Performance of Tuberculosis Drug Susceptibility Testing in U.S. Laboratories from 1994 to 2008

被引:27
作者
Angr, Pawan K. [1 ]
Taylor, Thomas H. [2 ]
Iademarco, Michael F. [3 ]
Metchock, Beverly [3 ]
Astles, J. Rex [4 ]
Ridderhof, John C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Lab Syst Dev Branch, Div Preparedness & Emerging Infect, Natl Ctr Emerging & Zoonot Dis, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Bacterial Dis, Natl Ctr Immunizat & Resp Dis, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Branch Lab, Div TB Eliminat, Natl Ctr HIV AIDS Viral Hepatitis STD & TB Preven, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Lab Sci, Policy & Practice Program Off, Off Surveillance,Epidemiol & Lab Serv, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
QUALITY-ASSURANCE PROGRAM; MYCOBACTERIUM-TUBERCULOSIS; RESISTANCE; NETWORK; ROUNDS;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.06479-11
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
We present a statistical summary of results from the Model Performance Evaluation Program (MPEP) for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Drug Susceptibility Testing, 1994 to 2008, implemented by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). During that period, a total of 57,733 test results for culture isolates were reported by 216 participating laboratories for the first-line antituberculosis drugs used in the United States-isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RMP), ethambutol (EMB), and pyrazinamide (PZA). Using Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute (CLSI)-recommended concentrations for one or more of three methods, agar proportion (AP), BACTEC460 (Bactec), and MGIT-960 (MGIT), yielded overall agreement of 97.0% for first-line drugs. For susceptible strains, agreement was 98.4%; for resistant strains, agreement was 91.0%, with significantly lower accuracy (chisquare test, P < 0.0001). For resistant strains, overall agreement by methods was 91.3% for AP, 93.0% for Bactec, and 82.6% for MGIT and by drugs was 92.2% for INH, 91.5% for RMP, 79.0% for EMB, and 97.5% for PZA. For some strains, performance by method varied significantly. Use of duplicate strains in the same shipment and repeat strains over time revealed consistent performance even for strains with higher levels of interlaboratory discordance. No overall differences in performance between laboratories were observed based on volume of testing or type of facility (e.g., health department, hospital, independent). By all methods, decreased performance was observed for strains with low-level INH resistance, RMP resistance, and EMB-resistant strains. These results demonstrate a high level of performance in detection of drug-resistant M. tuberculosis in U.S. laboratories.
引用
收藏
页码:1233 / 1239
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, MMWR Recomm. Rep, V41
[2]  
[Anonymous], REP TUB US 2009
[3]   The ins and outs of Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug susceptibility testing [J].
Boettger, E. C. .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2011, 17 (08) :1128-1134
[4]  
CANETTI G, 1963, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V29, P565
[5]  
*CDCP, 1995, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V44, P587
[6]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2011, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V60, P333
[7]  
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2011, SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTI
[8]  
COHN ML, 1968, AM REV RESPIR DIS, V98, P295
[9]  
Fattorini L, 2008, INT J TUBERC LUNG D, V12, P214
[10]   CURRENT PRACTICES IN MYCOBACTERIOLOGY - RESULTS OF A SURVEY OF STATE PUBLIC-HEALTH LABORATORIES [J].
HUEBNER, RE ;
GOOD, RC ;
TOKARS, JI .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1993, 31 (04) :771-775