Is Longer Always Better? A Comparison of the Validity of Single-item Versus Multiple-item Measures of Life Satisfaction

被引:116
作者
Jovanovic, Veljko [1 ]
Lazic, Milica [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Novi Sad, Fac Philosophy, Dept Psychol, Dr Zorana Dindica 2, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia
关键词
Single-item measure; Life satisfaction; Validity; Test-retest reliability; Age; Gender; DOUBLY CONCRETE CONSTRUCTS; CONTINUUM-SHORT-FORM; SELF-EFFICACY; MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; SCALE; RELIABILITY; PANAS; PERSONALITY; GUIDELINES; EMOTIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s11482-018-9680-6
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The aim of this research was to examine the validity of a single-item life satisfaction scale by comparing it with the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). Three studies were conducted on a total of six samples of Serbian undergraduate students, adults, and elderly (totalN = 2822). We examined: 1) correlations between a single-item measure of life satisfaction and the SWLS; 2) convergent and criterion-related validity of the two measures; 3) age and gender differences in life satisfaction as measured with the two measures; 4) test-retest reliability of the two measures. The SWLS and the single-item measure were strongly correlated across six samples (meanr = .70). The validity of the two scales was supported, and they generally yielded similar correlations with other constructs. The 10-month test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) was .56 for the SWLS, and .43 for the single-item scale. No consistent gender differences were observed in life satisfaction as measured by both scales among students and adults, but men reported substantially higher life satisfaction than women on SWLS among the elderly. We found that age differences in life satisfaction can depend on the scale used. The present findings support the use of single-item scales of life satisfaction, but also highlight a need for more research beyond validity and reliability of single-item life satisfaction measures.
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 692
页数:18
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, PERS WELLB IND AD PW
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, PERS WELLB IND
[3]   Life Satisfaction Across the Lifespan: Findings from Two Nationally Representative Panel Studies [J].
Baird, Brendan M. ;
Lucas, Richard E. ;
Donnellan, M. Brent .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2010, 99 (02) :183-203
[4]   The nature of doubly concrete constructs and how to identify them [J].
Bergkvist, Lars .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 (09) :3427-3429
[5]   Just one question: If one question works, why ask several? [J].
Bowling, A .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2005, 59 (05) :342-345
[6]   A Review of the Tripartite Structure of Subjective Well-Being: Implications for Conceptualization, Operationalization, Analysis, and Synthesis [J].
Busseri, Michael A. ;
Sadava, Stan W. .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2011, 15 (03) :290-314
[7]  
Cantril H., 1965, The pattern of human concerns
[8]   Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: results from three large samples [J].
Cheung, Felix ;
Lucas, Richard E. .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 23 (10) :2809-2818
[9]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences., V2nd, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4684-5439-0_2, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587, 10.4324/9780203771587]
[10]   Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: a predictive validity perspective [J].
Diamantopoulos, Adamantios ;
Sarstedt, Marko ;
Fuchs, Christoph ;
Wilczynski, Petra ;
Kaiser, Sebastian .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2012, 40 (03) :434-449