Estimating the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement Measure

被引:19
作者
Hsieh, Yu-Wei [1 ]
Wang, Chun-Hou [2 ,3 ]
Sheu, Ching-Fan [4 ]
Hsueh, I-Ping [1 ]
Hsieh, Ching-Lin [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Sch Occupat Therapy, Taipei 100, Taiwan
[2] Chung Shan Med Univ, Sch Phys Therapy, Taichung, Taiwan
[3] Chung Shan Med Univ, Rehabil Hosp, Dept Phys Therapy, Taichung, Taiwan
[4] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Inst Cognit Sci, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
关键词
Minimal clinically important difference; Motor function; Mobility; Stroke;
D O I
10.1177/1545968308316385
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM) measure is unknown, which limits the application and interpretation of change scores. Objective. To estimate the MCID of the 3 subscales (ie, lower extremity, upper extremity, and mobility subscales) of the STREAM using the method of patients' global ratings of change. Methods. Eighty-one stroke patients participated in this study. The patients' global ratings of change were used to rate their changes of limb movements and basic mobility skills on the 15-point Likert scale. The mean change scores on the 3 subscales of STREAM of the MCID group (ie, scored on + 2 to + 3 or -2 to -3) served as the estimates of the MCID. Results. There were 42, 38, and 43 patients in the MCID group, and the estimates of the MCID were 2.2, 1.9, and 4.8 points for the upper-extremity subscale, lower-extremity subscale, and mobility subscale, respectively. Conclusions. These findings suggest that if the mean change scores on the 3 subscales of the STREAM within a stroke group have reached 2.2, 1.9, and 4.8 points, the change scores on the 3 subscales of the STREAM can be perceived by patients as clinically important.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 727
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   The Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM):: A comparison with other measures used to evaluate effects of stroke and rehabilitation [J].
Ahmed, S ;
Mayo, NE ;
Higgins, J ;
Salbach, NM ;
Finch, L ;
Wood-Dauphinée, SL .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2003, 83 (07) :617-630
[2]   Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Boers, M ;
Wells, GA .
CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2002, 14 (02) :109-114
[3]   Evaluating changes in health status: Reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders [J].
Beaton, DE ;
HoggJohnson, S ;
Bombardier, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (01) :79-93
[4]   Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods [J].
Copay, Anne G. ;
Subach, Brian R. ;
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Polly, David W., Jr. ;
Schuler, Thomas C. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2007, 7 (05) :541-546
[5]   Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life [J].
Crosby, RD ;
Kolotkin, RL ;
Williams, GR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (05) :395-407
[6]   Reliability of scores on the stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement (STREAM) measure [J].
Daley, K ;
Mayo, N ;
Wood-Dauphinée, S .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1999, 79 (01) :8-23
[7]  
Daley K, 1997, PHYSIOTHER CAN, V49, P269
[8]  
FOLSTEIN MF, 1975, J PSYCHIATR RES, V12, P198
[9]   The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of motor recovery after stroke: A critical review of its measurement properties [J].
Gladstone, DJ ;
Danells, CJ ;
Black, SE .
NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2002, 16 (03) :232-240
[10]   FOLSTEIN VS MODIFIED MINI-MENTAL-STATE-EXAMINATION IN GERIATRIC STROKE - STABILITY, VALIDITY, AND SCREENING UTILITY [J].
GRACE, J ;
NADLER, JD ;
WHITE, DA ;
GUILMETTE, TJ ;
GIULIANO, AJ ;
MONSCH, AU ;
SNOW, MG .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1995, 52 (05) :477-484