The Use of Pedometers for Monitoring Physical Activity in Children and Adolescents: Measurement Considerations

被引:69
作者
Clemes, Stacy A. [1 ]
Biddle, Stuart J. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Loughborough, Sch Sport Exercise & Hlth Sci, Loughborough, Leics, England
关键词
validity and reliability; monitoring frame; reactivity; data treatment and reporting; instrument choice; PRIMARY-SCHOOL CHILDREN; BODY-MASS INDEX; STEP COUNTS; ELECTRONIC PEDOMETERS; ENERGY-COST; HEART-RATE; ACCURACY; VALIDITY; REACTIVITY; ACCELEROMETRY;
D O I
10.1123/jpah.10.2.249
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Pedometers are increasingly being used to measure physical activity in children and adolescents. This review provides an overview of common measurement issues relating to their use. Methods: Studies addressing the following measurement issues in children/adolescents (aged 3-18 years) were included: pedometer validity and reliability, monitoring period, wear time, reactivity, and data treatment and reporting. Pedometer surveillance studies in children/adolescents (aged: 4-18 years) were also included to enable common measurement protocols to be highlighted. Results: In children >5 years, pedometers provide a valid and reliable, objective measure of ambulatory activity. Further evidence is required on pedometer validity in preschool children. Across all ages, optimal monitoring frames to detect habitual activity have yet to be determined; most surveillance studies use 7 days. It is recommended that standardized wear time criteria are established for different age groups, and that wear times are reported. As activity varies between weekdays and weekend days, researchers interested in habitual activity should include both types of day in surveillance studies. There is conflicting evidence on the presence of reactivity to pedometers. Conclusions: Pedometers are a suitable tool to objectively assess ambulatory activity in children (>5 years) and adolescents. This review provides recommendations to enhance the standardization of measurement protocols.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 262
页数:14
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
Al-Hazzaa Hazzaa M., 2007, Journal of Physiological Anthropology, V26, P459, DOI 10.2114/jpa2.26.459
[2]   How many days was that? Intra-individual variability and physical activity assessment [J].
Baranowski, T ;
de Moor, C .
RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2000, 71 (02) :S74-S78
[3]   Accuracy of five electronic pedometers for measuring distance walked [J].
Bassett, DR ;
Ainsworth, BE ;
Leggett, SR ;
Mathien, CA ;
Main, JA ;
Hunter, DC ;
Duncan, GE .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1996, 28 (08) :1071-1077
[4]   The Pursuit of the Reactivity: A Need for a Closer Look [J].
Beets, Michael .
MEASUREMENT IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND EXERCISE SCIENCE, 2006, 10 (04) :265-267
[5]   Student and parent self-reported changes in physical activity behavior while wearing an unsealed pedometer [J].
Beets, Michael W. ;
Eilert, Arissa G. ;
Pitetti, Kenneth H. ;
Foley, John T. .
PEDIATRIC EXERCISE SCIENCE, 2006, 18 (04) :492-499
[6]   The accuracy of pedometer steps and time during walking in children [J].
Beets, MW ;
Patton, MM ;
Edwards, S .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2005, 37 (03) :513-520
[7]   Pedometer step count and BMI of Irish primary school children aged 6-9 years [J].
Belton, Sarahjane ;
Brady, Philip ;
Meegan, Sarah ;
Woods, Catherine .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 50 (04) :189-192
[8]   Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer measures of physical activity in preschool children [J].
Cardon, Greet ;
De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse .
PEDIATRIC EXERCISE SCIENCE, 2007, 19 (02) :205-214
[9]   Pedometer-assessed physical activity of Singaporean youths [J].
Chia, Michael .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 50 (5-6) :262-264
[10]   Reactivity: an issue for short-term pedometer studies? [J].
Clemes, S. A. ;
Matchett, N. ;
Wane, S. L. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2008, 42 (01) :68-70