Item-nonspecific proactive interference in monkeys' auditory short-term memory

被引:4
作者
Bigelow, James [1 ]
Poremba, Amy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
VISUAL WORKING-MEMORY; MATCHING-TO-SAMPLE; RHESUS-MONKEY; ANIMAL MEMORY; CEBUS-APELLA; LIST MEMORY; SIMILARITY; MECHANISMS; CATEGORIES; RETENTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.heares.2015.05.002
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Recent studies using the delayed matching-to-sample (DMS) paradigm indicate that monkeys' auditory short-term memory (STM) is susceptible to proactive interference (PI). During the task, subjects must indicate whether sample and test sounds separated by a retention interval are identical (match) or not (nonmatch). If a nonmatching test stimulus also occurred on a previous trial, monkeys are more likely to incorrectly make a "match" response (item-specific PI). However, it is not known whether PI may be caused by sounds presented on prior trials that are similar, but nonidentical to the current test stimulus (item-nonspecific PI). This possibility was investigated in two experiments. In Experiment 1, memoranda for each trial comprised tones with a wide range of frequencies, thus minimizing item-specific PI and producing a range of frequency differences among nonidentical tones. In Experiment 2, memoranda were drawn from a set of eight artificial sounds that differed from each other by one, two, or three acoustic dimensions (frequency, spectral bandwidth, and temporal dynamics). Results from both experiments indicate that subjects committed more errors when previously-presented sounds were acoustically similar (though not identical) to the test stimulus of the current trial. Significant effects were produced only by stimuli from the immediately previous trial, suggesting that item-nonspecific PI is less perseverant than item-specific PI, which can extend across noncontiguous trials. Our results contribute to existing human and animal STM literature reporting item-nonspecific PI caused by perceptual similarity among memoranda. Together, these observations underscore the significance of both temporal and discriminability factors in monkeys' STM. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 77
页数:9
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Baddeley AD., 1990, Human memory: theory and practice, P169
[2]   Frontal lobe mechanisms that resolve proactive interference [J].
Badre, D ;
Wagner, AD .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2005, 15 (12) :2003-2012
[3]   Achilles' Ear? Inferior Human Short-Term and Recognition Memory in the Auditory Modality [J].
Bigelow, James ;
Poremba, Amy .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (02)
[4]   Auditory proactive interference in monkeys: The roles of stimulus set size and intertrial interval [J].
Bigelow, James ;
Poremba, Amy .
LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 2013, 41 (03) :319-332
[5]   Auditory Memory in Monkeys: Costs and Benefits of Proactive Interference [J].
Bigelow, James ;
Poremba, Amy .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 2013, 75 (05) :425-434
[6]   Proactive interference and item similarity in working memory [J].
Bunting, M .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2006, 32 (02) :183-196
[7]  
COLOMBO M, 1986, Q J EXP PSYCHOL-B, V38, P425
[8]   GRAMMAR AND MEMORY .1. PHONOLOGICAL SIMILARITY AND PROACTIVE INTERFERENCE [J].
COLTHEART, M ;
GEFFEN, G .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 1 (03) :215-224
[9]   Escaping the recent past: Which stimulus dimensions influence proactive interference? [J].
Craig, Kimberly S. ;
Berman, Marc G. ;
Jonides, John ;
Lustig, Cindy .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2013, 41 (05) :650-670
[10]  
D'Amato MR., 1973, The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory, P227, DOI [10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60069-9, DOI 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60069-9]