Carbon capture and storage: Lessons from a storage potential and localization analysis

被引:64
作者
Selosse, Sandrine [1 ]
Ricci, Olivia [2 ]
机构
[1] PSL Res Univ, MINES ParisTech, Ctr Appl Math, Rue Claude Daunesse,CS 10207, F-06907 Sophia Antipolis, France
[2] Univ Reunion, Fac Law & Econ, 15 Ave Rene Cassin,CS 62003, St Denis 97744 9, Reunion, France
关键词
Carbon capture and storage; Carbon storage potential; Carbon transport cost; Climate scenario; Long-term modeling; CO2; STORAGE; SALINE AQUIFERS; CAPACITY ESTIMATION; BIOMASS ENERGY; POWER SECTOR; ETSAP-TIAM; BIO-ENERGY; CCS; CHINA; TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.117
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The challenges of climate change involve totally rethinking the world's energy system. In particular, CCS technologies are still presented as a solution to reach ambitious climate targets. However, avoiding the required Gt of CO2 emissions by investing in CCS technologies supposes the development of carbon storage capacities. This analysis, conducted with TIAM-FR and based on a wide review of geological storage potential and various data, aims to discuss the impact of this potential on the development of the CCS option. We also specify a scenario allowing the exclusion of onshore storage due to a hypothetic policy considering public resistance to onshore storage, and carbon transport costs variation effects. The implementation of CCS is less impacted by the level of carbon storage potential - except in the lowest case of availability - than by the type of sequestration site. However, the development of CCS is lower at the end of the period in the case of a decrease in carbon storage potential. Indeed, the question of type of storage site appears to have a greater impact, with an arbitrage between deep saline aquifers and depleted basins and enhanced recovery. Doubling the cost of carbon transport does not limit the penetration of carbon capture technologies, but it does impact the choice of site. Finally, a limitation of onshore storage could have a significant impact on the penetration of the CCS option. The explanation for this limited deployment of CCS is thus the higher cost of offshore storage more than the level of storage potential. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 44
页数:13
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, CO2 Capture and Storage - a Key Carbon Abatement Option
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, GLOBAL CARBON DIOXID
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ENERGY J
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Energy Technology Perspectives 2016
[5]   Carbon capture and storage from fossil fuels and biomass -: Costs and potential role in stabilizing the atmosphere [J].
Azar, Christian ;
Lindgren, Kristian ;
Larson, Eric ;
Moellersten, Kenneth .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2006, 74 (1-3) :47-79
[6]   The feasibility of low CO2 concentration targets and the role of bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) [J].
Azar, Christian ;
Lindgren, Kristian ;
Obersteiner, Michael ;
Riahi, Keywan ;
van Vuuren, Detlef P. ;
den Elzen, K. Michel G. J. ;
Moellersten, Kenneth ;
Larson, Eric D. .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2010, 100 (01) :195-202
[7]   Screening and ranking of sedimentary basins for sequestration of CO2 in geological media in response to climate change [J].
Bachu, S .
ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2003, 44 (03) :277-289
[8]   CO2 storage capacity estimation:: Methodology and gaps [J].
Bachu, Stefan ;
Bonijoly, Didier ;
Bradshaw, John ;
Burruss, Robert ;
Holloway, Sam ;
Christensen, Niels Peter ;
Mathiassen, Odd Magne .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2007, 1 (04) :430-443
[9]  
Bock B., 2003, DEFC2600NT40937
[10]  
Bodansky D., 2016, AM J INT LA IN PRESS, V110