Comparing self-perceived and estimated fracture risk by FRAX® of women with osteoporosis

被引:2
作者
Baji, Petra [1 ,2 ]
Gulacsi, Laszlo [1 ]
Horvath, Csaba [3 ]
Brodszky, Valentin [1 ]
Rencz, Fanni [1 ]
Pentek, Marta [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Corvinus Univ Budapest, Dept Hlth Econ, Fovam Ter 8, H-1093 Budapest, Hungary
[2] Praha 1,Politickych Veznu 7, Prague 11121, Czech Republic
[3] Semmelweis Univ, Fac Med, Dept Internal Med 1, Koranyi Sandor U 2-A, H-1083 Budapest, Hungary
[4] Flor Ferenc Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, Semmelweis Ter 1, H-2143 Budapest, Hungary
基金
匈牙利科学研究基金会;
关键词
Osteoporosis; FRAX (R); Risk perception; Subjective risk; Hungary; PERCEPTION; PREVENTION; BEHAVIOR; METAANALYSIS; HUNGARY; PREDICTION; DIAGNOSIS; ACCURACY; THERAPY; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s11657-016-0300-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In this study, we compared subjective fracture risks of Hungarian women with osteoporosis to FRAX (R)-based estimates. Patients with a previous fracture, parental hip fracture, low femoral T-score, higher age, and higher BMI were more likely to underestimate their risks. Patients also failed to associate risk factors with an increased risk of fractures. Purpose The main objectives were to explore associations between self-perceived 10-year fracture risks of women with osteoporosis (OP) and their risks calculated by the FRAX (R) algorithm and to identify determinants of the underestimation of risk. Methods We carried out a cross-sectional study in 11 OP centers in Hungary and collected data on the risk factors considered by the FRAX (R)-calculator. Patients estimated their subjective 10-year probability of any major osteoporotic and hip fracture numerically, in percentages and also on a visual analog scale (VAS). We compared subjective and FRAX (R) estimates and applied logistic regression to analyze the determinants of the underestimation of risk. Associations between risk factors and subjective risk were explored using linear probability models. Results Nine hundred seventy-two OP patients were included in the analysis. Major OP and hip fracture risk by FRAX (R) were on average 20.1 and 10.5%, while subjective estimates were significantly higher, 30.0 and 24.7%, respectively. Correlations between FRAX (R) and subjective measures were very weak (r = 0.12-0.16). Underestimation of major OP fracture risk was associated with having had a single previous fracture (OR = 2.0), parental hip fracture (OR = 3.4), femoral T-score <=-2.5 (OR = 4.2), higher age, body mass index, and better general health state. We did not find significant associations between subjective risk estimates and most of the risk factors except for previous fractures. Conclusions Hungarian OP patients fail to recognize most of the risk factors of fractures. Thus, education of patients about these risk factors would be beneficial especially for the elderly with a low femoral T-score and parental hip fracture history.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] NEW APPROACH TO EXPLAINING SICK-ROLE BEHAVIOR IN LOW-INCOME POPULATIONS
    BECKER, MH
    DRACHMAN, RH
    KIRSCHT, JP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1974, 64 (03) : 205 - 216
  • [2] Prevention of cervical cancer in low-resource settings
    Boncz, I
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (11): : 1248 - 1248
  • [3] Financial deficits in the health services of the UK and Hungary
    Boncz, Imre
    Sebestyen, Andor
    [J]. LANCET, 2006, 368 (9539) : 917 - 918
  • [4] Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: The example of vaccination
    Brewer, Noel T.
    Chapman, Gretchen B.
    Gibbons, Frederick X.
    Gerrard, Meg
    McCaul, Kevin D.
    Weinstein, Neil D.
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 26 (02) : 136 - 145
  • [5] Clinician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis
    Cosman, F.
    de Beur, S. J.
    LeBoff, M. S.
    Lewiecki, E. M.
    Tanner, B.
    Randall, S.
    Lindsay, R.
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 25 (10) : 2359 - 2381
  • [6] Measuring Risk Perceptions: What Does the Excessive Use of 50% Mean?
    de Bruin, Waendi Bruine
    Carman, Katherine G.
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2012, 32 (02) : 232 - 236
  • [7] Variations in subjective breast cancer risk estimations when using different measurements for assessing breast cancer risk perception
    Eibner, Frauke
    Barth, Jurgen
    Helmes, Almut
    Bengel, Jurgen
    [J]. HEALTH RISK & SOCIETY, 2006, 8 (02) : 197 - 210
  • [8] A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory
    Floyd, DL
    Prentice-Dunn, S
    Rogers, RW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 30 (02) : 407 - 429
  • [9] Fracture Risk Perception Study: Patient Self-Perceptions of Bone Health Often Disagree with Calculated Fracture Risk
    Grover, Michael L.
    Edwards, Frederick D.
    Chang, Yu-Hui H.
    Cook, Curtiss B.
    Behrens, Margaret C.
    Dueck, Amylou C.
    [J]. WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2014, 24 (01) : E69 - E75
  • [10] The Measurement of Subjective Probability: Evaluating the Sensitivity and Accuracy of Various Scales
    Haase, Niels
    Renkewitz, Frank
    Betsch, Cornelia
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2013, 33 (10) : 1812 - 1828