Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided interlaminar epidural block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: a retrospective comparative study

被引:29
|
作者
Park, Ki Deok [1 ]
Lee, Woo Yong [2 ]
Nam, Sang Hyun [3 ]
Kim, Myounghwan [4 ]
Park, Yongbum [5 ]
机构
[1] Gachon Univ, Gil Med Ctr, Dept Rehabil Med, Incheon, South Korea
[2] Inje Univ, Coll Med, Sanggye Paik Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Inje Univ, Coll Med, Sanggye Paik Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Inje Univ, Coll Med, Sanggye Paik Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Inje Univ, Coll Med, Sanggye Paik Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Sanggye 7 Dong 761-7, Seoul 139707, South Korea
关键词
Ultrasound; Fluoroscopy; Injection; Cervical; STEROID INJECTIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s40477-018-0344-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeRecent studies have compared the therapeutic efficacy and safety of the procedure using ultrasound and fluoroscopy. However, there are no published studies comparing the therapeutic efficacy and safety of fluoroscopy (FL)-guided cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection (CIESI) with that of ultrasound (US)-guided selective nerve root block (SNRB). This study aimed to compare the mid-term effects and advantages of US-guided SNRB with FL-guided CIESI for radicular pain in the lower cervical spine through assessment of pain relief and functional improvement.MethodsPatients with radicular pain in the lower cervical spine who received US-guided SNRB (n=51) or FL-guided CIESI (n=61) were included in this retrospective study. All procedures were performed using FL or US. The complication frequencies during the procedures, adverse events, treatment effects, and functional improvement were compared at intervals of 1, 3, and 6months after the last injection.ResultsBoth the neck disability index and verbal numeric scale showed improvements at 1, 3, and 6months after the last injection in both groups, with no significant differences between groups (p<0.05). Furthermore, the treatment success rate at all time points was not significantly different between groups. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the injection method (US- or FL-guided), sex, analgesic use, pain duration, number of injections, and age were not independent predictors of treatment success. Blood was aspirated before injection in 8% (n=5) and 0% of patients in the FL-guided and US-guided groups, respectively. In seven patients of the FL-guided group, intravascular contrast spread was noted during injection.ConclusionsOur results suggest that, compared with FL-guided CIESI, US-guided SNRB requires a shorter administration duration while providing similar pain relief and functional improvements.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 177
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultrasound-Guided Selective Nerve Root Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Interlaminar Epidural Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Transforaminal Epidural Block for the Treatment of Radicular Pain in the Lower Cervical Spine: A Retrospective Comparative Study
    Jang, Jin Hyuk
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Kim, Jong Woo
    Cho, Kyoung Rai
    Nam, Sang Hyun
    Park, YongBum
    PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2020, 2020
  • [2] Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided interlaminar epidural block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: a retrospective comparative study
    Ki Deok Park
    Woo Yong Lee
    Sang Hyun Nam
    Myounghwan Kim
    Yongbum Park
    Journal of Ultrasound, 2019, 22 : 167 - 177
  • [3] Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Selective Nerve Root Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Interlaminar Epidural Injection for Cervical Radicular Pain: A Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Study
    Kose, Halil Cihan
    Kose, Selin Guven
    Celikel, Feyza
    Tulgar, Serkan
    Akkaya, Omer Taylan
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2024, 14 (07):
  • [4] Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: A randomized, blinded, controlled study
    Haemi Jee
    Ji Hae Lee
    Jongwoo Kim
    Ki Deok Park
    Woo Yong Lee
    Yongbum Park
    Skeletal Radiology, 2013, 42 : 69 - 78
  • [5] Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: A randomized, blinded, controlled study
    Jee, Haemi
    Lee, Ji Hae
    Kim, Jongwoo
    Park, Ki Deok
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Park, Yongbum
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 42 (01) : 69 - 78
  • [6] Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided lumbar selective nerve root block: a retrospective comparative study
    Bowen Wang
    Yang Sun
    Jitao Zhang
    Hailan Meng
    Hong Zhang
    Lequn Shan
    Scientific Reports, 14
  • [7] Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided lumbar selective nerve root block: a retrospective comparative study
    Wang, Bowen
    Sun, Yang
    Zhang, Jitao
    Meng, Hailan
    Zhang, Hong
    Shan, Lequn
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [8] Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Intercostal Nerve Block Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Epidural Nerve Block in Patients With Thoracic Herpes Zoster: A Comparative Study
    Lee, Hyo Jeong
    Park, Hong Souk
    Moon, Hyun Im
    Yoon, Seo Yeon
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (03) : 725 - 730
  • [9] Ultrasound-Guided Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Unilateral Lower Lumbar Radicular Pain Case-Controlled, Retrospective, Comparative Study
    Park, Ki Deok
    Kim, Tai Kon
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Ahn, JaeKi
    Koh, Sung Hoon
    Park, Yongbum
    MEDICINE, 2015, 94 (50)
  • [10] Combined Ultrasound and Fluoroscopy versus Ultrasound versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Unilateral Lower Lumbar Radicular Pain: A Retrospective Comparative Study
    Lee, Dong Yuk
    Park, Yongbum
    Song, Jun Hyeong
    Ahn, Jaeki
    Cho, Kyung Hwan
    Kim, Suyeon
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2024, 60 (05):