Low salinity waterflooding for a carbonate reservoir: Experimental evaluation and numerical interpretation

被引:78
|
作者
Nasralla, Ramez A. [1 ]
Mahani, Hassan [1 ]
van der Linde, Hilbert A. [1 ]
Marcelis, Fons H. M. [1 ]
Masalmeh, Shehadeh K. [2 ]
Sergienko, Ekaterina [1 ]
Brussee, Niels J. [1 ]
Pieterse, Sebastiaan G. J. [1 ]
Basu, Saptarshi [3 ]
机构
[1] Shell Global Solut Int BV, The Hague, Netherlands
[2] Shell Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[3] Shell India Markets Pvt Ltd, Madras, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
ENHANCED OIL-RECOVERY; DETERMINING IONS CA2+; WETTABILITY ALTERATION; SPONTANEOUS IMBIBITION; IMPACT; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.petrol.2018.01.028
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Several laboratory studies and some field trials have already demonstrated the potential of lowering the injected brine salinity and/or manipulating composition to improve oil recovery in carbonate reservoirs. Laboratory SCAL tests such as coreflooding and imbibition are key steps to screen low salinity waterflood (LSF) for a particular field to (i) ensure that there is LSF response in the studied rock/oil/brine system, (ii) find the optimal brine salinity, (iii) extract relative permeability curves to be used in the reservoir simulation model and quantify the benefit of LSF and (iv) examine the compatibility of injected brine with formation brine and rock to derisk any potential scaling or formation damage caused by fines mobilization. This paper presents an extensive LSF SCAL study for a carbonate reservoir and the numerical interpretation of the tests. The SCAL experiments were performed at reservoir conditions using reservoir core plugs, dead crude oil and synthetic brines. The rock was characterized using porosity-permeability measurement semiquantitative, X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and mercury intrusion capillary pressure (MICP) techniques. The characterization work showed that the plugs can be classified into two groups (uni-modal and bi-modal) based on pore throat size distribution which correlated with porosity-permeability cross-plots. The SCAL experiments were divided in two categories. Firstly, spontaneous imbibition and qualitative unsteady-state (USS) experiments were performed to demonstrate the effect of low salinity brines. In addition, these experiments helped to screen different brines (seawater and different dilutions of seawater) in order to choose the one that showed the most promising effect. Secondly, quantitative unsteady-state (USS) experiments were conducted and interpreted using numerical simulation to extract relative permeability curves for high salinity and low salinity brines by history- matching production and pressure data. The main conclusions of the study are: 1- The spontaneous imbibition and qualitative USS experiments showed extra oil production when switching from formation brine to seawater or diluted seawater subsequently, 2- Oil recovery by LSF can be maximized by injection of brine at a certain salinity threshold, at which lowering the brines salinity further did not lead to additional recovery improvement, 3- The LSF effect and optimal brine salinity varied in different layers of the reservoir which indicates that within the same reservoir the LSF effect is quite dependent on the rock type/ property and mineralogy, 4- The quantitative USS showed that LSF can improve the oil recovery factor by up to 7% at core scale compared to formation brine injection.
引用
收藏
页码:640 / 654
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Pore-scale imaging and analysis of low salinity waterflooding in a heterogeneous carbonate rock at reservoir conditions
    Selem, Ahmed M.
    Agenet, Nicolas
    Gao, Ying
    Raeini, Ali Q.
    Blunt, Martin J.
    Bijeljic, Branko
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [12] Pore-scale imaging and analysis of low salinity waterflooding in a heterogeneous carbonate rock at reservoir conditions
    Ahmed M. Selem
    Nicolas Agenet
    Ying Gao
    Ali Q. Raeini
    Martin J. Blunt
    Branko Bijeljic
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [13] Low Salinity Waterflooding in Carbonate Reservoirs: Review of Interfacial Mechanisms
    Derkani, Maryam H.
    Fletcher, Ashleigh J.
    Abdallah, Wael
    Sauerer, Bastian
    Anderson, James
    Zhang, Zhenyu J.
    COLLOIDS AND INTERFACES, 2018, 2 (02)
  • [14] Low-salinity flooding in a selected carbonate reservoir: experimental approach
    Al-Attar, Hazim H.
    Mahmoud, Mohamed Y.
    Zekri, Abdulrazag Y.
    Almehaideb, Reyadh
    Ghannam, Mamdouh
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 3 (02) : 139 - 149
  • [15] Pore-Scale Imaging of Emulsification of Oil during Tertiary and Secondary Low Salinity Waterflooding in a Reservoir Carbonate
    Selem, Ahmed M.
    Agenet, Nicolas
    Foroughi, Sajjad
    Blunt, Martin J.
    Bijeljic, Branko
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2023, 37 (21) : 16368 - 16377
  • [16] Impact of reservoir geochemistry on low salinity waterflooding: Global sensitivity analysis
    Elgendy, Ahmed M. S.
    Porta, Giovanni M.
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 207
  • [17] Numerical investigation of optimum ions concentration in low salinity waterflooding
    Ben Mahmud, Hisham
    Mahmud, Walid Mohamed
    Arumugam, Shattia
    ADVANCES IN GEO-ENERGY RESEARCH, 2020, 4 (03): : 271 - 285
  • [18] A Review and Evaluation of Laboratory-to-Field Approach for Low-Salinity Waterflooding Process for Carbonate Reservoirs
    Hemanta K. Sarma
    Navpreet Singh
    Ahmed F. Belhaj
    Adarsh K. Jain
    Giridhar Gopal
    Vivek R. Srivastava
    Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2023, 48 : 15747 - 15767
  • [19] A Review and Evaluation of Laboratory-to-Field Approach for Low-Salinity Waterflooding Process for Carbonate Reservoirs
    Sarma, Hemanta K. K.
    Singh, Navpreet
    Belhaj, Ahmed F. F.
    Jain, Adarsh K. K.
    Gopal, Giridhar
    Srivastava, Vivek R. R.
    ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 48 (12) : 15747 - 15767
  • [20] Review on Underlying Mechanisms of Low Salinity Waterflooding: Comparisons between Sandstone and Carbonate
    Lyu, Chaohui
    Zhong, Liguo
    Ning, Zhengfu
    Chen, Mingqiang
    Cole, David R.
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2022, 36 (05) : 2407 - 2423