Advances of 3T MR Imaging in Visualizing Trabecular Bone Structure of the Calcaneus Are Partially SNR-Independent: Analysis Using Simulated Noise in Relation to Micro-CT, 1.5T MRI, and Biomechanical Strength

被引:11
作者
Bauer, Jan S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Monetti, Roberto [3 ]
Krug, Roland [2 ]
Matsuura, Maiko [4 ]
Mueller, Dirk [1 ,3 ]
Eckstein, Felix [5 ]
Rummeny, Ernst J. [1 ]
Lochmueller, Eva-Maria [6 ]
Raeth, Christoph W. [3 ]
Link, Thomas M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Radiol, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Max Planck Inst Extraterr Phys, D-37075 Garching, Germany
[4] Univ Munich, Inst Anat, D-80539 Munich, Germany
[5] Parcelsus Private Med Univ, Inst Anat & Musculoskeletal Res, Salzburg, Austria
[6] Univ Munich, Dept Gynecol 1, D-80539 Munich, Germany
关键词
3T; MR imaging; osteoporosis; signal to noise ratio (SNR); susceptibility; trabecular bone structure analysis; PROXIMAL FEMUR; SPATIAL-RESOLUTION; IN-VIVO; MINERAL DENSITY; NON-GAUSSIANITY; DISTAL RADIUS; 3.0; T; IMAGES; ARCHITECTURE; QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.21625
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate differences in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of trabecular bone at 1.5T and 3.0T and to specifically study noise effects on the visualization and quantification of trabecular architecture using conventional histomorphometric and nonlinear measures of bone structure. Materials and Methods: Sagittal MR images of 43 calcaneus specimens (donor age: 81 10 years) were acquired at 1.5T and 3.0T using gradient echo sequences. Noise was added to obtain six sets of images with decreasing signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). Micro-CT images were obtained from biopsies taken from 37 calcaneus samples and bone strength was determined. Morphometric and nonlinear Structure parameters were calculated in all datasets. Results: Originally, SNR was 1.5 times higher at 3.0T. In the simulated image sets, SNR was similar at both fields. Trabecular dimensions measured by LCT were adequately estimated by MR]. with residual errors (e.), ranging from 16% to 2.7% at 3.0T. Comparing e. at similar SNR. 3.0T consistently displayed lower errors than 1.5T (eg. bone fraction at SNR approximate to 4: e(r)[3.0T] = 15%; e(r)[1.5T] = 21%, P < 0.05). Conclusion: The advances of 3.0T compared to 1.5T in visualizing trabecular bone structure are partially SNR-independent. The better performance at 3.0T may be explained by pronounced susceptibility. enhancing the visualization of thin trabecular structures.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 140
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Autocalibrating parallel imaging of in vivo trabecular bone micro architecture at 3 Tesla [J].
Banerjee, S. ;
Choudhury, S. ;
Han, E. T. ;
Brau, A. C. S. ;
Morze, C. V. ;
Vigneron, D. B. ;
Majumdar, S. .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2006, 56 (05) :1075-1084
[2]   Volumetric cartilage measurements of porcine knee at 1.5-T and 3.0-T MR imaging: Evaluation of precision and accuracy [J].
Bauer, Jan S. ;
Krause, Stefanie J. ;
Ross, Christian J. ;
Krug, Roland ;
Carballido-Gamio, Julio ;
Ozhinsky, Eugene ;
Majumdar, Sharmila ;
Link, Thomas M. .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 241 (02) :399-406
[3]   Structural analysis of trabecular bone of the proximal femur using multislice computed tomography:: A comparison with dual x-ray absorptiometry for predicting biomechanical strength in vitro [J].
Bauer, JS ;
Kohlmann, S ;
Eckstein, F ;
Mueller, D ;
Lochmüller, EM ;
Link, T .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 78 (02) :78-89
[4]   The robustness of phase mapping as a non-Gaussianity test [J].
Chiang, LY ;
Naselsky, PD ;
Coles, P .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 602 (01) :L1-L4
[5]   A comparison of two methods for measuring the signal to noise ratio on MR images [J].
Firbank, MJ ;
Coulthard, A ;
Harrison, RM ;
Williams, ED .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1999, 44 (12) :N261-N264
[6]   Vertebral bone mineral density, marrow perfusion, and fat content in healthy men and men with osteoporosis: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and spectroscopy [J].
Griffith, JF ;
Yeung, DKW ;
Antonio, GE ;
Lee, FKH ;
Hong, AWL ;
Wong, SYS ;
Lau, EMC ;
Leung, PC .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 236 (03) :945-951
[7]   THE RICIAN DISTRIBUTION OF NOISY MRI DATA [J].
GUDBJARTSSON, H ;
PATZ, S .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1995, 34 (06) :910-914
[8]   Prostate cancer evaluated with ferumoxtran-10-enhanced T2*-weighted MR imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T:: Early experience [J].
Heesakkers, RAM ;
Fütterer, JJ ;
Hövels, AM ;
van den Bosch, HCM ;
Scheenen, TWJ ;
Hoogeveen, YL ;
Barentsz, JO .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 239 (02) :481-487
[9]   A new method for the model-independent assessment of thickness in three-dimensional images [J].
Hildebrand, T ;
Ruegsegger, P .
JOURNAL OF MICROSCOPY-OXFORD, 1997, 185 :67-75
[10]   Local differences in the trabecular bone structure of the proximal femur depicted with high-spatial-resolution MR imaging and multisection CT [J].
Issever, AS ;
Vieth, V ;
Lotter, A ;
Meier, N ;
Laib, A ;
Newitt, D ;
Majumdar, S ;
Link, TM .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2002, 9 (12) :1395-1406