Decreased number of positive surgical margins in radical retropubic prostatectomy

被引:0
作者
Braun, PM
Meyer-Schell, K
Seif, C
Hautmann, S
Leuschner, I
Klöppel, G
Jünemann, KP
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Schleswig Holstein, Klin Urol & Kinderurol, D-24105 Kiel, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Schleswig Holstein, Inst Pathol, D-24105 Kiel, Germany
来源
UROLOGE | 2005年 / 44卷 / 11期
关键词
prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; positive surgical margins; frozen section;
D O I
10.1007/s00120-005-0898-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Therapeutic success and prognosis in RRP is determined by negative surgical margins. In order to minimize the proportion of positive surgical margins in the final histological evaluation, valid intraoperative control by means of frozen margin analysis is indispensable. We have developed and evaluated a new frozen margin procedure based on the Stanford method with transverse and sagittal cut directions. This technique facilitates comprehensive intraoperative evaluation of curved margin areas for the first time. Retrospective analysis of the results of the new frozen section technique revealed positive surgical margins in 2.7% of patients. The results obtained with this new technique were significantly superior to those obtained with two established techniques (10.3%, P: <= 0.001; 17.2%, P <= 0.001). Our results demonstrate that the new frozen margin technique is clearly more sensitive for intraoperative detection of positive margins and thus leads to substantially higher rates of negative surgical margins.
引用
收藏
页码:1324 / 1331
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Intraoperative and perioperative morbidity of contemporary radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1243 patients: Results of a single center between 1999 and 2002 [J].
Augustin, H ;
Hammerer, P ;
Graefen, M ;
Palisaar, R ;
Noldus, J ;
Fernandez, S ;
Huland, H .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 43 (02) :113-118
[2]   Pathologic comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens [J].
Brown, JA ;
Garlitz, C ;
Gomella, LG ;
Hubosky, SG ;
Diamond, SM ;
McGinnis, D ;
Strup, SE .
UROLOGY, 2003, 62 (03) :481-486
[3]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Preliminary pathologic evaluation [J].
Fromont, G ;
Guillonneau, B ;
Validire, P ;
Vallancien, G .
UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (04) :661-665
[4]   Management of a positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy: Decision analysis - Editorial comment [J].
Brawer, MK .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (01) :100-100
[5]   Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer recurrence and the use of secondary cancer treatment: Data from the CaPSURE database [J].
Grossfeld, GD ;
Chang, JJ ;
Broering, JM ;
Miller, DP ;
Yu, J ;
Flanders, SC ;
Henning, JM ;
Stier, DM ;
Carroll, PR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (04) :1171-1177
[6]   Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients [J].
Hull, GW ;
Rabbani, F ;
Abbas, F ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Kattan, MW ;
Scardino, PT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (02) :528-534
[7]  
ISHII J, 2004, ANN M AM UR ASS SAN
[8]   Identification of factors predicting response to adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy [J].
Kamat, AM ;
Babaian, K ;
Cheung, MR ;
Naya, Y ;
Huang, SH ;
Kuban, D ;
Babaian, RJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (05) :1860-1863
[9]   Probability of biochemical recurrence by analysis of pathologic stage, gleason score, and margin status for localized prostate cancer [J].
Khan, MA ;
Partin, AW ;
Mangold, LA ;
Epstein, JI ;
Walsh, PC .
UROLOGY, 2003, 62 (05) :866-871
[10]   Cancer statistics, 1999 [J].
Landis, SH ;
Murray, T ;
Bolden, S ;
Wingo, PA .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1999, 49 (01) :8-31