Playing with the forest: invasive alien plants, policy and protected areas in India

被引:0
作者
Kannan, Ramesh [1 ,2 ]
Shackleton, Charlie M. [1 ]
Shaanker, R. Uma [3 ]
机构
[1] Rhodes Univ, Dept Environm Sci, ZA-6140 Grahamstown, South Africa
[2] Ashoka Trust Res Ecol & Environm, Bangalore 560064, Karnataka, India
[3] Univ Agr Sci Bangalore, Dept Crop Physiol, Sch Ecol & Conservat, Bangalore 560065, Karnataka, India
来源
CURRENT SCIENCE | 2013年 / 104卷 / 09期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Forest policies; invasive alien species; protected area network; LANTANA-CAMARA L; DECIDUOUS FOREST; MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION; HABITAT; SYSTEM; IMPACT; COSTS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Protected areas (PAs) are inviolate and invaluable landscapes that promote the in situ conservation of endangered, threatened and rare species. Accordingly, and in keeping with this definition, PA managers ensure that PAs are free from fire, poaching, grazing, non-timber forest products collection, mining, etc. In India, following the Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act (1972), there are today 102 and 515 National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries respectively. Many of these have in recent decades been heavily threatened by the spread of invasive alien plant species, notable among them being Lantana and Eupatorium. These species may have usurped as yet unestimated number of native plants and fauna, besides depressing the reproduction of native plant species. In fact, it is realized that the threat to biodiversity by invasive alien species (IAS) may only be second to that of fragmentation. Yet there seems to be no major attempts to eradicate, contain or manage IAS in PAs. Ironically, the justification for the lack of action lies in the definition of PAs that they need to be kept inviolate and therefore above any active intervention. In this article we bring home this serious contradiction in the approach to management of PAs in India and discuss the philosophical origins of this practice. We argue that if we are to protect our PAs from the serious scourge of invasive species, we would have to relook at the policy governing PA management and revise it to be more inclusive than exclusive.
引用
收藏
页码:1159 / 1165
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Ambinakudige S, 2011, J POLIT ECOL, V18, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, INT FOR MAN IFM OP G
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1988, NAT FOR POL RIGHTS C
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, SANCTUARY MAGAZINE, P1
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1952, AGR LEG IND AGR PROD, V8, P1
[6]  
Aravind NA, 2010, TROP ECOL, V51, P325
[7]  
Balooni Kulbhushan., 2002, POLICY TREND REPORT, V2002, P88
[8]   A Battle Lost? Report on Two Centuries of Invasion and Management of Lantana camara L. in Australia, India and South Africa [J].
Bhagwat, Shonil A. ;
Breman, Elinor ;
Thekaekara, Tarsh ;
Thornton, Thomas F. ;
Willis, Katherine J. .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (03)
[9]  
Bhargav P., 2011, GOVERNANCE NOW, P44
[10]   Economic evaluation of biological invasions -: a survey [J].
Born, W ;
Rauschmayer, F ;
Bräuer, I .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 55 (03) :321-336