Unipolar radiofrequency treatment to improve the appearance of cellulite

被引:37
作者
Alexiades-Armenakas, Macrene [1 ]
Dover, Jeffrey S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Arndt, Kenneth A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
[2] Dartmouth Coll, Hitchcock Med Ctr, Dartmouth Med Sch, Hanover, NH 03756 USA
[3] SkinCare Phys, Chestnut Hill, MA USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Body sculpting; cellulite; lasers; laxity; radiofrequency; skin tightening; unipolar; wrinkle reduction;
D O I
10.1080/14764170802279651
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background: Previous studies suggest that radiofrequency (RF) energy may be effective as a treatment for cellulite. Objective: This bilateral paired blinded comparative study assesses the efficacy and safety of a unipolar RF device for improving the appearance of cellulite using a new quantitative cellulite grading system. Methods: In this randomized, blinded, split-design study, 10 individuals (aged 32-57 years) with a clinically observable excess of subcutaneous fat and cellulite (minimum grade 2 out of 4) on the thighs received up to six unilateral treatments (number of treatments at the investigator's discretion) at 2-week intervals with unipolar RF. The untreated side of the thigh served as an internal control. Treated thighs were randomly assigned by alternate allocation. Results were evaluated using study participant questionnaires and by two blinded evaluators (JSD, KAA) using photographs and the author's (MAA) cellulite grading scale at each treatment visit and at 1month and 3-month follow-up visits after the final treatment. A novel quantitative four-point cellulite grading system is presented and applied, which separately grades dimple density, dimple distribution, dimple depth, diameter and contour. Results: All participants responded to treatment (mean of 4.22 and range of three to six treatments). The blinded evaluations of photographs using the cellulite grading scale demonstrated the following mean grading scores for the treated leg versus the control leg: dimple density of 2.73 vs 3.18 (11.25% mean improvement), dimple distribution 2.89 vs 3.32 (10.75% mean improvement), dimple depth 1.47 vs 1.54 (2.5% mean improvement), and mean score of 2.36 (SEM 0.45) vs 2.68 (SEM 0.57) (8.00 +/- 2.84% mean improvement). The treatment was painless and side effects included minimal to moderate erythema which resolved within 1 to 3 hours. No crusting, scarring or dyspigmentation was observed. Conclusions: This randomized, blinded, split-design, controlled study employing a quantitative four-point grading scale demonstrated that this unipolar RF device is safe for the treatment of cellulite. Clinically visible and quantified improvement which did not achieve statistical significance but showed a trend toward improvement was observed in all patients following a mean of four treatments at 2-week intervals.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 153
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Alexiades-Armenakas M., 2006, J DRUGS DERMATOL, V5, P609
  • [2] Alster Tina S, 2005, J Cosmet Laser Ther, V7, P81, DOI 10.1080/14764170500190242
  • [3] DELPINO E, 2006, J DRUGS DERMATOL, V5, P714
  • [4] Fisher GH, 2005, DERMATOL SURG, V31, P1237
  • [5] Multicenter study of noninvasive radiofrequency for periorbital tissue tightening
    Fitzpatrick, R
    Geronemus, R
    Goldberg, D
    Kaminer, M
    Kilmer, S
    Ruiz-Esparza, J
    [J]. LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, 2003, 33 (04) : 232 - 242
  • [6] Clinical, laboratory, and MRI analysis of cellulite treatment with a unipolar radiofrequency device
    Goldberg, David J.
    Fazeli, Amin
    Berlin, Alexander L.
    [J]. DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2008, 34 (02) : 204 - 209
  • [7] The use of nonablative radiofrequency technology to tighten the lower face and neck
    Hsu, TS
    Kaminer, MS
    [J]. SEMINARS IN CUTANEOUS MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2003, 22 (02) : 115 - 123
  • [8] A single center, randomized, comparative, prospective clinical study to determine the efficacy of the VelaSmooth system versus the TriActive system for the treatment of cellulite
    Nootheti, Pavan K.
    Magpantay, Angela
    Yosowitz, Gail
    Calderon, Steve
    Goldman, Mitchel P.
    [J]. LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, 2006, 38 (10) : 908 - 912
  • [9] Why does carbon dioxide resurfacing work? A Review
    Ross, EV
    McKinlay, JR
    Anderson, RR
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1999, 135 (04) : 444 - 454
  • [10] Sadick Neil, 2007, J Cosmet Laser Ther, V9, P15, DOI 10.1080/14764170601134461