Interdisciplinary organization as a basic academic unit?

被引:16
作者
Yang, Liu [1 ,2 ]
Albats, Ekaterina [2 ,3 ]
Etzkowitz, Henry [4 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[2] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] LUT Univ, Lappeenranta, Finland
[4] Int Triple Helix Inst, Palo Alto, CA USA
关键词
Academic departmental impact; interdisciplinarity; interdisciplinary organization; societal impact of universities; university IDOs; INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS; OPEN INNOVATION; INDUSTRY; PARADOX; BERKELEY; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1177/0950422220956951
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Academic interdisciplinarity has become a powerful means of addressing challenges facing contemporary society as well as offering opportunities to advance knowledge. To better understand the role of university interdisciplinary organizations (IDOs), the authors studied 18 IDOs at Stanford University in the USA. They propose that IDOs not only enhance researchers' interdisciplinary collaboration but, counterintuitively, also serve departmental and disciplinary interests. While IDOs are traditionally believed to threaten traditional disciplinary departments, the authors find a "more the more" dynamic in which, by bringing shared university resources and faculty to bear on new themes, significant new resources are generated to the benefit of both actors. Traditionally, the relationship between departments and IDOs has been seen as a zero-sum game with winners and losers. This research suggests, to the contrary, a win-win dynamic in which the two formats are mediated by the research group. Some faculty members are alternately departmental chairs and IDO organizers as well as start-up founders, industrial consultants and holders of high governmental advisory positions during their careers, integrating Triple Helix university-industry-government interactions with IDOs and IDOs with departments. The authors examine how these two entities coexist and benefit one another in a cooperative academic ecosystem and consider the implications for the future of the university.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 187
页数:15
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
ABIRAM PG, 1987, HIST SCI, V25, P1
[2]   Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation [J].
Andriopoulos, Constantine ;
Lewis, Marianne W. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) :696-717
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, PUMP IND ANAL, V9, P4
[4]   Interdisciplinary Centers in Latin American Universities: The Challenges of Institutionalization [J].
Baptista, Bianca Vienni ;
Vasen, Federico ;
Villa Soto, Juan Carlos .
HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY, 2019, 32 (03) :461-483
[5]   SOCIAL FACTORS IN ORIGINS OF A NEW SCIENCE - CASE OF PSYCHOLOGY [J].
BENDAVID, J ;
COLLINS, R .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1966, 31 (04) :451-465
[6]   Superstars in the making? The broad effects of interdisciplinary centers [J].
Biancani, Susan ;
Dahlander, Linus ;
McFarland, Daniel A. ;
Smith, Sanne .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2018, 47 (03) :543-557
[7]  
Bozeman B., 2003, Managing the New Multipurpose, Multidiscipline University Research Center: Institutional Innovation in the Academic Community
[8]   Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success [J].
Bromham, Lindell ;
Dinnage, Russell ;
Hua, Xia .
NATURE, 2016, 534 (7609) :684-+
[9]  
Bryman A., 2015, Business research methods, V4th ed.
[10]   A Fad or a Phenomenon? The Adoption of Open Innovation Practices in Large Firms [J].
Chesbrough, Henry ;
Brunswicker, Sabine .
RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2014, 57 (02) :16-25