Essentiality and Transcriptome-Enriched Pathway Scores Predict Drug-Combination Synergy

被引:8
作者
Li, Jin [1 ]
Huo, Yang [2 ]
Wu, Xue [1 ]
Liu, Enze [2 ]
Zeng, Zhi [1 ]
Tian, Zhen [1 ]
Fan, Kunjie [1 ]
Stover, Daniel [3 ]
Cheng, Lijun [1 ]
Li, Lang [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Biomed Informat, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Sch Informat & Comp, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Div Med Oncol, Dept Med, Columbus, OH 43202 USA
来源
BIOLOGY-BASEL | 2020年 / 9卷 / 09期
关键词
drug-combination synergy prediction; drug target; gene essentiality; gene expression; KEGG pathway; SIGNALING PATHWAY; TUMOR SAMPLES; CANCER; RESISTANCE; RESOURCE; CELLS; AMPK;
D O I
10.3390/biology9090278
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In the prediction of the synergy of drug combinations, systems pharmacology models expand the scope of experiment screening and overcome the limitations of current computational models posed by their lack of mechanical interpretation and integration of gene essentiality. We therefore investigated the synergy of drug combinations for cancer therapies utilizing records in NCI ALMANAC, and we employed logistic regression to test the statistical significance of gene and pathway features in that interaction. We trained our predictive models using 43 NCI-60 cell lines, 165 KEGG pathways, and 114 drug pairs. Scores of drug-combination synergies showed a stronger correlation with pathway than gene features in overall trend analysis and a significant association with both genes and pathways in genome-wide association analyses. However, we observed little overlap of significant gene expressions and essentialities and no significant evidence that associated target and non-target genes and their pathways. We were able to validate four drug-combination pathways between two drug combinations, Nelarabine-Exemestane and Docetaxel-Vermurafenib, and two signaling pathways, PI3K-AKT and AMPK, in 16 cell lines. In conclusion, pathways significantly outperformed genes in predicting drug-combination synergy, and because they have very different mechanisms, gene expression and essentiality should be considered in combination rather than individually to improve this prediction.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 18
页数:18
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Combinatorial drug therapy for cancer in the post-genomic era
    Al-Lazikani, Bissan
    Banerji, Udai
    Workman, Paul
    [J]. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 30 (07) : 679 - 691
  • [2] Use of Precision Medicine Molecular Profiling of Baseline Tumor Specimen May Not Benefit Outcomes in Children With Relapsed or Refractory Pediatric Sarcomas
    Carter, J.
    Cheng, L.
    Zucker, J.
    Marshall, M.
    Pollok, K.
    Murray, M.
    Li, L.
    Renbarger, J.
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 101 (03) : 328 - 330
  • [3] Systematic synergy modeling: understanding drug synergy from a systems biology perspective
    Chen, Di
    Liu, Xi
    Yang, Yiping
    Yang, Hongjun
    Lu, Peng
    [J]. BMC SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, 2015, 9
  • [4] NLLSS: Predicting Synergistic Drug Combinations Based on Semi-supervised Learning
    Chen, Xing
    Ren, Biao
    Chen, Ming
    Wang, Quanxin
    Zhang, Lixin
    Yan, Guiying
    [J]. PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2016, 12 (07)
  • [5] A genome-wide positioning systems network algorithm for in silico drug repurposing
    Cheng, Feixiong
    Lu, Weiqiang
    Liu, Chuang
    Fang, Jiansong
    Hou, Yuan
    Handy, Diane E.
    Wang, Ruisheng
    Zhao, Yuzheng
    Yang, Yi
    Huang, Jin
    Hill, David E.
    Vidal, Marc
    Eng, Charis
    Loscalzo, Joseph
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 10 (1)
  • [6] Network-based prediction of drug combinations
    Cheng, Feixiong
    Kovacs, Istvan A.
    Barabasi, Albert-Laszlo
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 10 (1)
  • [7] Rapid targeted mutational analysis of human tumours: a clinical platform to guide personalized cancer medicine
    Dias-Santagata, Dora
    Akhavanfard, Sara
    David, Serena S.
    Vernovsky, Kathy
    Kuhlmann, Georgiana
    Boisvert, Susan L.
    Stubbs, Hannah
    McDermott, Ultan
    Settleman, Jeffrey
    Kwak, Eunice L.
    Clark, Jeffrey W.
    Isakoff, Steven J.
    Sequist, Lecia V.
    Engelman, Jeffrey A.
    Lynch, Thomas J.
    Haber, Daniel A.
    Louis, David N.
    Ellisen, Leif W.
    Borger, Darrell R.
    Lafrate, A. John
    [J]. EMBO MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2010, 2 (05) : 146 - 158
  • [8] Ensemble Prediction of Synergistic Drug Combinations Incorporating Biological, Chemical, Pharmacological, and Network Knowledge
    Ding, Pingjian
    Yin, Rui
    Luo, Jiawei
    Kwoh, Chee-Keong
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2019, 23 (03) : 1336 - 1345
  • [9] Differential crosstalk between the AMPK and PI3K/Akt pathways in breast cancer cells of differing genotypes: Leptin inhibits the effectiveness of AMPK activation
    El-Masry, Omar S.
    Al-Sakkaf, Kaltoom
    Brown, Barry L.
    Dobson, Pauline R. M.
    [J]. ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2015, 34 (04) : 1675 - 1680
  • [10] Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing
    Frampton, Garrett M.
    Fichtenholtz, Alex
    Otto, Geoff A.
    Wang, Kai
    Downing, Sean R.
    He, Jie
    Schnall-Levin, Michael
    White, Jared
    Sanford, Eric M.
    An, Peter
    Sun, James
    Juhn, Frank
    Brennan, Kristina
    Iwanik, Kiel
    Maillet, Ashley
    Buell, Jamie
    White, Emily
    Zhao, Mandy
    Balasubramanian, Sohail
    Terzic, Selmira
    Richards, Tina
    Banning, Vera
    Garcia, Lazaro
    Mahoney, Kristen
    Zwirko, Zac
    Donahue, Amy
    Beltran, Himisha
    Mosquera, Juan Miguel
    Rubin, Mark A.
    Dogan, Snjezana
    Hedvat, Cyrus V.
    Berger, Michael F.
    Pusztai, Lajos
    Lechner, Matthias
    Boshoff, Chris
    Jarosz, Mirna
    Vietz, Christine
    Parker, Alex
    Miller, Vincent A.
    Ross, Jeffrey S.
    Curran, John
    Cronin, Maureen T.
    Stephens, Philip J.
    Lipson, Doron
    Yelensky, Roman
    [J]. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2013, 31 (11) : 1023 - +