Impact of Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Types on Environmental Investment Decision-Making

被引:18
作者
Jassem, Suaad [1 ]
Azmi, Anna [1 ]
Zakaria, Zarina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Fac Business & Accountancy, Dept Accounting, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
关键词
sustainability balanced scorecard; experimental method; environmental investment decision-making; eco-efficiency knowledge; sustainability balanced scorecard knowledge; ECO-EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS; ACCOUNTING INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; PERSPECTIVE; FRAMEWORK; GREEN; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/su10020541
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Investment decision-making based on aspects of sustainability is gaining importance among organizations around the globe. In this context, there is a need for quality investment decisions, which require sufficient knowledge among organizational managers about managing sustainability information to achieve environmental objectives that meet stakeholder expectations. This has led to the emergence of organizational performance measuring tools such as the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard, which integrates the environmental perspective into the traditional Balanced Scorecard. Using experimental research method, the objective of this study is to investigate the indirect effect of Eco-efficiency knowledge and Sustainability Balanced Scorecard knowledge as mediators influencing the relationship between Sustainability Balanced Scorecard types and their impact on environmental investment decision-making. Findings of the current research are based on 60 respondents who were randomly assigned to one of the following two types of Sustainability Balanced Scorecard architecture: (1) environmental data embedded within the traditional Balanced Scorecard perspectives; and (2) standalone environmental data as an additional fifth perspective along with the traditional Balanced Scorecard architecture. The traditional Balanced Scorecard without any information on environmental perspective is included in the experiment as the control condition. The findings indicate that the combined effect of eco-efficiency knowledge and Sustainability Balanced Scorecard knowledge has a significant positive influence on the relationship between the Balanced Scorecard type versus Sustainability Balanced Scorecard type and environmental investment decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Incorporating linear programing and life cycle thinking into environmental sustainability decision-making: a case study on anchovy canning industry
    Garcia-Herrero, I.
    Laso, J.
    Margallo, M.
    Bala, A.
    Gazulla, C.
    Fullana-i-Palmer, P.
    Vazquez-Rowe, I.
    Irabien, A.
    Aldaco, R.
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2017, 19 (07) : 1897 - 1912
  • [42] DETERMINANTS OF SHORT-TERM INVESTMENT DECISION-MAKING
    Akhtar, Muhammad Naeem
    Rehman, Kashif Ur
    Hunjra, Ahmed Imran
    ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ECONOMICS, 2011, (125): : 356 - 363
  • [43] Combining corporate environmental sustainability and customer experience management to build an integrated model for decision-making
    Calza, Francesco
    Sorrentino, Annarita
    Tutore, Ilaria
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2023, 61 (13) : 54 - 84
  • [44] Using the IUCN Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa to inform decision-making
    Kumschick, Sabrina
    Bertolino, Sandro
    Blackburn, Tim M.
    Brundu, Giuseppe
    Costello, Katie E.
    de Groot, Maarten
    Evans, Thomas
    Gallardo, Belinda
    Genovesi, Piero
    Govender, Tanushri
    Jeschke, Jonathan M.
    Lapin, Katharina
    Measey, John
    Novoa, Ana
    Nunes, Ana L.
    Probert, Anna F.
    Pysek, Petr
    Preda, Cristina
    Rabitsch, Wolfgang
    Roy, Helen E.
    Smith, Kevin G.
    Tricarico, Elena
    Vila, Montserrat
    Vimercati, Giovanni
    Bacher, Sven
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2024, 38 (02)
  • [45] Embedding environment and sustainability into corporate financial decision-making
    Siegrist, Manuel
    Bowman, Gary
    Mervine, Evelyn
    Southam, Colette
    ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2020, 60 (01) : 129 - 147
  • [46] Investment decision-making model and application of mining equipment
    Zhang, Zhaogang
    Liu, Chaohong
    Zhao, Yanhua
    FRONTIERS OF MANUFACTURING AND DESIGN SCIENCE III, PTS 1 AND 2, 2013, 271-272 : 1776 - +
  • [47] Environmental impact assessment based on group decision-making methods in mining projects
    Rikhtegar, Navid
    Mansouri, Nabiollah
    Oroumieh, Amir Ahadi
    Yazdani-Chamzini, Abdolreza
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Kildiene, Simona
    ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2014, 27 (01): : 378 - 392
  • [48] A formal framework for scenario development in support of environmental decision-making
    Mahmoud, Mohammed
    Liu, Yuqiong
    Hartmann, Holly
    Stewart, Steven
    Wagener, Thorsten
    Semmens, Darius
    Stewart, Robert
    Gupta, Hoshin
    Dominguez, Damian
    Dominguez, Francina
    Hulse, David
    Letcher, Rebecca
    Rashleigh, Brenda
    Smith, Court
    Street, Roger
    Ticehurst, Jenifer
    Twery, Mark
    van Delden, Hedwig
    Waldick, Ruth
    White, Denis
    Winter, Larry
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2009, 24 (07) : 798 - 808
  • [49] SUSTAINABILITY IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
    da Silva, Rafael Felix
    REVISTA METROPOLITANA DE SUSTENTABILIDADE, 2021, 11 (03): : 215 - 236
  • [50] Dissecting the impact of depression on decision-making
    Lawlor, Victoria M.
    Webb, Christian A.
    Wiecki, Thomas, V
    Frank, Michael J.
    Trivedi, Madhukar
    Pizzagalli, Diego A.
    Dillon, Daniel G.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 50 (10) : 1613 - 1622