The 34th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture The abstract representations in speech processing

被引:30
作者
Cutler, Anne [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, NL-6500 AH Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Western Sydney, MARCS Auditory Labs, Penrith, NSW 1797, Australia
关键词
Speech processing; Phonemes; Lexicon; Representations;
D O I
10.1080/13803390802218542
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Speech processing by human listeners derives meaning from acoustic input via intermediate steps involving abstract representations of what has been heard. Recent results from several lines of research are here brought together to shed light on the nature and role of these representations. In spoken-word recognition, representations of phonological form and of conceptual content are dissociable. This follows from the independence of patterns of priming for a word's form and its meaning. The nature of the phonological-form representations is determined not only by acoustic-phonetic input but also by other sources of information, including metalinguistic knowledge. This follows from evidence that listeners can store two forms as different without showing any evidence of being able to detect the difference in question when they listen to speech. The lexical representations are in turn separate from prelexical representations, which are also abstract in nature. This follows from evidence that perceptual learning about speaker-specific phoneme realization, induced on the basis of a few words, generalizes across the whole lexicon to inform the recognition of all words containing the same phoneme. The efficiency of human speech processing has its basis in the rapid execution of operations over, abstract representations.
引用
收藏
页码:1601 / 1619
页数:19
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Semantic combinations in primate calls [J].
Arnold, K ;
Zuberbühler, K .
NATURE, 2006, 441 (7091) :303-303
[2]   Visual recalibration of auditory speech identification: A McGurk aftereffect [J].
Bertelson, P ;
Vroomen, J ;
de Gelder, B .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2003, 14 (06) :592-597
[3]  
Best C. T., 1995, SPEECH PERCEPTION LI, P167
[4]   Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: Evidence from native and non-native listeners [J].
Cooper, N ;
Cutler, A ;
Wales, R .
LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 2002, 45 :207-228
[5]   Effects of phoneme repertoire on phoneme decision [J].
Costa, A ;
Cutler, A ;
Sebastian-Galles, N .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1998, 60 (06) :1022-1031
[6]   Asymmetric mapping from phonetic to lexical representations in second-language listening [J].
Cutler, A ;
Weber, A ;
Otake, T .
JOURNAL OF PHONETICS, 2006, 34 (02) :269-284
[7]   Patterns of English phoneme confusions by native and non-native listeners [J].
Cutler, A ;
Weber, A ;
Smits, R ;
Cooper, N .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2004, 116 (06) :3668-3678
[8]  
Cutler A., 2008, P INT 2008 BRISB AUS
[9]  
CUTLER A, PAPERS LAB PHONOLOGY, V10
[10]   EFFECTS OF FREQUENCY AND VOCABULARY TYPE ON PHONOLOGICAL SPEECH ERRORS [J].
DELL, GS .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 1990, 5 (04) :313-349