, Jianyong [4 ]
Chen, Wei [5 ]
Han, Xinqiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Binzhou Med Univ Hosp, Dept Intervent Vasc Surg, 661 Huanghe Second Rd, Binzhou 256603, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Dept Biochem & Mol Biol, Key Lab Metab & Mol Med,Minist Educ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Binzhou Med Univ Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Binzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Union Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[5] Shengli Oilfield Cent Hosp, Dept Intervent Vasc, Dongying, Peoples R China
关键词
Deep venous thrombosis; AngioJet mechanical thrombus aspiration catheter-directed thrombolysis; treatment; CATHETER-DIRECTED THROMBOLYSIS; VEIN COMPRESSION SYNDROME; POSTTHROMBOTIC SYNDROME; RHEOLYTIC THROMBECTOMY; STATEMENT;
D O I
10.1177/1708538120958595
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objectives The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety in patients with acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis who underwent pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT, AngioJet mechanical thrombus aspiration). Methods In this retrospective, 424 consecutive patients with acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis from three institutions were enrolled in the study from January 2015 to December 2018. Of these, patients were divided into two groups, AngioJet group (n = 186) and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) group (n = 238). Evaluation indexes including limb circumference difference, length of stay (LOS), urokinase dosage, periprocedural complications, follow-up imaging findings and villalta scores were analyzed from the medical records. Results A total of 424 patients diagnosed with acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis were collected in this study. These patients were categorized into AngioJet group and CDT group. Significant differences were observed between the two groups with respect to the thigh circumference difference (5.32 +/- 1.85 cm vs. 4.69 +/- 2.15 cm;p = 0.04), calf circumference difference (2.79 +/- 1.54 cm vs. 2.35 +/- 1.25 cm;p = 0.01), thigh detumescence rate (72.19 +/- 19.55% vs. 65.35 +/- 17.26%;p = 0.00) and calf detumescence rate (62.79 +/- 18.56% vs. 55.75 +/- 17.27%;p = 0.00). The mean dose of urokinase in AngioJet group was 95.16 +/- 45.89 million IU significantly less than that in the CDT group 293.76 +/- 42.71 million IU (p = 0.00). The overall bleeding complication rate was 9.91% (19 patients in AngioJet group and 23 patients in CDT group), which included three major (0.71%, 3/424) and 39 minor (9.2%,39/424) events. In the AngioJet group, serum creatinine (sCr) concentration and urine erythrocyte from the hemolysis caused by the mechanical process were higher than baseline data at admission (p = 0.00,p = 0.00). The postoperative red blood cell and hemoglobin in two groups were lower than baseline data (p = 0.00,p = 0.00). Compared with CDT, AngioJet thrombectomy has significantly lower estimated incidence of PTS in the follow-up. Conclusion AngioJet thrombectomy has stronger clearance ability for acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis leading to significant reduction in the consumption of hospital resources, total dose of thrombolytic agents, and infusion time, thereby preventing adverse bleeding events, but patients with renal insufficiency should be careful. Ideal short-term and medium-term efficacy and safety are certain.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 423
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mechanical thrombectomy device AngioJet™ is effective for the treatment of acute deep venous thrombosis
    Han, Xinqiang
    Zhao, Baolei
    Wang, Xuemin
    Wang, Wenming
    Ma, Chao
    Wang, Zhu
    Zhao, Peng
    Wu, Jian
    Teng, Mujian
    BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-INDIA, 2017, 28 (11): : 5084 - 5088
  • [2] Application of AngioJet thrombus aspiration device for treatment of acute iliofemoral vein thrombosis
    Song, Jinhua
    He, Xu
    Zhao, Boxiang
    Shi, Wanying
    Gu, Jianping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2019, 12 (06): : 7517 - 7526
  • [3] The effect of Angiojet rheolytic thrombectomy in the endovascular treatment of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis
    Dumantepe, Mert
    Uyar, Ibrahim
    PHLEBOLOGY, 2018, 33 (06) : 388 - 396
  • [4] The Efficacy and Safety of AngioJet Rheolytic Thrombectomy in the Treatment of Subacute Deep Venous Thrombosis in Lower Extremity
    Song, Xiao-jun
    Liu, Zhi-li
    Zeng, Rong
    Liu, Chang-wei
    Ye, Wei
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 58 : 295 - 301
  • [5] Treatment of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis: A strategy of thrombus removal
    Comerota, A. J.
    Paolini, D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2007, 33 (03) : 351 - 360
  • [6] Mid-term outcome of endovascular treatment for acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis
    Jiang, Kun
    Li, Xiao-Qiang
    Sang, Hong-Fei
    Qian, Ai-Min
    Rong, Jian-Jie
    Li, Cheng-Long
    PHLEBOLOGY, 2017, 32 (03) : 200 - 206
  • [7] Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Massive Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis
    Shi, Hong-Jian
    Huang, You-Hua
    Shen, Tao
    Xu, Qiang
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2011, 21 (01) : 50 - 53
  • [8] Treatment of symptomatic lower extremity acute deep venous thrombosis: Role of mechanical thrombectomy
    Biuckians, Andre
    Meier, George H., III
    VASCULAR, 2007, 15 (05) : 297 - 303
  • [9] Effectiveness of pigtail catheter crushing combined with AngioJet mechanical aspiration for treatment of acute left iliofemoral vein thrombosis
    Zheng, Xuexun
    Xue, Ming
    Zhou, Yadong
    Guan, Yunbiao
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 45 (01) : 226 - 231
  • [10] A case-controlled study on AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis in the treatment of acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis
    Zhu, Jun
    Ni, Cai-Fang
    Dai, Zhen-Yu
    Yao, Li-Zheng
    Li, Wen-Hui
    VASCULAR, 2020, 28 (02) : 177 - 182