An assessment of the discriminative ability of the EQ-5Dindex, SF-6D, and EQ VAS, using sociodemographic factors and clinical conditions

被引:53
作者
Barton, Garry R. [1 ]
Sach, Tracey H. [2 ]
Doherty, Michael [3 ]
Avery, Anthony J. [2 ]
Jenkinson, Claire [2 ]
Muir, Kenneth R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Econ, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Sch Community Hlth Sci, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Acad Rheumatol, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
construct validity; EQ-5D; SF-6D; health-related quality of life;
D O I
10.1007/s10198-007-0068-z
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective To assess whether three health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) measures (the EQ-5D(index), SF-6D, and EQ VAS) can discriminate between the HRQL of different groups of individuals. Methods In one UK general practice a cross-sectional survey requested information on six sociodemographic factors, 10 clinical conditions, and the three HRQL measures. Regression analyses were used to assess whether there was a significant difference in HRQL between groups with different sociodemographic factors and those with and without clinical conditions. Results One thousand eight hundred and sixty-five questionnaires were returned. There was a significant difference between the HRQL of the majority of different groups according to each HRQL measure. However, not all of the measures could discriminate between groups of different ethnicity, gender, or smoking status, or those with and without asthma, stroke, cancer or diabetes. Conclusion The HRQL of the majority of different groups could be discriminated between by the EQ-5D(index), SF-6D, and EQ VAS.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 249
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1998, Obes Res, V6, p51S
  • [2] [Anonymous], 190 U YORK CTR HLTH
  • [3] Inconsistent responses in three preference-elicitation methods for health states
    Badia, X
    Roset, M
    Herdman, M
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 49 (07) : 943 - 950
  • [4] Comparing utility scores before and after hearing-aid provision: Results according to the EQ-5D, HUI3 and SF-6D
    Barton G.R.
    Bankart J.
    Davis A.C.
    Summerfield Q.A.
    [J]. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2004, 3 (2) : 103 - 105
  • [5] The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36
    Brazier, J
    Roberts, J
    Deverill, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2002, 21 (02) : 271 - 292
  • [6] A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups
    Brazier, J
    Roberts, J
    Tsuchiya, A
    Busschbach, J
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2004, 13 (09) : 873 - 884
  • [7] Brazier J, 1993, Health Econ, V2, P213, DOI 10.1002/hec.4730020304
  • [8] Brazier J., 1999, J Health Serv Res Policy, V4, P174, DOI [10.1177/135581969900400310, DOI 10.1177/135581969900400310]
  • [9] EuroQol: The current state of play
    Brooks, R
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 1996, 37 (01) : 53 - 72
  • [10] WHO RESPONDS TO POSTAL QUESTIONNAIRES
    CARTWRIGHT, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1986, 40 (03) : 267 - 273