Impact of Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Types on Environmental Investment Decision-Making

被引:18
作者
Jassem, Suaad [1 ]
Azmi, Anna [1 ]
Zakaria, Zarina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Fac Business & Accountancy, Dept Accounting, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
关键词
sustainability balanced scorecard; experimental method; environmental investment decision-making; eco-efficiency knowledge; sustainability balanced scorecard knowledge; ECO-EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS; ACCOUNTING INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; PERSPECTIVE; FRAMEWORK; GREEN; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/su10020541
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Investment decision-making based on aspects of sustainability is gaining importance among organizations around the globe. In this context, there is a need for quality investment decisions, which require sufficient knowledge among organizational managers about managing sustainability information to achieve environmental objectives that meet stakeholder expectations. This has led to the emergence of organizational performance measuring tools such as the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard, which integrates the environmental perspective into the traditional Balanced Scorecard. Using experimental research method, the objective of this study is to investigate the indirect effect of Eco-efficiency knowledge and Sustainability Balanced Scorecard knowledge as mediators influencing the relationship between Sustainability Balanced Scorecard types and their impact on environmental investment decision-making. Findings of the current research are based on 60 respondents who were randomly assigned to one of the following two types of Sustainability Balanced Scorecard architecture: (1) environmental data embedded within the traditional Balanced Scorecard perspectives; and (2) standalone environmental data as an additional fifth perspective along with the traditional Balanced Scorecard architecture. The traditional Balanced Scorecard without any information on environmental perspective is included in the experiment as the control condition. The findings indicate that the combined effect of eco-efficiency knowledge and Sustainability Balanced Scorecard knowledge has a significant positive influence on the relationship between the Balanced Scorecard type versus Sustainability Balanced Scorecard type and environmental investment decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Managing trade-offs in complex scenarios: A decision-making tool for sustainability projects
    de Magalhaes, Ruane Fernandes
    Ferreira Danilevicz, Angela de Moura
    Palazzo, Joseph
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 212 : 447 - 460
  • [32] Architectural Design: Sustainability in the Decision-Making Process
    Feria, Margarida
    Amado, Miguel
    BUILDINGS, 2019, 9 (05)
  • [33] Navigating Sustainability Embeddedness in Management Decision-Making
    Le Roux, Catherine
    Pretorius, Marius
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (05)
  • [34] Patients' Attitudes Towards Integrating Environmental Sustainability Into Healthcare Decision-Making: An Interview Study
    Cohen, Eva S.
    Kringos, Dionne S.
    Grandiek, Fleur
    Kouwenberg, Lisanne H. J. A.
    Weiland, Nicolaas H. Sperna
    Richie, Cristina
    Hehenkamp, Wouter J. K.
    Aarts, Johanna W. M.
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2025, 28 (01)
  • [35] Probing the impact of recognition-based heuristic biases on investment decision-making and performance
    Ahmad, Maqsood
    Wu, Qiang
    Abbass, Yasar
    KYBERNETES, 2023, 52 (10) : 4229 - 4256
  • [36] Demand-dependent recovery decision-making of a batch of products for sustainability
    Meng, Kai
    Cao, Ying
    Peng, Xianghui
    Prybutok, Victor
    Gupta, Varun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2020, 224
  • [37] Integrating sustainability into strategic decision-making: A fuzzy AHP method for the selection of relevant sustainability issues
    Calabrese, Armando
    Costa, Roberta
    Levialdi, Nathan
    Menichini, Tamara
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 139 : 155 - 168
  • [38] Impact of Industry 4.0 on decision-making in an operational context
    Rosin, F.
    Forget, P.
    Lamouri, S.
    Pellerin, R.
    ADVANCES IN PRODUCTION ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 16 (04): : 500 - 514
  • [39] Incorporating uncertainty and risk in transportation investment decision-making
    Mishra, Sabyasachee
    Khasnabis, Snehamay
    Swain, Subrat
    TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 38 (07) : 738 - 760
  • [40] An Extended Pythagorean Fuzzy Approach to Group Decision-Making With Incomplete Preferences for Analyzing Balanced Scorecard-Based Renewable Energy Investments
    Xie, Yizhang
    Zhou, Ye
    Peng, Yue
    Dincer, Hasan
    Yuksel, Serhat
    Xiang, Ping An
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 43020 - 43035