Multiple-Unit Holdings Yield Attenuated Endowment Effects

被引:20
作者
Burson, Katherine [1 ]
Faro, David [2 ]
Rottenstreich, Yuval [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ross Sch Business, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] London Business Sch, London NW1 4SA, England
[3] NYU, Stern Sch Business, New York, NY 10011 USA
关键词
endowment effect; loss aversion; prospect theory; value function; query theory; LOSS AVERSION; CONSUMER CHOICE; DECISIONS; VICTIMS; LOSSES; SAKE;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.1120.1562
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Previous endowment effect experiments have examined circumstances in which people encounter a single unit of a good (e.g., one chocolate). We contrast single-unit treatments with multiple-unit treatments in which participants encounter several units of a good (e.g., five chocolates). We observe endowment effects of typical magnitude for singleton holdings but attenuated endowment effects for multiple-unit holdings. Moreover, endowment effects consistently arise for singletons even as the definition of a unit is altered. For instance, participants holding one piece of chocolate show an endowment effect of standard size, but so do participants holding one box of chocolates. Yet the box contains about 20 individual pieces of chocolate, and participants given that many separate pieces show a substantially attenuated endowment effect. We thus propose the property of "unit dependence": the definition of a unit can change, but contingent on any given definition, a pronounced endowment effect may emerge for singletons but not multiples.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 555
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   When do losses loom larger than gains? [J].
Ariely, D ;
Huber, J ;
Wertenbroch, K .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2005, 42 (02) :134-138
[2]   MYOPIC LOSS AVERSION AND THE EQUITY PREMIUM PUZZLE [J].
BENARTZI, S ;
THALER, RH .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1995, 110 (01) :73-92
[3]   Option attachment: When deliberating makes choosing feel like losing [J].
Carmon, Z ;
Wertenbroch, K ;
Zeelenberg, M .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2003, 30 (01) :15-29
[4]   THE DISPARITY BETWEEN WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY MEASURES OF VALUE [J].
COURSEY, DL ;
HOVIS, JL ;
SCHULZE, WD .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1987, 102 (03) :679-690
[5]   Inherent rule variability in consumer choice: Changing rules for change's sake [J].
Drolet, A .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2002, 29 (03) :293-305
[6]   When Does Choice Reveal Preference? Moderators of Heuristic versus Goal-Based Choice [J].
Drolet, Aimee ;
Luce, Mary Frances ;
Simonson, Itamar .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2009, 36 (01) :137-147
[7]   The effect of adding a constant to all payoffs: experimental investigation, and implications for reinforcement learning models [J].
Erev, I ;
Bereby-Meyer, Y ;
Roth, AE .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1999, 39 (01) :111-128
[8]   Loss Aversion, Diminishing Sensitivity, and the Effect of Experience on Repeated Decisions [J].
Erev, Ido ;
Ert, Eyal ;
Yechiam, Eldad .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2008, 21 (05) :575-597
[9]   The rejection of attractive gambles, loss aversion, and the lemon avoidance heuristic [J].
Ert, Eyal ;
Erev, Ido .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 29 (05) :715-723
[10]   Loss aversion and seller behavior: Evidence from the housing market [J].
Genesove, D ;
Mayer, C .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2001, 116 (04) :1233-1260