Local deficits and local jobs: Can US states stabilize their own economies?

被引:11
作者
Carlino, Gerald A. [1 ]
Inman, Robert P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Fed Reserve Bank Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
PANEL-DATA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmoneco.2013.04.015
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Using a sample of the 48 mainland US states for the period 1973-2009, we study the ability of US states to expand their own state employment through the use of state deficit policies. The analysis allows for the facts that US states are part of a wider monetary and economic union with free factor mobility across all states and that state residents and firms may purchase goods from "neighboring" states. Those purchases may generate economic spillovers across neighbors. Estimates suggest that states can increase their own state employment by increasing their own deficits. There is evidence of spillovers to employment in neighboring states defined by common cyclical patterns among state economies. For large states, aggregate spillovers to its economic neighbors are approximately two-thirds of the large state's job growth. Because of significant spillovers and possible incentives to free-ride, there is a potential case to actively coordinate (i.e., centralize) the management of stabilization policies. Finally, the job effects of a temporary increase in state own deficits persist for at most one to two years, and there is evidence of a negative impact on state jobs when these deficits are scheduled for repayment. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 530
页数:14
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Working Paper No. 125
[2]   SOME TESTS OF SPECIFICATION FOR PANEL DATA - MONTE-CARLO EVIDENCE AND AN APPLICATION TO EMPLOYMENT EQUATIONS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOND, S .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1991, 58 (02) :277-297
[3]  
Auerbach A, 2012, 18578 NBER
[4]   The Effects of Government Purchases Shocks: Review and Estimates for the EU [J].
Beetsma, Roel ;
Giuliodori, Massimo .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2011, 121 (550) :F4-F32
[5]   On testing overidentifying restrictions in dynamic panel data models [J].
Bowsher, CG .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2002, 77 (02) :211-220
[6]   THE GEOGRAPHIC-DISTRIBUTION OF UNEMPLOYMENT RATES IN THE UNITED-STATES - A SPATIAL TIME-SERIES ANALYSIS [J].
BRONARS, SG ;
JANSEN, DW .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1987, 36 (03) :251-279
[7]  
Caselli Francesco., 1996, J ECON GROWTH, V1, P363, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF00141044, 10.1007/BF00141044]
[8]   FEDERAL-AID AND PUBLIC-EDUCATION - AN EMPIRICAL LOOK AT THE NEW FISCAL FEDERALISM [J].
CRAIG, SG ;
INMAN, RP .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1982, 64 (04) :541-552
[9]   An alternative definition of economic regions in the United States based on similarities in state business cycles [J].
Crone, TM .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2005, 87 (04) :617-626
[10]   The Limited Influence of Unemployment on the Wage Bargain [J].
Hall, Robert E. ;
Milgrom, Paul R. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (04) :1653-1674