Passive Sensing in the Prediction of Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors: Protocol for a Systematic Review

被引:2
作者
Winkler, Tanita [1 ]
Buescher, Rebekka [2 ]
Larsen, Mark Erik [3 ]
Kwon, Sam [4 ]
Torous, John [4 ]
Firth, Joseph [5 ]
Sander, Lasse B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Inst Psychol, Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Freiburg, Med Psychol & Med Sociol, Fac Med, Freiburg, Germany
[3] Univ New South Wales, Black Dog Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[5] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Psychol & Mental Hlth, Manchester, Lancs, England
来源
JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS | 2022年 / 11卷 / 11期
关键词
suicide prediction; passive sensing; review; systematic review; sensors; suicidal thoughts and behaviors; digital markers; behavioral markers; RISK-FACTORS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.2196/42146
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Suicide is a severe public health problem, resulting in a high number of attempts and deaths each year. Early detection of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) is key to preventing attempts. We discuss passive sensing of digital and behavioral markers to enhance the detection and prediction of STBs. Objective: The paper presents the protocol for a systematic review that aims to summarize existing research on passive sensing of STBs and evaluate whether the STB prediction can be improved using passive sensing compared to prior prediction models. Methods: A systematic search will be conducted in the scientific databases MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Eligible studies need to investigate any passive sensor data from smartphones or wearables to predict STBs. The predictive value of passive sensing will be the primary outcome. The practical implications and feasibility of the studies will be considered as secondary outcomes. Study quality will be assessed using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). If studies are sufficiently homogenous, we will conduct a meta-analysis of the predictive value of passive sensing on STBs. Results: The review process started in July 2022 with data extraction in September 2022. Results are expected in December 2022. Conclusions: Despite intensive research efforts, the ability to predict STBs is little better than chance. This systematic review will contribute to our understanding of the potential of passive sensing to improve STB prediction. Future research will be stimulated since gaps in the current literature will be identified and promising next steps toward clinical implementation will be outlined.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Sensing Technologies for Monitoring Serious Mental Illnesses
    Abdullah, Saeed
    Choudhury, Tanzeem
    [J]. IEEE MULTIMEDIA, 2018, 25 (01) : 61 - 75
  • [2] Short-term prediction of suicidal thoughts and behaviors in adolescents: Can recent developments in technology and computational science provide a breakthrough?
    Allen, Nicholas B.
    Nelson, Benjamin W.
    Brent, David
    Auerbach, Randy P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2019, 250 : 163 - 169
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2021, Suicide
  • [4] Perceived Utility and Characterization of Personal Google Search Histories to Detect Data Patterns Proximal to a Suicide Attempt in Individuals Who Previously Attempted Suicide: Pilot Cohort Study
    Arean, Patricia A.
    Pratap, Abhishek
    Hsin, Honor
    Huppert, Tierney K.
    Hendricks, Karin E.
    Heagerty, Patrick J.
    Cohen, Trevor
    Bagge, Courtney
    Comtois, Katherine Anne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (05)
  • [5] New Methods for Assessing Rapid Changes in Suicide Risk
    Ballard, Elizabeth D.
    Gilbert, Jessica R.
    Wusinich, Christina
    Zarate, Carlos A., Jr.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 12
  • [6] Baumeister H, 2019, STUD NEUROSCI, pXIII
  • [7] Prediction Models for Suicide Attempts and Deaths: A Systematic Review and Simulation
    Belsher, Bradley E.
    Smolenski, Derek J.
    Pruitt, Larry D.
    Bush, Nigel E.
    Beech, Erin H.
    Workman, Don E.
    Morgan, Rebecca L.
    Evatt, Daniel P.
    Tucker, Jennifer
    Skopp, Nancy A.
    [J]. JAMA PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 76 (06) : 642 - 651
  • [8] Artificial Intelligence and Suicide Prevention: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Investigations
    Bernert, Rebecca A.
    Hilberg, Amanda M.
    Melia, Ruth
    Kim, Jane Paik
    Shah, Nigam H.
    Abnousi, Freddy
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (16) : 1 - 25
  • [9] Combining mobile-health (mHealth) and artificial intelligence (AI) methods to avoid suicide attempts: the Smartcrises study protocol
    Berrouiguet, Sofian
    Barrigon, Maria Luisa
    Castroman, Jorge Lopez
    Courtet, Philippe
    Ages-Rodriguez, Antonio
    Baca-Garcia, Enrique
    [J]. BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [10] Mobile App for Mental Health Monitoring and Clinical Outreach in Veterans: Mixed Methods Feasibility and Acceptability Study
    Betthauser, Lisa M.
    Stearns-Yoder, Kelly A.
    McGarity, Suzanne
    Smith, Victoria
    Place, Skyler
    Brenner, Lisa A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (08)