Romosozumab in Skeletally Mature Adults with a Fresh Unilateral Tibial Diaphyseal Fracture A Randomized Phase-2 Study

被引:32
作者
Bhandari, Mohit [1 ]
Schemitsch, Emil H. [2 ]
Karachalios, Theofilos [3 ]
Sancheti, Parag [4 ]
Poolman, Rudolf W. [5 ]
Caminis, John [6 ]
Daizadeh, Nadia [7 ]
Dent-Acosta, Ricardo E. [7 ]
Egbuna, Ogo [7 ]
Chines, Arkadi [7 ]
Miclau, Theodore [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Surg, London, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Thessalia, Sch Hlth Sci, Orthopaed Dept UGHL, Thessalia, Larissa, Greece
[4] Sancheti Inst Orthopaed & Rehabil, Pune, Maharashtra, India
[5] OLVG, Joint Res, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Sanofi Genzyme, Bridgewater, NJ USA
[7] Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA USA
[8] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthopaed Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
[9] Zuckerberg San Francisco Gen Hosp, Orthopaed Trauma Inst, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; DOUBLE-BLIND; SCLEROSTIN; TRAUMA; SHAFT;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.19.01008
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Romosozumab is an antibody that binds and inhibits sclerostin, thereby increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption. A double-blinded, randomized, phase-2, dose-finding trial was performed to evaluate the effect of romosozumab on the radiographic and clinical outcomes of surgical fixation of tibial diaphyseal fractures. Methods: Patients (18 to 82 years old) were randomized 3:1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1 to a placebo or 1 of 9 romosozumab treatment groups. Patients received subcutaneous injections of romosozumab or the placebo postoperatively on day 1 and weeks 2, 6, and 12. The primary outcome was the time to radiographic evidence of healing ("radiographic healing") analyzed after the week-24 assessments had been completed for all patients. Results: A total of 402 patients were randomized: 299 to the romosozumab group and 103 to the placebo group. The median time to radiographic healing (the primary outcome) ranged from 14.4 to 18.6 weeks in the romosozumab groups and was 16.4 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.6 to 18.0 weeks) in the placebo group, which was not a significant difference. There was also no significant difference in the median time to clinical healing, no relationship between romosozumab dose/frequency and unplanned revision surgery, and no apparent treatment benefit in terms of physical function. The safety and tolerability profile of romosozumab was comparable with that of the placebo. Conclusions: Romosozumab did not accelerate tibial fracture-healing in this patient population. Additional studies of patients at higher risk for delayed healing are needed to explore the potential of romosozumab to accelerate tibial fracture-healing.
引用
收藏
页码:1416 / 1426
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Barcak EA, 2017, ORTHOP CLIN N AM, V48, P301, DOI [10.1016/j.ocl.2017.03.004, 10.1016/j.oc1.2017.03.004]
  • [2] Development and preliminary validation of a Function IndeX for Trauma (FIX-IT)
    Bhandari, Mohit
    Wasserman, Scott M.
    Yurgin, Nicole
    Petrisor, Brad
    Sprague, Sheila
    Dent, Ricardo E.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 56 (05) : E114 - E120
  • [3] Randomized Trial of Reamed and Unreamed Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Shaft Fractures
    Bhandari, Mohit
    Guyatt, Gordon
    Tornetta, Paul, III
    Schemitsch, Emil H.
    Swiontkowski, Marc
    Sanders, David
    Walter, Stephen D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A (12) : 2567 - 2578
  • [4] Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis
    Cosman, F.
    Crittenden, D. B.
    Adachi, J. D.
    Binkley, N.
    Czerwinski, E.
    Ferrari, S.
    Hofbauer, L. C.
    Lau, E.
    Lewiecki, E. M.
    Miyauchi, A.
    Zerbini, C. A. F.
    Milmont, C. E.
    Chen, L.
    Maddox, J.
    Meisner, P. D.
    Libanati, C.
    Grauer, A.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (16) : 1532 - 1543
  • [5] Factors affecting fracture healing after intramedullary nailing of the tibial diaphysis for closed and grade I open fractures
    Drosos, GI
    Bishay, M
    Karnezis, IA
    Alegakis, AK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2006, 88B (02): : 227 - 231
  • [6] A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk
    Fine, JP
    Gray, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 94 (446) : 496 - 509
  • [7] In Patients with a Tibial Fracture, Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound After Intramedullary Nail Fixation Did Not Accelerate Radiographic Healing or Improve Functional Recovery
    Garner, Matthew R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2017, 99 (16)
  • [8] Deficits in preference-based health-related quality of life after complications associated with tibial fracture
    Gitajn, I. L.
    Titus, A. J.
    Tosteson, A. N.
    Sprague, S.
    Jeray, K.
    Petrisor, B.
    Swiontkowski, M.
    Bhandari, M.
    Slobogean, G.
    [J]. BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2018, 100B (09) : 1227 - 1233
  • [9] Infection following fractures of the proximal tibia - a systematic review of incidence and outcome
    Henkelmann, Ralf
    Frosch, Karl-Heinz
    Glaab, Richard
    Lill, Helmut
    Schoepp, Christian
    Seybold, Dominik
    Josten, Christoph
    Hepp, Pierre
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2017, 18
  • [10] Sclerostin monoclonal antibody therapy with AMG 785: a potential treatment for osteoporosis
    Lewiecki, E. Michael
    [J]. EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY, 2011, 11 (01) : 117 - 127