Do foreign investors mitigate anchoring bias in stock market? Evidence based on post-earnings announcement drift

被引:17
作者
Shin, Heejeong [1 ]
Park, Sorah [1 ]
机构
[1] Ewha Womans Univ, Ewha Sch Business, 52 Ewhayeodae Gil, Seoul 03760, South Korea
关键词
Foreign investors; Post-earnings announcement drift; Anchoring bias; 52-week high price; Market inefficiency; INFORMATION UNCERTAINTY; FUTURE EARNINGS; FULLY REFLECT; HOME BIAS; RETURNS; EFFICIENCY; ATTENTION; SOPHISTICATION; UNDERREACTION; MOMENTUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.02.008
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
In this paper, we examine the role of foreign investors in the anchoring bias of stock markets. While the existing behavioral finance literature is mostly based on established capital markets like U.S. and U.K., this paper focuses on emerging economy in which foreign investors are important stockholders. Using a sample of common stocks listed on the Korea Stock Exchange between 2001 and 2014, we document the following empirical results. First, the nearness of current price to the 52-week high is positively related to the magnitude of post-earnings announcement drift (PEAD). This indicates that investors are hesitant to revise their beliefs upward (downward) when positive (negative) surprises arrive if the price is already near (far below) its 52-week high, on average. More important, the positive relation between the price proximity to the 52-week high and PEAD disappears for stocks with high level of foreign investor ownership, suggesting that anchoring effect of stocks' 52-week high prices is mitigated by foreign investors. Also, dedicated foreign institutions play an important role in mitigating the extent of PEAD due to anchoring bias. These findings add new evidence to the literature that sophisticated foreign investors reduce market anomaly because they are less subject to cognitive bias such as anchoring on 52-week high stock price in forming earnings expectations.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 240
页数:17
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Does governance travel around the world? Evidence from institutional investors [J].
Aggarwal, Reena ;
Erel, Isil ;
Ferreira, Miguel ;
Matos, Pedro .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 100 (01) :154-181
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1982, JUDGMENT UNCERTAINTY
[3]   How naive is the stock market's use of earnings information? [J].
Ball, R ;
Bartov, E .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1996, 21 (03) :319-337
[4]   EMPIRICAL EVALUATION OF ACCOUNTING INCOME NUMBERS [J].
BALL, R ;
BROWN, P .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1968, 6 (02) :159-178
[5]   Investor sophistication and patterns in stock returns after earnings announcements [J].
Bartov, E ;
Radhakrishnan, S ;
Krinsky, I .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2000, 75 (01) :43-63
[6]   EVIDENCE THAT STOCK-PRICES DO NOT FULLY REFLECT THE IMPLICATIONS OF CURRENT EARNINGS FOR FUTURE EARNINGS [J].
BERNARD, VL ;
THOMAS, JK .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1990, 13 (04) :305-340
[7]   The timing of 52-week high price and momentum [J].
Bhootra, Ajay ;
Hur, Jungshik .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2013, 37 (10) :3773-3782
[8]   AN INFORMATIONAL EFFICIENCY PERSPECTIVE ON THE POST-EARNINGS ANNOUNCEMENT DRIFT [J].
BHUSHAN, R .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1994, 18 (01) :45-65
[9]  
ChangwooPhilipLim, 2015, 회계정보연구, V33, P179
[10]  
Cheon Youngsoon, 2003, [korean management review, 경영학연구], V32, P1001