The VDR gene FokI polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk

被引:15
作者
Xu, Hui [1 ]
Li, Su [1 ]
Qiu, Jian-Qing [1 ]
Gao, Xiao-Lin [1 ]
Zhang, Ping [1 ]
Yang, Yong-Xia [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Hosp 2, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Jinan 250033, Peoples R China
关键词
Ovarian cancer; Vitamin D receptor; FokI; Polymorphism; Meta-analysis; VITAMIN-D-RECEPTOR; EPIDEMIOLOGY; SUSCEPTIBILITY; METAANALYSIS; PREVENTION; DISEASE; BREAST;
D O I
10.1007/s13277-013-0826-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The polymorphism of vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene is demonstrated to affect the activity of its encoding protein and the subsequent downstream effects mediated by vitamin D. Mutations in VDR gene FokI have been suggested in the development of various cancers. Whether the polymorphism of the VDR gene FokI confers risk to ovarian cancer still remains controversial across the published studies in different ethnicity. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the role of VDR gene FokI variant in the susceptibility to ovarian cancer. Six publications with 14 individual case-control studies involving a total of 10,964 subjects were finally included into our study after a comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Wanfang databases. The strength of the association between the VDR gene FokI polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk was estimated under the allelic (T vs. C), homozygous (TT vs. CC), additive (CT vs. CC), recessive (TT vs. CC + CT), and dominant (CT + TT vs. CC) gene models. The overall odds ratios (ORs) for the contrast models of T vs. C, TT vs. CC, CT vs. CC, and CT + TT vs. CC indicated that the VDR gene FokI variant was related to an increased risk of ovarian cancer (ORT vs. C = 1.09, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.15, P (OR) = 0.004; ORTT vs. CC = 1.17, 95 % CI 1.04-1.32, P (OR) = 0.011; ORCT vs. CC = 1.10, 95 % CI 1.01-1.20, P (OR) = 0.027; ORCT + TT vs. CC = 1.12, 95 % CI 1.03-1.21, P (OR) = 0.007). The stratified analysis among the Caucasians also identified a significant association between the VDR gene FokI polymorphism and the susceptibility to ovarian cancer. The present meta-analysis with large available published data has revealed that the VDR gene FokI polymorphism confers susceptibility to ovarian cancer, particularly among the Caucasian population.
引用
收藏
页码:3309 / 3316
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Ahonen MH, 2000, INT J CANCER, V86, P40, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(20000401)86:1<40::AID-IJC6>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-E
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, SURGERY, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.SURG.2009.06.030
[4]   Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk: A systematic meta-analysis [J].
Bai, Yong-Heng ;
Lu, Hong ;
Hong, Dan ;
Lin, Cheng-Cheng ;
Yu, Zhen ;
Chen, Bi-Cheng .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 18 (14) :1672-1679
[5]   Role of common genetic variants in ovarian cancer susceptibility and outcome: progress to date from the ovarian cancer association consortium (OCAC) [J].
Bolton, K. L. ;
Ganda, C. ;
Berchuck, A. ;
Pharaoh, P. D. P. ;
Gayther, S. A. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 271 (04) :366-378
[6]   Vitamin D and Human Health: Lessons from Vitamin D Receptor Null Mice [J].
Bouillon, Roger ;
Carmeliet, Geert ;
Verlinden, Lieve ;
van Etten, Evelyne ;
Verstuyf, Annemieke ;
Luderer, Hilary F. ;
Lieben, Liesbet ;
Mathieu, Chantal ;
Demay, Marie .
ENDOCRINE REVIEWS, 2008, 29 (06) :726-776
[7]   Infertility as a Cancer Risk Factor - A Review [J].
Cetin, I. ;
Cozzi, V. ;
Antonazzo, P. .
PLACENTA, 2008, 29 :S169-S177
[8]   Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer [J].
Clendenen, Tess V. ;
Arslan, Alan A. ;
Koenig, Karen L. ;
Enquist, Kerstin ;
Wirgin, Isaac ;
Agren, Asa ;
Lukanova, Annekatrin ;
Sjodin, Hubert ;
Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Anne ;
Shore, Roy E. ;
Hallnians, Goran ;
Toniolo, Paolo ;
Lundin, Eva .
CANCER LETTERS, 2008, 260 (1-2) :209-215
[9]   THE COMPARISON OF PERCENTAGES IN MATCHED SAMPLES [J].
COCHRAN, WG .
BIOMETRIKA, 1950, 37 (3-4) :256-266
[10]   The Epidemiology of Endometrial and Ovarian Cancer [J].
Cramer, Daniel W. .
HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2012, 26 (01) :1-+