Improving CAT bond pricing models via machine learning

被引:7
作者
Goetze, Tobias [1 ]
Guertler, Marc [1 ]
Witowski, Eileen [1 ]
机构
[1] Braunschweig Inst Technol, Dept Finance, Abt Jerusalem Str 7, D-38106 Braunschweig, Germany
关键词
CAT bond; Machine learning; Linear regression; Risk premium; INSURANCE; SAMPLE; RISK; SELECTION; RETURNS;
D O I
10.1057/s41260-020-00167-0
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Enhanced machine learning methods provide an encouraging alternative to forecast asset prices by extending or generalizing the possible model specifications compared to conventional linear regression methods. Even if enhanced methods of machine learning in the literature often lead to better forecasting quality, this is not clear for small asset classes, because in small asset classes enhanced machine learning methods may potentially over-fit the in-sample data. Against this background, we compare the forecasting performance of linear regression models and enhanced machine learning methods in the market for catastrophe (CAT) bonds. We use linear regression with variable selection, penalization methods, random forests and neural networks to forecast CAT bond premia. Among the considered models, random forests exhibit the highest forecasting performance, followed by linear regression models and neural networks.
引用
收藏
页码:428 / 446
页数:19
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2018, Pricing cat bonds: Regression and machine learning-some observations, some lessons
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2004, Geneva Papers: Etudes et Dossiers
  • [3] Arnott R, 2019, The Journal of Financial Data Science, V1, P64, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3275654, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3275654]
  • [4] Barrieu P., 2020, ARXIV200110393
  • [5] Tiebreaker: Certification and Multiple Credit Ratings
    Bongaerts, Dion
    Cremers, K. J. Martijn
    Goetzmann, William N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2012, 67 (01) : 113 - 152
  • [6] Credit ratings as coordination mechanisms
    Boot, AWA
    Milbourn, TT
    Schmeits, A
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2006, 19 (01) : 81 - 118
  • [7] Pricing in the Primary Market for Cat Bonds: New Empirical Evidence
    Braun, Alexander
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND INSURANCE, 2016, 83 (04) : 811 - 847
  • [8] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [9] Predicting excess stock returns out of sample: Can anything beat the historical average?
    Campbell, John Y.
    Thompson, Samuel B.
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2008, 21 (04) : 1509 - 1531
  • [10] Differences of opinion and selection bias in the credit rating industry
    Cantor, R
    Packer, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 1997, 21 (10) : 1395 - 1417