Cost-utility of a walking programme for moderately depressed, obese, or overweight elderly women in primary care: a randomised controlled trial

被引:88
作者
Gusi, Narcis [1 ]
Reyes, Maria C. [1 ]
Gonzalez-Guerrero, Jose L. [2 ]
Herrera, Emilio [3 ]
Garcia, Jose M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Extremadura, Fac Sports Sci, Caceres, Spain
[2] Hosp Caceres, Geriatr Unite, Caceres, Spain
[3] Hlth Syst Extremadura, Junta De Extremadura, Merida, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2458-8-231
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: There is a considerable public health burden due to physical inactivity, because it is a major independent risk factor for several diseases (e. g., type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, moderate mood disorders neurotic diseases such as depression, etc.). This study assesses the cost utility of the adding a supervised walking programme to the standard "best primary care" for overweight, moderately obese, or moderately depressed elderly women. Methods: One-hundred six participants were randomly assigned to an interventional group (n = 55) or a control group (n = 51). The intervention consisted of an invitation, from a general practitioner, to participate in a 6-month walking-based, supervised exercise program with three 50-minute sessions per week. The main outcome measures were the healthcare costs from the Health System perspective and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) using EuroQol (EQ-5D.) Results: Of the patients invited to participate in the program, 79% were successfully recruited, and 86% of the participants in the exercise group completed the programme. Over 6 months, the mean treatment cost per patient in the exercise group was (sic) 41 more than " best care". The mean incremental QALY of intervention was 0.132 (95% CI: 0.104-0.286). Each extra QALY gained by the exercise programme relative to best care cost (sic) 311 (95% CI, (sic) 143-(sic) 394). The cost effectiveness acceptability curves showed a 90% probability that the addition of the walking programme is the best strategy if the ceiling of inversion is (sic) 350/QALY. Conclusion: The invitation strategy and exercise programme resulted in a high rate of participation and is a feasible and cost-effective addition to best care. The programme is a cost-effective resource for helping patients to increase their physical activity, according to the recommendations of general practitioners. Moreover, the present study could help decision makers enhance the preventive role of primary care and optimize health care resources. Trial Registration: [ISRCTN98931797]
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   The burden of physical activity-related ill health in the UK [J].
Allender, Steven ;
Foster, Charlie ;
Scarborough, Peter ;
Rayner, Mike .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2007, 61 (04) :344-348
[2]  
[Anonymous], STATE TRAIT ANXIETY
[3]  
Badia X, 1999, MED CLIN-BARCELONA, V112, P79
[4]   Epidemiological evidence for the role of physical activity in reducing risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease [J].
Bassuk, SS ;
Manson, JE .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 99 (03) :1193-1204
[5]   Recruiting patients to randomized trials in primary care: principles and case study [J].
Bell-Syer, SEM ;
Moffett, JAK .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2000, 17 (02) :187-191
[6]   A telephone-only motivational intervention to increase physical activity in rural adults - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Bennett, Jill A. ;
Young, Heather M. ;
Nail, Lillian M. ;
Winters-Stone, Kerri ;
Hanson, Ginger .
NURSING RESEARCH, 2008, 57 (01) :24-32
[7]   Regular use of pedometer does not enhance beneficial outcomes in a physical activity intervention study in type 2 diabetes mellitus [J].
Bjorgaas, Marit R. ;
Vik, John T. ;
Stolen, Tomas ;
Lydersen, Stian ;
Grill, Valdemar .
METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2008, 57 (05) :605-611
[8]   Factors associated with non-participation in a physical activity promotion trial [J].
Chinn, DJ ;
White, M ;
Howel, D ;
Harland, JOE ;
Drinkwater, CK .
PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 120 (04) :309-319
[9]   Differential recruitment in a cluster randomized trial in primary care: the experience of the UK back pain, exercise, active management and manipulation (UK BEAM) feasibility study [J].
Farrin, A ;
Russell, I ;
Torgerson, D ;
Underwood, M .
CLINICAL TRIALS, 2005, 2 (02) :119-124
[10]   A guide to cost-effectiveness acceptability curves [J].
Fenwick, E ;
Byford, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 187 :106-108