Female butterflies modulate investment in reproduction and flight in response to monsoon-driven migrations

被引:15
作者
Bhaumik, Vaishali [1 ,2 ]
Kunte, Krushnamegh [1 ]
机构
[1] Tata Inst Fundamental Res, Natl Ctr Biol Sci, GKVK Campus,Bellary Rd, Bangalore 560065, Karnataka, India
[2] Shanmugha Arts Sci Technol & Res Acad SASTRA Univ, Tirumalaisamudram 613401, Thanjavur, India
关键词
SEX-BIASED DISPERSAL; DANAUS-PLEXIPPUS; PARARGE-AEGERIA; INSECT FLIGHT; RESOURCE-ALLOCATION; MONARCH BUTTERFLIES; FALL MIGRATION; TRADE-OFFS; EVOLUTION; MORPHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1111/oik.04593
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Migratory species may display striking phenotypic plasticity during individual lifetimes. This may include differential investment in body parts and functions, differential resource use and allocation, and behavioural changes between migratory and non-migratory phases. While migration-related phenotypic changes are well-reported, their underlying mechanisms are usually poorly understood. Here we compare individuals from migratory (reproductive diapause) and non-migratory (reproductive) phases of closely related aposematic butterfly species to study how sexual dimorphism and migratory behaviour underlie significant morphological tradeoffs, and propose a plausible scenario to explain the migration-related phenotypic plasticity observed in females of migratory species. We found that female butterflies invested significantly more in their abdominal mass compared to males irrespective of their migratory phase, and underwent a clear shift in their body mass allocation after the switch from the reproductive diapause phase to the reproductive phase. In reproductive phase, females invested much more in reproductive tissue. This switch occurred as a result of increased abdominal mass (i.e. reproductive tissue mass) without significant reduction in the thoracic mass (i.e. flight muscle mass). Migratory males, however, were not significantly different from non-migratory males in terms of relative investment in flight and reproductive tissues. These patterns were consistent between migratory and non-migratory aposematic species within and across clades. While migratory habits may influence the physiology and behaviour of both sexes, long-distance migration affected female morphology much more markedly compared to that of males. These results show the sex-specific nature of adaptations to migratory behaviour, and suggest that seemingly disparate life-history traits such as aposematism and migration may have similar influences on the lifetime energetic investments of insects.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 296
页数:12
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   How migrants get there:: Migratory performance and orientation [J].
Akesson, Susanne ;
Hedenstrom, Anders .
BIOSCIENCE, 2007, 57 (02) :123-133
[2]   Long-distance migration:: evolution and determinants [J].
Alerstam, T ;
Hedenström, A ;
Åkesson, S .
OIKOS, 2003, 103 (02) :247-260
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Nortest: tests for normality. R package version 1
[4]   Insect Fat Body: Energy, Metabolism, and Regulation [J].
Arrese, Estela L. ;
Soulages, Jose L. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENTOMOLOGY, 2010, 55 :207-225
[5]  
Beenakkers A.M.T., 1981, P53
[6]   INSECT FLIGHT-MUSCLE METABOLISM [J].
BEENAKKERS, AMT ;
VANDERHORST, DJ ;
VANMARREWIJK, WJA .
INSECT BIOCHEMISTRY, 1984, 14 (03) :243-260
[7]   Does flight morphology relate to flight performance?: An experimental test with the butterfly Pararge aegeria [J].
Berwaerts, K ;
Van Dyck, H ;
Aerts, P .
FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2002, 16 (04) :484-491
[8]   On the sex-specific mechanisms of butterfly flight:: flight performance relative to flight morphology, wing kinematics, and sex in Pararge aegeria [J].
Berwaerts, Koen ;
Aerts, Peter ;
Van Dyck, Hans .
BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 2006, 89 (04) :675-687
[9]  
Bhaumik V., 2017, DATA FEMALE BUTTERFL
[10]  
Boggs Carol L., 1994, P25